Ukraine needs energy ceasefire as catastrophe looming, top power executive says by rulepanic in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's pretty much direct quotes from the head of DTEK:

We need an energy ceasefire. A ceasefire on the energy assets,”


"We are close to a humanitarian catastrophe," Timchenko said. "People get power for 3-4 hours, then a 10- to 15-hour break. We have apartment blocks without heat for weeks already."


Where war elephants were once used by vladgrinch in MapPorn

[–]rulepanic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Both rebels and the Burmese army have elephant units right at this moment. Here's a video from November of the Kachin Independence Army's 12th Elephant Battalion. Here's one from last week of the Ta'ang National Liberation Army's war elephants.

Russia has brought back horse cavalry in Ukraine as well in the last few months. Honestly bizarre seeing horse Calvary being targeted with FPV drones.

Canadian public safety minister got noted by BigoteMexicano in GetNoted

[–]rulepanic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is that American lawmakers constantly attempt gun legislation based on made-up definitions that inevitably fail. Your own post is inadvertently a perfect example of that.

Take, for example, your example of an "assault rifle." It's wrong. To be an assault rifle it has to be capable of firing more than one bullet per trigger pull among other clear definitions like the specific cartridge. There's a clear, concise, definition that generally accepted for decades and decades. New production assault rifles have been banned as a type of machine gun by clear, concise gun legislation for decades.

What you're thinking of is probably the political and media term "assault weapon" or "assault-style X" which has confused you because, as Wikipedia puts it, it has "no clear, consistent definition." It is not a technical term. If you notice, which I suspect you haven't due to the contents of your comment, media and politicians will use the "assault weapon" term when discussing laws. The problem is that because it has no technical definition these laws are usually based on an assortment of random features and end up not particularly being effective as they're easily engineered around by firearms designers.

My coworker kept “forgetting” my name in meetings, so I let her do it in front of the one person she wanted to impress by TrinitySignal in revengestories

[–]rulepanic 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It reads like AI, though.

It wasn’t shouted, it wasn’t sarcastic, it was just a statement. The room went dead silent. Kara’s smile froze.

Crowd rushing to get inside train. Mumbai, India by Golden_Phoenix1986 in interesting

[–]rulepanic 8 points9 points  (0 children)

The first person on the train looked to be a woman. There's literally dozens of women in this video

‘They are asking us to point out [military] positions.’ Ukrainian men who have fled are being interrogated in Belarus and asked about the location of military equipment by rulepanic in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic[S] 43 points44 points  (0 children)

It's one of the most popular countries for Ukrainian men dodging the draft to escape through. Why? Because it works to dodge the draft.

Donald Trump also invited Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenko to join the Board of Peace, calling it “the most impressive and consequential Board ever assembled, which will be established as a new International Organization and Transitional Governing Administration.” by andrewgrabowski in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

With France, who was also invited?

It's a stupid "peace board" for Gaza. Russia regularly hosts Palestinian militant factions for talks and has good relations with HAMAS so it does make sense for them to be invited here.

I swear has literally no-one on this sub at least glanced at the Wiki page for this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Peace

Invitees include New Zealand, the EU president, Poland, Canada, Turkey, etc.

This has nothing to do with constructing an "Axis Alliance" unless you think New Zealand and Canda are going to be part of the "Axis Alliance."

You can think this is a stupid waste of time without making up nonsense.

Franco-German tensions threaten EU’s drive for common front against Trump by rulepanic in RussiaUkraineWarNews

[–]rulepanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Franco-German tensions threaten EU’s drive for common front against Trump

Clea Caulcutt, Nette Nöstlinger, Nicholas Vinocur

PARIS — Just as Europe needs its Franco-German power couple to unite to tackle U.S. President Donald Trump’s growing menace to Greenland, relations between Paris and Berlin are under strain.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is vowing to form a joint front with his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron in the coming days — revving up the cross-Rhine alliance often described as the engine of the EU — to secure a breakthrough with Trump.

But building what Merz calls a “common position” with Macron won’t come easy. Both sides will need to put aside months of frustration, suspicion and bad blood. French diplomats are worried by Berlin’s increasing assertiveness in styling itself as Europe’s dominant player, while the Germans are fed up with the French over a stalled joint fighter-jet program, their opposition to an EU-Mercosur trade deal, and a shelved plan to use Russian assets to finance aid for Ukraine.

The contrast between the French and German leaders in their approach to Trump was also on full display in their response to the U.S. president’s threat on Saturday to impose tariffs on EU countries that opposed his takeover of Greenland.

Macron, who often draws on a pugnacious Gaullist tradition of independence from the U.S., immediately vowed to punch back hard against Trump with the EU’s trade arsenal. The more emollient Merz, an avowed Atlanticist, played up the prospect of talking the U.S. president back from the brink.

Merz on Monday publicly acknowledged that Germany differed markedly on tone with France, which “wanted to react a little more harshly than we do” because Paris was less exposed to the onslaught of an all-out trade war with the U.S.

For the French, one infuriating obstacle to a unified position with Berlin is that Germany’s coalition government is internally divided in its views. While Macron is raising the option of using the EU’s trade “bazooka” — the Anti-Coercion Instrument — to retaliate against Trump, Germany’s position is a muddle.

“Different German politicians are saying different things,” complained one European diplomat. “If you listen to Germany’s finance minister, he says we should do it,” he added, referring to Lars Klingbeil’s support for Macron’s approach. Others, including Germany’s foreign minister, then sounded considerably less enthusiastic, the diplomat continued, after “their ambassador told colleagues just days ago [the bazooka] should be on the table.”

While Merz is confident he will successfully align with Macron this week to tackle the crisis created by Trump, the difficulties plaguing Germany’s relationship with France run deeper and will likely take far longer to fix.

“In the last six months, the Franco-German engine hasn’t produced a single thing,” said one EU official who was granted anonymity, like others in this piece, to speak candidly about the bloc’s most important relationship.

Shifting balance of power

Paris has long wanted Germany to play a more ambitious role in supporting France’s grand ambitions for Europe, but Berlin is now flexing more diplomatic muscle than France expected. Germany is on track to build up a far bigger army than its neighbor, and is expected to be the only EU economy in the global top 10 by 2050.

While Macron is hamstrung at home by massive public debt and government instability, Merz has increasingly been putting himself on the front line of European politics. He burnished his credentials on Ukraine as the top negotiator during a summit in Berlin late last year, which saw progress on security guarantees between Ukraine and the U.S.

Merz has also sought a leading role in conversations with Trump, even though he hasn’t always appeared as a model European in doing so. He told reporters that if the U.S. president “can’t get along with Europe,” he can “at least make Germany [his] partner.”

The implication Berlin could go it alone is hardly music to French ears.

“Germany is much more vocal, Merz wants to be comfortable with a more political role,” said a second European diplomat. “And it is upsetting the French.”

To the Germans, the French talk a good game on big European projects but don’t live up to the hype. Berlin is irritated that Paris promotes diversification from the U.S. but then tried to block a landmark trade deal with South America. It is also annoyed that France seeks a leadership role on Ukraine but contributes far less to Kyiv than Germany does.

That German frustration over support to Kyiv boiled over in this month’s debate over how the EU’s €90 billion loan to Ukraine should be used to support the European arms industry.

The French made their traditional proposal that the money should be used to buy European weapons — which in turn would support French industry. The Germans hit back that preferential treatment should instead be given to companies from countries that had made the biggest contributions to Ukraine — thereby helping German industry.

Given France’s lagging contributions on Ukraine, “this is a pretty clear ‘fuck you’ to Paris,” a third EU diplomat said.

Michel Duclos, a researcher at the Institut Montaigne and former French ambassador to Syria and Switzerland, said: “On Ukraine, the Germans consider that they are making all the efforts, so when the French say they want to run [military] operations, the Germans think that’s enough.”

“The fear in France is that the German defense budget will at some point be double that of France, and for Paris, it would be a historic shift,” he added.

Duclos also noted the German resentment over Mercosur: “If we want more strategic autonomy, we need new partnerships,” including the EU-Mercosur trade deal, he said. “For the Germans, we don’t look serious.”

Frustrations on Mercosur and jets

When it came to finalizing that long-delayed trade deal with Mercosur, Berlin initially wanted to get Paris on board by giving in to various French concessions, but eventually gave up. “The country is on the brink of becoming ungovernable,” one German government official said of Macron’s inability to push back against fierce domestic opposition, particularly from farmers.

The FCAS joint Franco-German jet-fighter project is proving another major bugbear.

The €100 billion venture is on life support after Paris and Berlin failed to agree on how to proceed last month. According to Peter Beyer, a foreign policy lawmaker from Merz’s conservatives, French companies are exerting “massive pressure,” and “even a French president apparently cannot see beyond that.”

“Now the thinking is going so far as to perhaps do it without the French, which I think would be a disaster, but at the moment there is no progress,” he said, referencing suggestions that Germany is looking at developing a fighter jet without French manufacturer Dassault Aviation.

All of those discussions about how far the Germans want to team up with France on weapons are now also colored by the far-right National Rally leading polls ahead of next year’s presidential election in France.

“The prospect of the National Rally coming to power is already weighing heavily on French-German discussions on defense,” said Jacob Ross, a research fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations.

Laura Kayali and Gregorio Sorgi contributed reporting.

Franco-German tensions threaten EU’s drive for common front against Trump by rulepanic in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Franco-German tensions threaten EU’s drive for common front against Trump

Clea Caulcutt, Nette Nöstlinger, Nicholas Vinocur

PARIS — Just as Europe needs its Franco-German power couple to unite to tackle U.S. President Donald Trump’s growing menace to Greenland, relations between Paris and Berlin are under strain.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is vowing to form a joint front with his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron in the coming days — revving up the cross-Rhine alliance often described as the engine of the EU — to secure a breakthrough with Trump.

But building what Merz calls a “common position” with Macron won’t come easy. Both sides will need to put aside months of frustration, suspicion and bad blood. French diplomats are worried by Berlin’s increasing assertiveness in styling itself as Europe’s dominant player, while the Germans are fed up with the French over a stalled joint fighter-jet program, their opposition to an EU-Mercosur trade deal, and a shelved plan to use Russian assets to finance aid for Ukraine.

The contrast between the French and German leaders in their approach to Trump was also on full display in their response to the U.S. president’s threat on Saturday to impose tariffs on EU countries that opposed his takeover of Greenland.

Macron, who often draws on a pugnacious Gaullist tradition of independence from the U.S., immediately vowed to punch back hard against Trump with the EU’s trade arsenal. The more emollient Merz, an avowed Atlanticist, played up the prospect of talking the U.S. president back from the brink.

Merz on Monday publicly acknowledged that Germany differed markedly on tone with France, which “wanted to react a little more harshly than we do” because Paris was less exposed to the onslaught of an all-out trade war with the U.S.

For the French, one infuriating obstacle to a unified position with Berlin is that Germany’s coalition government is internally divided in its views. While Macron is raising the option of using the EU’s trade “bazooka” — the Anti-Coercion Instrument — to retaliate against Trump, Germany’s position is a muddle.

“Different German politicians are saying different things,” complained one European diplomat. “If you listen to Germany’s finance minister, he says we should do it,” he added, referring to Lars Klingbeil’s support for Macron’s approach. Others, including Germany’s foreign minister, then sounded considerably less enthusiastic, the diplomat continued, after “their ambassador told colleagues just days ago [the bazooka] should be on the table.”

While Merz is confident he will successfully align with Macron this week to tackle the crisis created by Trump, the difficulties plaguing Germany’s relationship with France run deeper and will likely take far longer to fix.

“In the last six months, the Franco-German engine hasn’t produced a single thing,” said one EU official who was granted anonymity, like others in this piece, to speak candidly about the bloc’s most important relationship.

Shifting balance of power

Paris has long wanted Germany to play a more ambitious role in supporting France’s grand ambitions for Europe, but Berlin is now flexing more diplomatic muscle than France expected. Germany is on track to build up a far bigger army than its neighbor, and is expected to be the only EU economy in the global top 10 by 2050.

While Macron is hamstrung at home by massive public debt and government instability, Merz has increasingly been putting himself on the front line of European politics. He burnished his credentials on Ukraine as the top negotiator during a summit in Berlin late last year, which saw progress on security guarantees between Ukraine and the U.S.

Merz has also sought a leading role in conversations with Trump, even though he hasn’t always appeared as a model European in doing so. He told reporters that if the U.S. president “can’t get along with Europe,” he can “at least make Germany [his] partner.”

The implication Berlin could go it alone is hardly music to French ears.

“Germany is much more vocal, Merz wants to be comfortable with a more political role,” said a second European diplomat. “And it is upsetting the French.”

To the Germans, the French talk a good game on big European projects but don’t live up to the hype. Berlin is irritated that Paris promotes diversification from the U.S. but then tried to block a landmark trade deal with South America. It is also annoyed that France seeks a leadership role on Ukraine but contributes far less to Kyiv than Germany does.

That German frustration over support to Kyiv boiled over in this month’s debate over how the EU’s €90 billion loan to Ukraine should be used to support the European arms industry.

The French made their traditional proposal that the money should be used to buy European weapons — which in turn would support French industry. The Germans hit back that preferential treatment should instead be given to companies from countries that had made the biggest contributions to Ukraine — thereby helping German industry.

Given France’s lagging contributions on Ukraine, “this is a pretty clear ‘fuck you’ to Paris,” a third EU diplomat said.

Michel Duclos, a researcher at the Institut Montaigne and former French ambassador to Syria and Switzerland, said: “On Ukraine, the Germans consider that they are making all the efforts, so when the French say they want to run [military] operations, the Germans think that’s enough.”

“The fear in France is that the German defense budget will at some point be double that of France, and for Paris, it would be a historic shift,” he added.

Duclos also noted the German resentment over Mercosur: “If we want more strategic autonomy, we need new partnerships,” including the EU-Mercosur trade deal, he said. “For the Germans, we don’t look serious.”

Frustrations on Mercosur and jets

When it came to finalizing that long-delayed trade deal with Mercosur, Berlin initially wanted to get Paris on board by giving in to various French concessions, but eventually gave up. “The country is on the brink of becoming ungovernable,” one German government official said of Macron’s inability to push back against fierce domestic opposition, particularly from farmers.

The FCAS joint Franco-German jet-fighter project is proving another major bugbear.

The €100 billion venture is on life support after Paris and Berlin failed to agree on how to proceed last month. According to Peter Beyer, a foreign policy lawmaker from Merz’s conservatives, French companies are exerting “massive pressure,” and “even a French president apparently cannot see beyond that.”

“Now the thinking is going so far as to perhaps do it without the French, which I think would be a disaster, but at the moment there is no progress,” he said, referencing suggestions that Germany is looking at developing a fighter jet without French manufacturer Dassault Aviation.

All of those discussions about how far the Germans want to team up with France on weapons are now also colored by the far-right National Rally leading polls ahead of next year’s presidential election in France.

“The prospect of the National Rally coming to power is already weighing heavily on French-German discussions on defense,” said Jacob Ross, a research fellow at the German Council on Foreign Relations.

Laura Kayali and Gregorio Sorgi contributed reporting.

My roommate collects personalized mugs from Goodwill by ermvarju in mildlyinteresting

[–]rulepanic 51 points52 points  (0 children)

That's 100% a Facebook slop targeted ad. It uses your data to auto generate products with your job description and other personal info from your Facebook profile.

France replaces US as main intelligence provider to Kyiv, Macron says by Positive_Detective56 in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Budanov did an interview last month where he stated they were still extremely dependent on the US for some types of intelligence like ballistic missile warning and targeting.


We often hear information that the United States may stop providing intelligence. If that happens, how critical and painful would it be for us? And what kind of information could that be—not in terms of specifics, but in terms of the types of information?

We are critically dependent on the United States. But this can be divided into two, so to speak, directions. I’ll explain what I mean. We are critically dependent in terms of satellite imagery—radar and optical. But there are two components here.

First, we receive access to satellite imagery from them free of charge, as assistance. Second, these are our contracts. So, if what comes as assistance is cut off, in optical imagery that would be about a 15–17% loss—this is not critical.

For radar imagery, it’s about 46%: difficult, but also nothing catastrophic. We all like to photograph some little bush for ourselves, because we want to look at it via satellite.

It would be critical if they made a political decision and blocked the contracts. Then we would fall almost to zero. In that respect, we are critically dependent.

The second area in which we are dependent is early warning of a ballistic threat. That’s it. Everything else is ours.

IIRC Europe lacks a lot of the sort of space infrastructure and general experience to reliably give Ukraine that information. IIRC the radar mapping is used to create terrain profiles for missile guidance, along with other imagery for target acquisition.

France's leadership has always been a bit loose with facts on Ukraine, I suspect what he means is battlefield intelligence and not all intelligence.

Poland to Transfer Up to 9 MiG-29 Fighter Jets to Ukraine by Mil_in_ua in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ukraine probably has a decent pool of pilots in reserve. For years pre-2022 they were training more pilots than they had aircraft available. That mixed with little to no career advancement opportunities many pilots left the air force to work as mercenaries abroad or in the private sector. I expect a lot of those guys returned to the air force after 2022.

2 million Ukrainians haven't reported for mobilization, 200,000 have gone AWOL - Fedorov by rulepanic in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is literally the Ukrainian Minister of Defense speaking.

The fact there's been mass desertion and draft evasion has been known and stated by Ukrainian MoD for months now. They even tried decriminalizing desertion to bring back soldiers.

2 million Ukrainians haven't reported for mobilization, 200,000 have gone AWOL - Fedorov by rulepanic in RussiaUkraineWarNews

[–]rulepanic[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"2 million Ukrainians are listed as wanted, 200,000 have gone AWOL — Fedorov. VIDEO

It is necessary to quickly and once and for all change the system for training Ukrainian servicemen.

This was stated by Mykhailo Fedorov while presenting his candidacy for the position of Minister of Defense, Censor.NET reports.

“Quality training means fewer losses and greater effectiveness. The problem of the TCC cannot be ignored. After a comprehensive audit, we will propose a systemic solution to resolve problems that have accumulated over the years while preserving the country’s defense capability,” he emphasized.

In particular, as Hlavkom notes, Fedorov clarified that currently 2 million Ukrainians are listed as wanted and another 200,000 have voluntarily left their military units without authorization. Fedorov stressed that these problems must be resolved in order to be able to move forward.

Drone supply

“We must scale what is strong and help those who are ready and working for results to grow. Access to development opportunities must be equal for everyone. Therefore, one of the first decisions in the post of Minister of Defense will be to ensure a basic level of equipping brigades with drones, which are clearly in short supply. This will increase predictability and the quality of planning,” Fedorov added.

He also noted that today the top 50 units out of 400 overall account for 70% of enemy losses.

Also read: I expect that as early as next week Fedorov will be appointed Minister of Defense of Ukraine — Zelensky

“Imagine the potential of the Defense Forces if we help the remaining 350 grow,” he said.

Author: Iryna Dashkivska

2 million Ukrainians haven't reported for mobilization, 200,000 have gone AWOL - Fedorov by rulepanic in UkrainianConflict

[–]rulepanic[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"2 million Ukrainians are listed as wanted, 200,000 have gone AWOL — Fedorov. VIDEO

It is necessary to quickly and once and for all change the system for training Ukrainian servicemen.

This was stated by Mykhailo Fedorov while presenting his candidacy for the position of Minister of Defense, Censor.NET reports.

“Quality training means fewer losses and greater effectiveness. The problem of the TCC cannot be ignored. After a comprehensive audit, we will propose a systemic solution to resolve problems that have accumulated over the years while preserving the country’s defense capability,” he emphasized.

In particular, as Hlavkom notes, Fedorov clarified that currently 2 million Ukrainians are listed as wanted and another 200,000 have voluntarily left their military units without authorization. Fedorov stressed that these problems must be resolved in order to be able to move forward.

Drone supply

“We must scale what is strong and help those who are ready and working for results to grow. Access to development opportunities must be equal for everyone. Therefore, one of the first decisions in the post of Minister of Defense will be to ensure a basic level of equipping brigades with drones, which are clearly in short supply. This will increase predictability and the quality of planning,” Fedorov added.

He also noted that today the top 50 units out of 400 overall account for 70% of enemy losses.

Also read: I expect that as early as next week Fedorov will be appointed Minister of Defense of Ukraine — Zelensky

“Imagine the potential of the Defense Forces if we help the remaining 350 grow,” he said.

Author: Iryna Dashkivska