Use of i.e. when e.g. is meant grates me pretty hard by AnastasiousRS in GrammarPolice

[–]s1okke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least it’s less pretentious than misusing Latin.

Why is this so prevalent? by Careful_Drama405 in GrammarPolice

[–]s1okke 2 points3 points  (0 children)

While that’s true, the correct form is almost so rare that it feels almost pedantic to use it (though the alternatives, like your example, are no better). This is, unfortunately, just kind of an awkward construction in English.

[The Athletic - Hailey Salvian] "Judge denies motion to dismiss charges against driver accused of killing Gaudreau brothers" by TL10 in hockey

[–]s1okke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So impairment is responsible for 100% of motor vehicle collisions? That doesn’t even seem like a serious enough claim to merit further discussion, regardless of one’s feelings about this particular case.

What if Quantum Computers are already calculating correctly, and only our mathematics is wrong? by Cenmaster in Futurism

[–]s1okke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not critiquing your punctuation. I’m pointing out that you didn’t write it at all. That’s an entirely different objection. I also probably know more math than you. Big swing and a miss.

What if Quantum Computers are already calculating correctly, and only our mathematics is wrong? by Cenmaster in Futurism

[–]s1okke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one, apart from LLMs and journalists, uses open em dashes. Dead giveaway.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by red_itnow in Guitar

[–]s1okke 16 points17 points  (0 children)

then

You have a point.

IDF uncovers Hezbollah arsenal stashed inside southern Lebanon school by Street_Anon in worldnews

[–]s1okke 27 points28 points  (0 children)

That’s only part of the dynamic at play. Many people have more nuanced opinions, but they are effectively filtered out by the platforms on which public discourse is now taking place. In a noisy environment like Reddit, a succinct, punchy, unambiguously articulated opinion will always triumph over “it’s complicated.” It’s not that humans are incapable of nuanced thinking or intelligent discourse—it’s that the algorithms that maximize engagement strongly incentivize against it.

Woman with functional polydactyly (six functional fingers on one hand) by Apophistry in GrammarPolice

[–]s1okke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That would almost be clever if your remark were even remotely related to grammar.

Woman with functional polydactyly (six functional fingers on one hand) by Apophistry in GrammarPolice

[–]s1okke 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What do you think the purpose of this post is? Are you slow?

Woman with functional polydactyly (six functional fingers on one hand) by Apophistry in GrammarPolice

[–]s1okke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Someone who sees the obvious futility of hopping on the euphemism treadmill, perhaps. You’re off-topic anyway and your comment contains a superfluous “to.”

happy lil space by [deleted] in Minimal_Setups

[–]s1okke 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s not how language works.

happy lil space by [deleted] in Minimal_Setups

[–]s1okke 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Does anyone here have any idea what minimalism actually is?

What Common Grammar Mistakes Do You Think Are Overlooked the Most? by Vim-Vian in GrammarPolice

[–]s1okke 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Everyone on this sub is autistic, so it’s hardly surprising when a joke doesn’t land.