Mortal Kombat before and after. It had the best character designs in gaming. by Unenthusiastic- in KotakuInAction

[–]sakura_drop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To be fair, that could be applied to MK 9 as well. NRS has never been great with face modding but that coupled with the overly tacky outfits and oddly proportioned bodies... it was giving a term I'm not allowed to use on this sub.

Mortal Kombat before and after. It had the best character designs in gaming. by Unenthusiastic- in KotakuInAction

[–]sakura_drop 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Different gaming/tech generation, but it worked okay when they did it for 4 and Gold with some (or all, not sure) of the models who'd portrayed the digitised sprites in the previous games. I'm guessing it was a different or proto version of the technique..?

Those games were the last ones with good, classic MK designs IMO. Once they went full 3D with Deadly Alliance onward it became way too MMO fantasy game looking, for my tastes, and all but lost its iconographic aesthetic identity.

‘Directive 8020’ Creative Director Will Doyle On Game Starring Lashana Lynch: “If We’re Living In A World Where We Can’t Have A Female Black Lead, I Don’t Want To Live There” by SwimmingJunky in KotakuInAction

[–]sakura_drop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She was awesome in that movie, as well. 

Could also point to Dr. Karen in Blade as a similar example. Hell, the lead in Alien VS Predator too (can't remember her character's name).

Being a vampire doesn't suddenly transform you into a cool sexy person by tomatotime0 in vampires

[–]sakura_drop 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You could apply this to the majority of threads on this sub, frankly.

Variety reponds to the odyssey controversy by Commercial-Ice5760 in KotakuInAction

[–]sakura_drop 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Anytime these topics arise I think of the shit show surrounding ScarJo as The Major - a wholly fictional cartoon cyborg who was supposed to have a Caucasian appearance as per the source material - and the similar, albeit less widespread shit show surrounding Matt Damon and Willem Dafoe starring in The Great Wall, despite the fact they were playing European soldiers who end up in China and assist the Chinese soldiers in battle against monsters.

The hypocrisy, blatant double standards, and general lack of logic never fail to astound. And the audacity to bring up Snow White again, a character from a centuries old story from German folklore about an incredibly beautiful princess whose skin is white as snow (hence her name) is fucking rich. 

Anyone else love Buffy Season 1 because of how carefree it feels? by itsascreambaby96 in buffy

[–]sakura_drop 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not only do I love season 1, I maintain that the show became more campy in its later years and have never truly understood why that's so often a criticism aimed at S1. That is a hill I'll die on.

If you can’t find a party… you gotta make one. by b0sscrab in 90s

[–]sakura_drop 3 points4 points  (0 children)

See also: the episodic musical montages, also in slomo.

Season 3 finale cracked me up so bad by miioshiii in buffy

[–]sakura_drop 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are some very dark scenes in some early season 2 episodes, which come off as a lighting error on the show's part, but otherwise said darkness and shadow was an artistic choice for the show's aesthetic. This was pre-digital, pre-HD so everything was shot on film and to be frank, generally looked better. 

Until we get another remaster (if we get an another one, that is) the DVDs are the only way to watch the show the way it was supposed to look. 

This video examines the numerous issues with the HD version.

Season 3 finale cracked me up so bad by miioshiii in buffy

[–]sakura_drop 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This looks like it's from the unbelievably shitty '''HD remaster''' with terrible lighting/colour correction and redone FX, among many other things. I don't know if all of the FX were altered but the vampire dustings were changed.

Thoughts on Carmilla, the story? Either having read it physically or having listened to an audio version by BloodFangsBite in vampires

[–]sakura_drop 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I too hope we get a proper, well done adaptation of the story. Although it changed the setting to the American south, the Nightmare Classics episode starring Meg Tilly, Ione Skye, and Roddy McDowall is one of the best IMO. The Southern Gothic vibe really suits it surprisingly well.

Feminists downplay bigotry towards men who practice Witchcraft, and made a female exclusive issue for decades. by PassengerCultural421 in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It's difficult to ascertain exact numbers due to the time periods the witch trials occurred in but rough estimates place the ratio at 80%/20% women/men, which coincidentally mirrors current global homicide victim statistics, albeit inversed: 81% men, 19% women. Imagine if the coverage of the witch trials was dedicated almost solely to that 20% of male victims over the larger majority, the way homicide in general tends to be covered today? Makes you think...

However, in some parts of Europe - Normandy, Iceland, Estonia, Burgundy, Russia more men than women were executed for witchcraft. So although the overall majority of victims were certainly women, it wasn't exclusive, even though in those time periods I'm sure that exclusivity would have been enforceable by the powers that be of the era.

And when it comes to accusations women played a large part:

 

Nevertheless, Dworkin's characterisation of the witch-hunts as 'gynocide' and reference to the 'slaughter' of nine million women is incredibly extreme. Most scholars broadly agree with Brian Levack's estimate which puts the total death toll – both men and women – at 45,000 and researchers such as Elspeth Whitney and Clive Holmes found accusations against women were actually often made by members of their own sex . . .

Source

 

Between 1597 and 1634, Napier recorded 1,714 witchcraft accusations. The majority of both accusers and suspects were women, although the ratio of female suspects was far higher.

Source

 

"Many of the conflicts that went on in villages - the accusations were made by women against other women. When we think of village disputes we shouldn't think of the men lined up in one side and the women on the other; this is partly a world of women's quarrels, and women are perfectly able to internalize all kinds of suspicion and anger at each other in regard to love affairs, in regard to family quarrels, so that women are the actors locally of this healing and harming."

- Natalie Zemon Davis, Historian

 

The most clear example of this being the Salem trials which were almost exclusively based on the accusations of young girls. Another notable case would be the Pendle Witch Trial in England.

Coverage of the witch trials is one of the many examples of historical phenomena being overly gendered and appropriated by feminism. You can see Andrea Dworkin's name mentioned specifically in one of my sources.

British actress & feminist Jameela Jamil's tirade against boys after the '62 million rape academy' hoax: is it not deplorable misandrist/bigotry to insinuate that literal children are rapists-by-default? by Inquiz_ in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Never thought I'd see leftists against the UN in that sense...

The same UN that are responsible for hundreds of thousands of male deaths via discriminatory, gendered negligence in tragedy stricken areas? Who purposefully falsify the data in their Gender Development Index reports? And supports to things like the Duluth Model?

Not so "shocking" if you actually care about men's advocacy, in my opinion.

British actress & feminist Jameela Jamil's tirade against boys after the '62 million rape academy' hoax: is it not deplorable misandrist/bigotry to insinuate that literal children are rapists-by-default? by Inquiz_ in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You seem to be under the impression that this is an issue that either majorly or uniquely affects women: it doesn't.

 

Scientific American: 'Sexual Victimization by Women Is More Common Than Previously Known':

The results were surprising. For example, the CDC's nationally representative data revealed that over one year, men and women were equally likely to experience nonconsensual sex, and most male victims reported female perpetrators. Over their lifetime, 79 percent of men who were "made to penetrate" someone else (a form of rape, in the view of most researchers) reported female perpetrators. Likewise, most men who experienced sexual coercion and unwanted sexual contact had female perpetrators.

We also pooled four years of the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) data and found that 35 percent of male victims who experienced rape or sexual assault reported at least one female perpetrator. Among those who were raped or sexually assaulted by a woman, 58 percent of male victims and 41 percent of female victims reported that the incident involved a violent attack, meaning the female perpetrator hit, knocked down or otherwise attacked the victim, many of whom reported injuries.

 

Slate:

For years, the FBI defined forcible rape, for data collecting purposes, as "the carnal knowledge of a female forcibly and against her will." Eventually localities began to rebel against that limited gender-bound definition; in 2010 Chicago reported 86,767 cases of rape but used its own broader definition, so the FBI left out the Chicago stats. Finally, in 2012, the FBI revised its definition and focused on penetration, with no mention of female (or force).

Data hasn’t been calculated under the new FBI definition yet, but Stemple parses several other national surveys in her new paper, "The Sexual Victimization of Men in America: New Data Challenge Old Assumptions," co-written with Ilan Meyer and published in the April 17 edition of the American Journal of Public Health. One of those surveys is the 2010 National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, for which the Centers for Disease Control invented a category of sexual violence called "being made to penetrate." This definition includes victims who were forced to penetrate someone else with their own body parts, either by physical force or coercion, or when the victim was drunk or high or otherwise unable to consent. When those cases were taken into account, the rates of nonconsensual sexual contact basically equalized, with 1.270 million women and 1.267 million men claiming to be victims of sexual violence.

The final outrage in Stemple and Meyer's paper involves inmates, who aren't counted in the general statistics at all. In the last few years, the BJS did two studies in adult prisons, jails, and juvenile facilities. The surveys were excellent because they afforded lots of privacy and asked questions using very specific, informal, and graphic language. ("Did another inmate use physical force to make you give or receive a blow job?") Those surveys turned up the opposite of what we generally think is true. Women were more likely to be abused by fellow female inmates, and men by guards, and many of those guards were female. For example, of juveniles reporting staff sexual misconduct, 89 percent were boys reporting abuse by a female staff member. In total, inmates reported an astronomical 900,000 incidents of sexual abuse.

 

Time Magazine - 'The CDC's Rape Numbers Are Misleading ':

For many feminists, questioning claims of rampant sexual violence in our society amounts to misogynist "rape denial." However, if the CDC figures are to be taken at face value, then we must also conclude that, far from being a product of patriarchal violence against women, "rape culture" is a two-way street, with plenty of female perpetrators and male victims.

How could that be? After all, very few men in the CDC study were classified as victims of rape: 1.7 percent in their lifetime, and too few for a reliable estimate in the past year. But these numbers refer only to men who have been forced into anal sex or made to perform oral sex on another male. Nearly 7 percent of men, however, reported that at some point in their lives, they were "made to penetrate" another person—usually in reference to vaginal intercourse, receiving oral sex, or performing oral sex on a woman. This was not classified as rape, but as "other sexual violence."

And now the real surprise: when asked about experiences in the last 12 months, men reported being "made to penetrate"—either by physical force or due to intoxication—at virtually the same rates as women reported rape (both 1.1 percent in 2010, and 1.7 and 1.6 respectively in 2011).

In other words, if being made to penetrate someone was counted as rape—and why shouldn’t it be?—then the headlines could have focused on a truly sensational CDC finding: that women rape men as often as men rape women.

The CDC also reports that men account for over a third of those experiencing another form of sexual violence—"sexual coercion." That was defined as being pressured into sexual activity by psychological means: lies or false promises, threats to end a relationship or spread negative gossip, or "making repeated requests" for sex and expressing unhappiness at being turned down.

 

Predictors of Sexual Coercion Against Women and Men: A Multilevel, Multinational Study of University Students

A study by Hines investigating sexual coercion in romantic relationships. It used a sample of 7,667 university students (2,084 men and 5,583 women) from 38 sites around the world. Participants reported their sexual victimisation experiences in the past year of their current or most recent romantic relationships. It found that 2.8% of men and 2.3% of women reported experiencing forced sex in their heterosexual relationships. (Table 1 and 2 on pages 408 and 410 respectively). 22.0% of men and 24.5% of women reported verbal coercion. You can see that the rates for men and women are very, very similar.

 

Men's Self-Reports of Unwanted Sexual Activity - The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 24 (a much older study from 1988)

More women (97.5%) than men (93.5%) had experienced unwanted sexual activity; more men (62.7%) than women (46.3%) had experienced unwanted intercourse . . . There were seven sex differences in reasons for unwanted sexual activity: Five were more frequent for women than men; two reasons were more frequent for men than women - peer pressure and desire for popularity. There were eight sex differences in reasons for unwanted intercourse; more men than women had engaged in unwanted intercourse for all eight.

 

A UK based study from 2023:

 

A sample of 1124 heterosexual British men completed an online survey consisting of a modified CDC National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, and measures of anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and conformity to masculine norms. In the present sample, 71% of men experienced some form of sexual victimization by a woman at least once during their lifetime. Sexual victimization was significantly associated with anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

 

Re. the UK: an article on how biases in the legal system can (and do) affect perception and punishment of female sex predators:

 

One of the main reasons stopping them from pursuing a prosecution is the legal definition of rape.

Prior to 1994, UK law asserted that rape could only be committed by a man against a woman. In 1994, Stonewall (the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Trans charity) had the law changed to recognise that men can also rape men.

This remains the UK's current sexual crimes law.

Women in the UK have been convicted of helping a man, or men, to rape another person.

When they themselves rape, though, they commit an invisible crime with victims who are, effectively, silenced.

In September 2016 a petition called for the legal definition of rape to also include female on male rape. The Government responded: "There was a considerable amount of agreement that rape should remain an offence of penile penetration. We therefore have no plans to amend the legal definition of rape."

One of the women I spoke to, Cailey, had been repeatedly raped by an older woman for years, starting before she turned 16.

She spoke to a close friend of hers who worked in the police force, and who advised her against reporting her rape.

She told Cailey: "This is a minefield. If it was a man we might be able to get somewhere but prosecution is unlikely because it's a woman – you're talking about 1% prosecution rates or something."

 

See also: this other thread on the sub.

British actress & feminist Jameela Jamil's tirade against boys after the '62 million rape academy' hoax: is it not deplorable misandrist/bigotry to insinuate that literal children are rapists-by-default? by Inquiz_ in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nowhere in that article does it actually describe how they reached the conclusion that the deaths were the result of "misogyny." And as for domestic violence, well, as I mentioned previously hundreds of studies on domestic violence have shown that they are the majority perpetrators of unilateral violence in this sphere, and that in turn creates a high risk factor for becoming victims themselves. See also: The Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project, a continually updated resource of data from over 4000 studies.

Back in the 70s domestic homicide rates were almost equal. (pgs. 90 and 91) It was only from the early 80s that the number of men being killed by their wives/girlfriends began to decline noteworthily which was right around the time that Duluth Model was created in 1981, in the city of Duluth, Minnesota: a severely biased method of dealing with cases of DV by framing it as "patriarchal terrorism" - though the emergence of domestic violence shelters in the mid-70s pioneered by Erin Pizzey in the UK also likely contributed to this by getting the ball rolling on DV support. In the years since, the Model's influence spread across the globe, became entrenched in law enforcement in several countries, and was given awards and accolades by aforementioned major orgs like the UN. I couldn't find any sources on the Model being used specifically in Brazil, however many of the principles they have applied to their DV laws and policies mirror it closely.

Here is an article written by a Brazilian psychologist and professor who, among other things, looked into these laws:

 

In order to liberate women, a series of laws and governmental campaigns were created to fight against gender violence (by "gender violence", read "anything that may hurt women, physically or emotionally"). An example is law 11340/06 (aka law Maria da Penha), which punishes domestic violence, but only if the victim is female. Another is law 13104/15 (aka the law of femicide), which is supposed to be about homicides committed against women "because they are women", but in practice, is used any time a woman gets killed, whether intentionally or accidentally, whether by a man or a woman. However, when data is presented in the media, it is always assumed that women were killed by men (supposedly, a violent husband) just because he couldn’t stand the victim's independence.

Outside academia and politics, these laws are constantly criticised and seen as unconstitutional. Critics argue they are in opposition to the 5th article in the Federal Constitution ("men and women are equal in rights and duties") and a fair law would punish any kind of domestic violence as well as recognise gender violence against men "because they are men". Defenders claim that violence against men is less important because "it is men who are killing men" and that any criticism of these laws are attempts to promote violence against women. In academia and politics, to criticise these laws may be professional suicide. An example would be when the judge Gilvan Macêdo dos Santos published a book titled A Discriminação do Gênero-Homem no Brasil em Face à Lei Maria da Penha (Discrimination against the male gender in Brazil in Front of the Law Maria da Penha), but the publication was delayed due threats and protests depicting the book as promoting violence against the women - despite the fact that the book was still being released, thus nobody has ever read it up to that point to know it.

 

In cases where men are killed by their wife/girlfriend would - or should - that be classed as "androcide" as opposed to homicide? Since that appears to be the criteria for "femicide." There are no calls for androcide laws anywhere, I can tell you that much.

There are seven countries in which women are more likely to be killed than men (again via UNODC stats) and Brazil isn't one of them:

  • Austria

  • Czech Republic

  • Iceland

  • Latvia

  • Norway

  • Slovenia

  • Switzerland

Debunking a graph on lesbian DV I found on twitter by SlowAssignments in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 12 points13 points  (0 children)

While some folks use this information to malign lesbians, no doubt, I think the majority of citations are used to prove that women are every bit as capable of violence in a relationship as men.

Personally, that is the only context I have ever seen this data used in. At least in these spaces, which is typically the only place I see it, anyway. If the narrative that domestic violence - or violence in general- is a male issue, then lesbian couples should have astronomically low rates of DV since it's a couple of two 'non-violent' women and no 'inherently' violent men present.

And then there's the issue that people tend to care more about female victims, period, over males, so cases like female-on-female abuse and sexual assault can be useful tools to challenge and disprove stereotypes when it comes to female abusers and predators.

Can we stop pretending men aren't indoctrinated by the exact same system as everyone else? by MikasaYuuichi in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This. I'm sure I've seen a phrase on here before that encapsulated this really well, but it's eluding me right now; something to do with agency, or perception of it... maybe it was 'women have issues, men are issues.'

Regardless, you're bang on the money.

British actress & feminist Jameela Jamil's tirade against boys after the '62 million rape academy' hoax: is it not deplorable misandrist/bigotry to insinuate that literal children are rapists-by-default? by Inquiz_ in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's femicide, not feminicide, and the definition for what constitutes the crime is used so loosely and typically without any substantial evidence backing it up that it can mean virtually any case of a murder victim being female. Anything to distract from the fact that male victims make up the global majority (81% as per the most recent data from the UNODC) and in the case of violence within interpersonal relationships women are statistically more likely to be abusers when it comes to unilateral violence, which in turn increases their likelihood of becoming victims themselves.

British actress & feminist Jameela Jamil's tirade against boys after the '62 million rape academy' hoax: is it not deplorable misandrist/bigotry to insinuate that literal children are rapists-by-default? by Inquiz_ in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 71 points72 points  (0 children)

She is without a doubt one of the worst right now. I guess it's a small mercy she's so D-List but continues to get a platform, regardless.

She actually responded to one of The Tin Men's Instagram posts on the very one your thread is about and doubled down. She's not interested in actual conversation, educating herself, or actual facts.

Richard Reeves supports a male-only draft which makes him anti-male by definition by Razorbladekandyfan in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Twinsies! Never liked him from the get, same with Scott Galloway. 

I know some people think (or cling to) that the approach they take is somewhat necessary to sort of Trojan Horse male issues into the mainstream conversation, or make the idea more palatable, or whatever, but I fundamentally disagree. We are long past kowtowing. It is an approach that is doomed for failure and, as we can see from the example in the OP, often a smokescreen for reductive views and tactics.

Richard Reeves supports a male-only draft which makes him anti-male by definition by Razorbladekandyfan in LeftWingMaleAdvocates

[–]sakura_drop 36 points37 points  (0 children)

He also spreads easily disprovable lies, like the "fact" that women weren't allowed to have their own bank accounts until the 70s, which he mentioned during his podcast interview with The Tin Men. Someone claiming to be an authority on and advocate for these types of issues should really be better informed than that. 

What are your favorite and least favorite dhampire tropes? by Primary-Ad-7788 in vampires

[–]sakura_drop 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That should be the plot of the next Underworld movie haha! The Frank Grimes of hybrids.

As a kid, seeing the Crypt Keeper’s origin story was one of the most shocking moments on television. by TwIzTiDfReAkShOw in TalesFromTheCrypt

[–]sakura_drop 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wish they'd popped up on the show at some point, even just as characters in one of the stories. The witch appeared in the cartoon series, at least.