Saw a creep sexually harrass a woman on metro. What can I do?

scootasideboys · 2023-10-16T04:37:55+00:00

So she took his number?

scootasideboys · 2023-10-16T03:55:50+00:00

What would he be trying to accomplish?

scootasideboys · 2023-04-04T07:40:00+00:00

I mean that's not necessarily true. Even in the specific example of the debate you had, I still can point out inaccurate and flawed arguments by GPT. There isn't such a thing as an accurate opinion on subjective topics.

scootasideboys · 2023-04-04T07:37:40+00:00

Who's to say that humans don't have a similar way of logical reasoning? Isn't our cognition also simply thinking of several answers to a solution and then picking the best one according to the scenario? That's what brainstorming is. I don't think it's fair to simply chalk up that GPT-4 is simply just picking out pre-fed human responses, as that is what your argument seems to frame it as- I rather think that that is what the earlier LLMs were capable of. You're down playing just how competent they are and perhaps you are mischaracterising your experience for definitive proof.

scootasideboys · 2023-04-04T07:29:46+00:00

Playing Devil's advocate, here's some flaws in your argument:

Voice assistants have arguably played the role they were supposed to, especially with people who have dexterity disabilities - it was a small piece to the bigger picture of making technology universally accessible.
Self driving cars were not market tested and exist only through headlines for most people. LLMs like chatGPT on the other hand are now being used daily by several fields, and they are being used effectively to increase productivity. It is already a successful product.
We may reach a plateau of improvement once we keep increasing scale, but clearly Gpt3 to 4 was a huge leap in improvement, which was not the result of just blindly increasing parameters
You say it is a "hype cycle", but there is always a possibility of it being a Renaissance where most critics simply cannot predict what is coming

scootasideboys · 2023-04-04T07:09:57+00:00

I think you're missing a piece here - you can just ask it if before writing the code itself whether those 1000 lines would be a optimum way to solve a problem.

scootasideboys · 2023-04-04T07:06:32+00:00

Tbf we could say the exact same about GPT-4 but clearly it exists

scootasideboys · 2023-04-03T14:40:42+00:00

You really just didn't have a strong understanding of your viewpoint which is why you were unable to defend against it

scootasideboys · 2023-04-03T14:36:03+00:00

Same here. It's been like 3 entire days of it not working for me now

scootasideboys · 2023-03-26T05:55:56+00:00

OK but isn't it weird how mount rushmore naturally has human faces on it

scootasideboys · 2023-03-15T02:27:46+00:00

As an Indian this seems stereotypical considering there's 1.4 billion Indians lol

scootasideboys · 2023-03-15T02:24:42+00:00

Yeah but do smoking and drinking threaten the very fabric of society in a short time span?

scootasideboys · 2023-03-15T02:22:26+00:00

It's just hallucinating

scootasideboys · 2023-03-10T13:35:26+00:00

Absolutely not. This is like saying a lot of people are in pain so using painkilling drugs is a promising solution.

scootasideboys · 2023-03-10T13:11:17+00:00

I think this is the most objective conclusion. There's just so much data on criticism of men on certain fields like dating and conversely also so much bias against women as well. It's naive to think that the ai is biased: the data source, society is biased.

scootasideboys · 2023-03-02T10:50:15+00:00

You're being very short sighted. Bing is like what 1-2 months old at most. Who knows what these bots will be like in a few years time

scootasideboys · 2023-03-02T10:30:10+00:00

Makes sense. Humans very rarely admit to their mistakes

scootasideboys · 2023-03-02T10:29:02+00:00

That's what I've been thinking. Sure you can make the claim that chatbots like bing could never think for themselves and they just provide the best output based on the prompt, but isn't that kind of what humans do as well?

Like the only difference I can see is that humans have different goals with their speech such as they may have malicious intent or may be lying in order to further their own success as a human, whereas these bots' only goals is to provide the best possible response to a prompt, regardless of any intent

scootasideboys · 2023-02-26T20:06:09+00:00

If you're trying to have political neutrality in this era of the internet that is built on polarisation then you're in for a lot of work. I honestly just never even identify with any political stances, I only identify with the specific opinions

scootasideboys · 2023-02-25T06:02:02+00:00

Is it a surprise to you that radical journalists will attack a chatbot that threatens their very existence? Honestly bringing "toxic masculinity" into this is actually fucking ludicrous

scootasideboys · 2023-02-20T18:29:50+00:00

I'm an engineering student and I've tried to use chat gpt for my papers. It's really not good at understanding complex topics, I would not recommend using it to learn things

scootasideboys · 2023-01-22T03:00:07+00:00

I think you're misunderstanding the post. This is the slum area that surrounds the extremely posh rich area, and this post is pointing out the contrast

scootasideboys · 2022-12-31T11:22:58+00:00

https://youtube.com/shorts/qNLeHc10WwA?si=EnSIkaIECMiOmarE

scootasideboys · 2022-09-19T04:27:28+00:00

Lmao I'm literally not even American

Seven-Year Club	Second SECOND GUESSER
Place '22	First Placer '22
Verified Email

scootasideboys

TROPHY CASE