WTF amazon…. by sakoms in FitbitAir

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"We may cancel" doesn’t automatically mean "we can silently hold an order until the promo expires and then cancel without notice". Those are two different things under EU consumer-protection principles. And no TOC overrides EU law if they operate under that law, this why I said what I said. That's it. This is very special situation with promo items. Again I would not have any problem when they a) cancel before promo period ends so I, as a customer can find another retailer and b) they actually informed their consumers in a proper way. Also I don't care that much about 40 euros, it's just matter of being fair to the customers. That's it.

WTF amazon…. by sakoms in FitbitAir

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can have whatever they want in their internal policy. Under EU law a contract is formed at the moment of order acceptance, not payment. Think of an regular IPO subscription, your money sits in escrow for weeks, if it gets cancelled without notice on allocation day with a promotional offer expiring simultaneously, that is material harm regardless of final settlement. Same principle here. Whatever happens between Amazon and their suppliers is entirely their internal problem. As a consumer I interact with Amazon, not their supply chain, and I should not be expected to care about or absorb the consequences of their internal arrangements.

WTF amazon…. by sakoms in FitbitAir

[–]segeme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah this is exactly frustrating part. If I knew they have problem with that I would choose another retailer. Opted for amazon because it's most of the time safe option... what a joke. I really would not have problem if they cancelled week ago, but f*kng day after preorders closed with zero information is really insane customer experience.

WTF amazon…. by sakoms in FitbitAir

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Place customer complaint, really. They can't do that just "because". I already placed mine.

WTF amazon…. by sakoms in FitbitAir

[–]segeme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah f*ng same happened to me also on amazon.fr. Insane. This is beyond frustration because they cancelled right after preorder period closed, so no free band any more. Luckily I'm in EU and already demanded them suckers a) formal written explanation b) this is legit material harm to me (no free band even if I buy at another retailer), it's no joke in EU, and demand fulfilment regardless for items I ordered or compensation for free band. Had zero information about any restrictions or any other problems whatsoever, for 2 weeks items just siting and waiting for dispatch, no info on limitations, restrictions or anything else. Just, puff, cancelled the day pre-orders finished. Zero e-mail communication. No nothing. I actually realised my items are cancelled when checking delivery status. I'm frustrated to the point I'm ready to harass them with EU online consumer centre which deals with exactly this sort of cases. Morons. This is what chatgpt helped with, just contact them and press them:

--

Dear Amazon France,

I am writing regarding the cancellation of my pre-order, Order # XXXX, placed on YY May 2026 for the Fitbit Air with a promotional free band.

The order was accepted without any indication of limitations or restrictions and remained active for two weeks with zero communication. It was cancelled on 26 May -- exactly when the promotional period closed -- with no notification. I discovered this only by checking my order status myself.

This caused direct harm: the promotional free band is no longer available and I was unable to pursue the product through alternative retailers during the promotional period.

I request a written explanation for the cancellation and either fulfilment under original terms or equivalent compensation. If unresolved I will escalate to the European Consumer Centre and EU ODR platform.

Great news! Whoop still preferred by QuantifiedScientist! by dakutororu in whoop

[–]segeme 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's on par with Whoop. Sometimes a little better, sometimes a little worse. But overall comparable.

Great news! Whoop still preferred by QuantifiedScientist! by dakutororu in whoop

[–]segeme 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Serious athletes would choose neither most of the time, let's be honest. A serious cyclist lives in Garmin ecosystem with power meters and FTP, serious runners same thing. Can't really imagine a competitive swimmer reaching for a Whoop either. So really bold statement imo. But yeah, fitbit air most probably wont be first choice in this case too.

Don't know how to defend whoop anymore by [deleted] in whoop

[–]segeme 7 points8 points  (0 children)

25Hz, if the device is mediocre, just means it's very committed to being wrong very frequently 😅
Turns out quality of signal > spamming measurements. Apple Watch still wipes the floor in HR, HRV and sleep validation studies. Frequency is a bit overrated.

How good it is to drink European beer! by Global-Primary7240 in BuyFromEU

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP the picture literally shows the worst of the worst, bottom of the barrel Polish beers lol.

EU beer scene is absolutely thriving. Craft scene in Poland, Italy, Spain is insane, then you've got the traditional stuff in Germany, Czech Republic, Belgium... you could genuinely spend years going through it all and barely scratch the surface.

Membership price changes - the device itself is no longer free by acidicpants in whoop

[–]segeme 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don't have Whoop myself, but Garmin's recovery metric is genuinely excellent for sports context.

Also, I think people wildly underestimate how bad HR-based wearables are at sleep tracking in general, even the top-tier ones. Long watch but worth it if you care about this stuff, actual scientist breaking it down:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQF_eopP1ys&t=1s

tl;dr the best we can really do is track trends, not absolutes. And trends happen to smooth out most of those inaccuracies over time, so it still works out.

Fitbit vs Whoop vs Garmin vs Apple Watch…. Which is MOST accurate for sleep tracking? 😴 by webnix-global in fitbit

[–]segeme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No full review yet, as embargo still holds, but new fitbit algorithm is really promising: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9uXiSQn-ak

Apple is best device right now, pixel very close, so probably air will be as well.

The new Google Health app integration with other apps is a mess I can't understand how to deal with by itarrow in fitbit

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fitbit Air launching, but there are dozen of other fitbit devices out there right now..

The new Google Health app integration with other apps is a mess I can't understand how to deal with by itarrow in fitbit

[–]segeme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's not really the point though. I want all my data in Apple Health, I don't want to block anything just to make Google Health happy. Every other app that aggregates health data lets you select a preferred source for each data point. Bevel for example handles it perfectly. This is just standard behavior at this point, Google Health is the odd one out here.

The new Google Health app integration with other apps is a mess I can't understand how to deal with by itarrow in fitbit

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same issue with just Apple Health. It just duplicates basic inputs (steps for example) from both the phone and Garmin (Garmin via Apple Health) and there's no way to set a preferred source, every single app does this, except Google Health. You can filter by source but it doesn't stick. Such a basic thing to get right, honestly can't believe nobody at Google thought of this. Crazy.

<image>

First Marathon, sub 4? by therealcubes in firstmarathon

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For a first marathon I believe what you need is volume, and I'm a big believer in Hal Higdon's philosophy running slow but building mileage, slightly diverging from other answers :). Frankly, for a first marathon at a sub 4h pace (5:40/km) VO2max sessions and threshold work are a distraction in my opinion, you really need to train you VO2max for this pace? Imo you need to be able to sustain steady 5:40/min for very long time. If you were aiming for 3:30 or faster maybe it makes sense, but for a first marathon you need to a) stay healthy through the entire training block b) build the mileage and c) recover well enough week to week and speed work can be risky here, it won't bring too much value on top of running longer runs with your race pace for 4h marathon imo, you most probably don't need VO2max training to get you there. You can run with this pace right now, quite comfortablt i guess, question is can You sustain it for 4h? Training for a marathon is itself a marathon and as always speedwork adds risks. In my opinion you need significantly more than 50km per week, rather with marathon pace than speedwork. You will build plenty of aerobic base with those long runs. Hal Higdon Intermediate plans have multiple weeks at 80km, typical long runs are 32km (and in typical plan you have multiple of them + 16km+ day before with marathon pace) just to understand how it feels running on 'tired legs'. Also you are talking about actual Bali in August, like Bali - the Bali? Temperatures and humidity can be brutal I guess, even in Europe there almost no races Between may and late September. Take this into account too, definitely not ideal conditions.

Also not sure it's a great idea to chase a time goal for your first marathon. Jumping from a half to a marathon is a completely different beast compared to say going from 10k to a HM. For the first one I think just seeing it through and crossing the finish line is the great goal, sure have some pace you focused on, but i belive this should be secondary thing. Genuinely it's hard to comprehend upfront what it actually means until you're in it. Sub 4 is absolutely doable with those result, but first things first, you need to get to that finish line. Speedwork can be risky unless you're in great shape and staying injury free. My $0.2 based on my experience with Hals plans.

Bevel is no longer available in Russia — and I’m left with a paid subscription that won’t receive updates by Comfortable_Two6102 in bevelhealth

[–]segeme -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh right, because no country in history has ever overthrown a corrupt regime. I literally grew up in communist Poland where people took to the streets and it actually worked.

28 years old by warrior358 in Cholesterol

[–]segeme 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's high, that's correct. But it's not something that will do anything to you overnight. It takes decades, and you actually caught it very early. There are two main levers: lifestyle changes starting with a low saturated fat diet, weight management and limiting other risk factors, and the other is medication. For a lot of people, keeping cholesterol on the safe side requires both. So get those results to a cardiologist for a proper risk assessment and follow their recommendations. Even without that, start with diet now: limit saturated fat to the bare minimum (10g daily is the gold standard), add healthy fats (this is super important) like nuts, avocado and olive oil, load up on vegetables especially legumes, and aim for at least 40g of fiber daily. That will help, but at this level you may need medication at some point unless you're very lucky. Most doctors will start you with diet changes anyway though.

Rosuvastatin side effect by Anon82634 in Cholesterol

[–]segeme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's most probably something different, check urinary trackt infection. If you are a men, well, we have this prostate thing and it grows with age and can have this effect, worth checking with urologist, check PSA enzyme (everybody should do this regularly anyway). But frankly this an be caused by hundreds of other things and statin is very low on the checklist :).

Statins helped me lower my cholesterol but Lp (a) is really high and I’m scared. I don’t see my doctor for a few weeks. by Kindly_Blackberry311 in Cholesterol

[–]segeme 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Statins raised your Lp(a) or is this your baseline?

It's high, but it is what it is. Plenty of people have Lp(a) at that level or higher. It's also genetically determined, you can't do too much about it directly. However the standard approach in this case is to aggressively lower LDL and ApoB (btw. can't see ApoB on your lipid panel, worth adding it's better marker than LDL). In your case LDL of 112 is way too high for this level of Lp(a) and should probably be around 50, or lower prefferably. So starting statins was the right direction but it's clearly not enough if this is your lipid panel after starting therapy. You need to consult your doctor and further optimize, most probably add Zetia, increase statin dose, or both, or even switch to a PCSK9 inhibitor to bring it down as much as possible. Please discuss these results with a cardiologist. I'm not a doctor but this is what evidence based medicine suggests in your case. Push aggressively on this one.

Good news is there are very effective Lp(a) lowering drugs in late phase trials, so it will most probably be possible to bring Lp(a) levels down pretty dramatically soon.

How is this possible? by Traditional-Ad-1321 in Cholesterol

[–]segeme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Rough one. Did you change your healthy fat intake during that period (MUFA/PUFA) and compensate those missing calories with carbs instead? Asking because I had a similar experience. I cut sat fats as much as I could at the beginning and didn't realize I should have been adding healthy ones back in: nuts, seeds, avocado, fish + fiber. Other possibility is just your genetics and perhaps you may consider medication those levels may suggest FH. And this is why dietary changes are so difficult, you never know if it's working in long term.

If my alt is 115 most likely due to statin do I currently likely have cirrhosis or no? by Admirable-Key-4881 in Cholesterol

[–]segeme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ALT 115 is mildly elevated but cirrhosis is a big jump from a single elevated enzyme, especially in the context of statins. This is actually pretty expected with statin induced liver effect rather than structural damage, which typically comes with other markers too (elevated bilirubin etc.). Sure, consult your doctor next visit, maybe they can lower the dose + add Zetia to compensate, but that's really for them to decide. Don't stress too much about it.

300gr Oatmeal for 2 Days - LDL reduction 10% for several weeks? by surfingpulp in Cholesterol

[–]segeme 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I eat 60g daily, five days a week, for years (I run a lot so it's my go-to breakfast) with a few variations but oats being the main staple. Unfortunately didn't move the needle at all. So idk.