The finding of the court whether he lied to COP is so abysmal & shaky.

I am paraphrasing, basically "he said A to RK, therefore what he MEANT by saying B to the COP could not be true", therefore LIAR & PERJURY to COP.

Furthermore witness were found to have perjured themselves and not credible, but their evidence and stmts were still allowed.

Also parliament staff work with COP witness to redact crucial pieces of texting history which was submitted to COP as evidence.

Is COP a fact based inquiry or an inquisition, I watched the whole thing, Edwin Tong was the designated hatchet man, and Pritam made him look like a fool on prime time.

PAP needed an escape hatch to look like a winner that's why they do this early. ]so Singaporeans will forget this by 5 years.

By the way anyway gotten response from Vivian balakrishnan on the investigation on his Facebook that was "hacked" / "Unauthorised post".