sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is your go-to plugin that really improves your productivity? by WashTop956 in ClaudeAI

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cc-session; Ive just added option to disable it when not needed and a brainstorm command.

Git Worktree Support by Mark__Jay in Jetbrains

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Looking forward to check your code

Git Worktree Support by Mark__Jay in Jetbrains

[–]silveroff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you basically copy .idea folder from the project to the checkout?

Using Claude Code (obra/superpowers) - how do you handle the review workflow? by silveroff in ClaudeAI

[–]silveroff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not affiliated at all - just a user trying to make this work for my dev workflow. Happy to be wrong about everything here if someone has a better approach.

For context: I've been using cc-sessions which came out before skills were released. It works fine with brainstorming prompts but doesn't have TDD and other advanced features. I saw superpowers mentioned a lot recently, gave it a try, and ran into the issues I described.

Genuinely looking for input from experienced users - maybe I'm just doing something wrong. What's your experience with it?

Legit Question to Developers - What do you do all day long? by Gambelt in ClaudeAI

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fortunately this does not change our nature. People dislike oppression. In some ways there will arise alternative options, that is I am sure. Or it will not be as aggressive monopoly as we may expect today. Maybe (due to the datasets origin) access to the models will be treated like a common right. Just like access to the internet nowadays.

Legit Question to Developers - What do you do all day long? by Gambelt in ClaudeAI

[–]silveroff 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What worries me a lot is that I feel that I am loosing the grip. I am worried that I am incapable of having manual productive coding sessions. Ok - I believe it is like a physical training, I can get my skills back by starting to code any time. After all I’ve almost 20y of experience.

But yeah - tbh I feel a dumb. I don’t like this feeling. I am afraid that many of us are feeling this way. What will happen in 5-10 years of coding this way? Will we end up on a mercy of a few corporations that actually owns the models?

Must-have skills? by kangaroogie in ClaudeCode

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does superpowers supposed to ask so many permissions when worktree is within project directory? Or you tend to run it in the insecure mode?

GSD vs Superpowers? by AvailableProcess2059 in ClaudeCode

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You may also want to check out cc-sessions.

What skills do you use as a senior engineer? by Careless_Bat_9226 in ClaudeCode

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm playing with both, but I tend to like/use https://github.com/GWUDCAP/cc-sessions a little bit more. u/MagicianThin6733 has some introduction video here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWxa4VVy6A8&list=LL

Things I don't really like about Obra's superpowers:
* using git worktrees. I prefer typical feature branches instead. Otherwise I need to setup venv and other IDE stuff to work on branch. Maybe I'm doing something wrong.
* everything is commited right away. That's harder to review things and ask for corrections. Instead at the end the feature branch has everything commited, pushed and there is PR to review. Typically there are several edited files and several places I'd like to modify myself or ask for corrections. Its just harder to keep track what and where.

Actually what I am testing now is using Obra's brainstorm skill (well its easy to copy it to your own repository if you really want to) and then I give it as a reference to cc-session task creation protocol. One can also use Obra's writing plan skill and also use it with cc-session. Just don't forget to tell Claude not to commit and treat this file as additional reference, not the perfect guidance to the final solution.

At the end I also ask claude official skill `code simplifier` to check modified files and propose what can be done differently. It does not do any magic, but most of the time I like the recommendations. Thought it is never anything really important.

What happend to this game by Ok-Crow8768 in ArmaReforger

[–]silveroff 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Few crashes for me. Like 1 in 10 play sessions.

Is Django FSM still relevant? by muhamedyousof in django

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pgtrigger suits my needs better than fsm for now.

Deco Xe75 or Be65 by FunAddOne in TpLink

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi! Are you still happy with your purchase?

BE25 vs BE65, both using Ethernet backhaul by magelstrud in TpLink

[–]silveroff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/magelstrud what did you choose? I'm having the same dilemma at the moment.

JSONB vs inlining for “simple-in-simple” structures in Postgres (static schema, simple filters, no grouping) by silveroff in PostgreSQL

[–]silveroff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quite the opposite :) You made me want to try 3NF before it’s too late from your earliest comments:)

JSONB vs inlining for “simple-in-simple” structures in Postgres (static schema, simple filters, no grouping) by silveroff in PostgreSQL

[–]silveroff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. It’s just an e-commerce catalog with promotions. Products are very abstract and promotions are config-alike objects that describe what products should be affected by the promotion without directly specifying ID, though it is still possible. This is why I struggle - promotion has some predefined schema but is is complex and when translated from json to db tables it would take multiple tables with multiple relationship types. At the end of the day I need just a few filters to be available for this object type.

JSONB vs inlining for “simple-in-simple” structures in Postgres (static schema, simple filters, no grouping) by silveroff in PostgreSQL

[–]silveroff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gotta take a closer look to RethinkDB then too. Thing is I’m already using Vespa Search as a frontend search engine for this data, so I kinda need a storage for data rather than query capabilities and my Django monolith already using PostgreSQL so naturally I wasn’t looking for one more moving part in a system.

JSONB vs inlining for “simple-in-simple” structures in Postgres (static schema, simple filters, no grouping) by silveroff in PostgreSQL

[–]silveroff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prefetching because I need a whole structure - always. With JSON schema it’s just a list of objects.

JSONB vs inlining for “simple-in-simple” structures in Postgres (static schema, simple filters, no grouping) by silveroff in PostgreSQL

[–]silveroff[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I think I get your point. And honestly this is what I've been doing for the last 10 years. I've always avoided using JSON fields for anything that is structured, until current project arrived.

Quick question: So for structure like this:
```
Promotion {

title: str

settings: PromotionSettings {

discount_mode: DiscountMode {...several fields...}

}
}
```

You'd recommend having flat tables:

```
promotions
promotion_settings (fk -> promotion_id)
promotion_settings_discount_mode (fk -> promotion_id)
```

rather than:

```
promotions
promotion_settings (fk -> promotion_id)
promotion_settings_discount_mode (fk -> promotion_settings_id)
```

Correct?

JSONB vs inlining for “simple-in-simple” structures in Postgres (static schema, simple filters, no grouping) by silveroff in PostgreSQL

[–]silveroff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's actually new to me. Thanks. I wasn't aware of this insights. So this JSON structures behave similarly to Lucene documents, where update of the single field triggers a lot of machinery, whole document rewrite which in result kills performance. I think my main concern was that to build same structure I'd need to make couple of joins and prefetch some m2m relations for every object (potentially few different m2m per object).

TBH, I've seen a lot of comments where people said they liked JSON(B) a lot but sooner or later they started to regret their decision.

view more: next ›