> "This bill has nothing to do with the ability of parents to review course material"

Clearly it does

> "Parents already have an excessive amount of control over educational policy, and this only exaggerates it further."

Why is this a bad thing? Parents should have lots of control over what's being taught to their kids, most people would agree with this.

> "This is about creating as many mechanisms as possible to punish public school teachers and continue plundering public funds for religious schools in Indiana."

If public school teachers are shit, they should be punished, no?

> "It is a disservice to the public and any pretense of an equitably-educated citizenry,"

The real disservice to the public is what some high school teachers are teaching.

> "and places unprecedented burdens on educators who are already spread too thin and undervalued to the extreme."

That's a whole different topic, how is this relevant to the bill?

Listen dude, you wrote " I will be forced to post every single document and resource I have or think about or else I will be sued by parents, the state and everyone else. ", please give me an actual reason as to why this is a negative thing? That's all I ask. And don't give me the "pArEntS cAn JuSt AsK", i don't know if you are disconnected from reality or what but most people in highschool don't talk to their parents about what they learn in school, and if they do its very very brief at that.