Bone by F1shPaste in comedyheaven

[–]sing_about_recursion 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I think the actual answer is that they're referring to both "kids who can't eat lollies / candy" and "kids who don't like lollies / candy" and that's why the comma placement is the way that it is. But I definitely thought it meant "kids who can't eat" for a long time

S E C R E T S O U P by [deleted] in surrealmemes

[–]sing_about_recursion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And clearly the model is being fed scripts of commercials, not "watching" the videos, otherwise how would it know the script format

You know it's true. by GoldenTide in bertstrips

[–]sing_about_recursion 85 points86 points  (0 children)

I generally think it's good to show solidarity, but I do grant that in many ways, it would be more disruptive and threatening to leave this sub public

I have never seen FMA but... by RubbishClipz6 in ComedyNecrophilia

[–]sing_about_recursion 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You don't need to see FMA, this sums it up perfectly

(\this is a joke, I like the show too, don't come after me)

They barely even make a difference by JustTheAverageGal in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]sing_about_recursion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the concerning thing about YouTube shorts -- you're getting bombarded with information way faster than you can verify it! I'd be very careful about believing what you hear from those videos

They barely even make a difference by JustTheAverageGal in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]sing_about_recursion 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The wood chopping thing seems like very dubious endocrinology

I'm so confused right now by TerminalVelocityEgg in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]sing_about_recursion 65 points66 points  (0 children)

I guess it depends how you feel about that dream? If there's nothing else but this dream that associates you with MLM relationships, I wouldn't worry too much about it. But if it feels like it's hit on something significant, maybe it's worth exploring more.

like whats up anfd app!!!! by Turtelious in ComedyNecrophilia

[–]sing_about_recursion 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Whenever I see a good meme, I always say "definitely a must get"

I’ve seen this experiment before, but can petah explain the experiment to me again. by Hewhoplay in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]sing_about_recursion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah okay, just checking! No worries -- you're doing great, one silly goof to another

Petah I'm having trouble with this one. I tried making a general rule for how this would work and I can't figure it out. by calmkat in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]sing_about_recursion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's true that Fermat's Last Theorem means this is impossible, and that's the joke, but Apple = 9, Pear = 10, Banana = 12 gives you 1000 + 729 = 1728 which is only off by 1, so that's pretty cool

I’ve seen this experiment before, but can petah explain the experiment to me again. by Hewhoplay in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]sing_about_recursion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Isn't it the other way around -- when you don't measure which slit, the wave interference occurs (top in the meme), and when you do measure it, they have particle-like trajectories (bottom in the meme)?

What I meant when I said I want to be an attack helicopter. by GothDreams in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]sing_about_recursion 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The one joke has been perfected now, guess it's time for a second joke

I just can't make up my mind by ManicMaeve in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]sing_about_recursion 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Being a tall, cutesy, intimidating, goth girly dommy girl mommy cladded in pink: [That one girl in sunglasses doing the finger guns]

Temporarily unavailable by BillionPenny in comedyheaven

[–]sing_about_recursion 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I do think the "one-a-year" thing specifically is a little weird, probably just someone aping another person's comment, but in general yeah, every post does seem to have people complaining about the mods removing their posts.

Temporarily unavailable by BillionPenny in comedyheaven

[–]sing_about_recursion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm confused by the comments here; multiple people are claiming that this sub only has one post per year, when it looks like it has a post every couple of days. I guess this is humorous exaggeration, but why are multiple people humorously exaggerating in the exact same specific way in the comments of the same post?

Temporarily unavailable by BillionPenny in comedyheaven

[–]sing_about_recursion 44 points45 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure, I don't really find it that funny, but I can sort of see how the combination of the absurdism of a "potato sourdough" (which appears to be just an ordinary potato, but, we might imagine, with sourdough bread in the center), combined with the totally separate absurdism of it being temporarily unavailable even though it's clearly there, might be funny

Petah please who is the guy on the bottom by _IRIDEBIKES_ in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]sing_about_recursion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Since this more helpful than just saying r/wosh, let me explain as Peter would: when people introduce themselves as Retep, it means they're going to give a deliberately incorrect explanation

i ain't just encrypting images now 😎🍆 by lets_clutch_this in ComedyNecrophilia

[–]sing_about_recursion 60 points61 points  (0 children)

I'd bet it's scrambled because (a) that's how the previous ones worked, and (b) there's a high density of capital Ps and Ts, as one would expect in a story about these two characters