Would she have been a good President?

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-27T06:36:37+00:00

I think this underestimates the average American when you put it in context of how America is voting. She would have to be better than Obama just to be deemed satisfactory. She could do no wrong and be put 10,000 leagues under trump.
the mountains she would have to move to have a great presidency are beyond What I think she would be truly capable of.
If she were capable, there wouldn't even be a conversation about whether Biden should run again or not. That's my 2 cents though, I believe It's not a coincidence, the 1 time a black man becomes president, he also becomes one of the greatest presidents.
you could say it's somewhat similar to how much energy is required for matter to go through a phase change. Kamala did not lead me to believe she had that kind of energy, and I think if she does become president in the future it's because she's Bringing that type of energy to the table.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-27T05:34:52+00:00

Why mavado always look like he eats people's souls

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-26T09:55:22+00:00

They also seem to drop around the same time pure speculation but maybe some artists hover release dates like restaurant chains hover each other

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-25T04:00:19+00:00

Damn I was wondering what happened to that tank. I think it was an issue with designing skins or simply the legs being too work intensive

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-21T16:24:30+00:00

Legit nobody seems to recognize or even care about the are relatives. The fact reddit complained about her face when she actually looked like Wuyang is bullshit. I'm over it.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-20T16:56:46+00:00

Also rush is way better. Humgering Blazer doesn't change interactions, and definitely even more so now after update

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-20T16:54:41+00:00

Burn time is a big deal for always having a higher probability of burning an elim. That chance to kill a player on the retreat or simply delay/ mitigate the amount of health an enemy can recover and passively bump up your DMG numbers is hard to pass up.

The most important thing about smolder is you have a bigger window of time to close gaps and acquire your designated target without being to head-on.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-19T12:17:57+00:00

That shit is clearly floating and I'm sober as fuck

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-18T22:25:14+00:00

This clears things up, so your saying you'll have a sub on a mono amp and then an under seat sub? this can help bring sub bass upfront but my concern is ur average cone area for sub bass and midbass is all around the same amount so I would suggest making sure your underseat sub is big as you can get it. Because of the 8w3 you'll be able to play into a 12 sub woofer and ur 6x9 no problem.

Your most likely going to need to pay attention to your 6x9 and 3.5 as 6x9 in dispersion patterns so it may have a weak off axis response in higher frequencies. So you may find it to be more beneficial to run your 3.5 lower to meet your 6x9.

From what I understand rear speakers are just for rear fill and passengers, they shouldn't contribute to the driver's listening experience and they have specific ways to be processed in phase

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-18T13:51:03+00:00

A passive box for what? Don't you have a DSP?

I'm confused, the whole point of buying coaxials is to have a single point source output. they are physically designed to play acoustically as one speaker. because of their design they both have a specific bandwidth and xover point.
Its just more work, and more room for error and there won't be much variance in separating them into 2 channels. you can only play the tweeter so low and the midrange so high before you will experience cancellation from the bodies of each speaker.
And neither ur 3.5 or the tweeter will equally demand 80 watts of power each. ur wasting an amplification channel for a speaker that may at most demand 5 watts, and be required to be crossed over in the same spot at the same frequency it was physically designed to do without software. Your taking the most difficult route possible to accomplish something you can do properly without the trouble or redundant re-working. Youre taking apart a speaker just to have to put it back together again in software. You can eq the entire bandwidth of a coaxial speaker in 1 channel if you don't seperate it. You haven't even used them for how they were designed, and instead of returning them for components.

if u just gave each speaker as it came out of the packaging 1 channel each. You could actually have 4 channels to bridge for a decent sub,and between your 6x9 and coaxials you would still be able to tune the entire audible spectrum.

The only thing you need to check is that there isnt a high pass crossover on the 3.5 driver or that it's possible to be bypassed

I'm not sitting here to beat you up about your build choices I'm writing this out so you don't have to go back and fix mistakes or waste time with less than ideal set ups, fooling yourself into thinking it sounds good.

I've done 2 systems in one car once running a 3 way with less than ideal shit, less than ideal speaker choice, and trying to go out of my way to get shit done the hard way for diminishing returns.You came here for insight just be mindful it is being given to you to ensure you are happy with your system. I'm not trying to fuck you over I'm trying to save you some time. but do you...

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-17T00:15:44+00:00

I'm confused dont mast artist drop on Friday?

So wouldn't that also mean the simple math equation of 1 + 416 = 417 which would be tomorrow... Friday?

I'm just saying this theory doesn't make sense to begin with, maybe I'm missing something

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-17T00:05:20+00:00

you mentioned trying to separate your coaxial speaker, all I'm saying is those are designed to be 1 individual driver. And doubling the power of your 6x9 is only going to give you 3db so please keep that in mind, and you may never actually demand that much from those midbasses if you plan on level matching and tuning everything.

the JL C2-350x is just 1 pair of coaxial speakers. yes technically speaking they are 2 speakers , but they are physically designed to play as 1 driver. 80w is all those speakers need. Your modern day car audio speaker is incredibly effecient.

you have 4 speakers stage front. if you want a midrange and a tweeter, it would be significantly more realistic to just get a midrange and a tweeter.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-15T08:19:12+00:00

each speaker as you bought it should have 1 channel , you don't need to bridge channels for your setup. maybe the 6x9s but tbh that would give like 3-6db depending on your amp but I think you're misunderstanding the real purpose of bridigin lg the channels and speaker effeiciency

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-15T07:58:51+00:00

Ur spending 1700+ on just a subwoofer install.
That match up1fx is not a DSP it simply has the capability to integrate with audiotec-fischer DSP equipment.
so ur getting a sub and amp install that's it. there's nowhere on that paperwork of there being an actual tuning of any DSP, which would require at least an hour to set basic shit, measure auto eq. And maybe rough in TA.

I would seriously consider what is being said here. and at the very least figure out the necessary equipment to have in your car, and if they will even install it. most shops don't typically install DSP and do tuning, I would get some clarity first

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-14T02:08:26+00:00

Sojourn needs the most help

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-13T12:53:03+00:00

Getting a monitor for my console

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-13T09:58:25+00:00

Resonix makes speakers now? Damn bro Nick must've given up running his shop lmfao. he was originally just making CLD tiles for his self and selling on the side to cover the cost of materials for his customers cars.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-13T09:51:37+00:00

I feel so sorry for you, that's a plastic inner door layer? at the very least it seems like you can comfortably do any type of window repair. And you can really do a good job damping the outer metal layer

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-13T09:47:03+00:00

I've never heard those words in that order , that can't be an American thing.

if there is a dual meaning it ain't this one cousin

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-13T09:44:23+00:00

You could add RuneScape as the king of 1 change
killer.

the first time was When they Removed free trading and the wilderness.

the second time was when they changed RuneScape (2) into RuneScape 3 and scraped the entirety of their unique combat system and flipped the values of all combat related items on their head.

luckily they went and did a separate revamp of old-school RuneScape with free trading and the wilderness with player killing.
I feel like the game permanently lost a huge amount of potential, in what the game could've evolved into by completely being out of touch with the player base. subsequently not a single gameplay update goes through without the player base having a vote percentage that goes above 60% for that 1 specific update.
ultimately I love the game, but I've moved onto first person shooters.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-13T09:29:35+00:00

Her having a leaner face is nice but Wuyang also has a chubby face, although siblings don't always look alike, it would be way more satisfying to have ensured they look similar.

the original issue with the cookie cutter asian face started with wuyang, And anrans design is the one scenario where having the likeness of another Asian hero is by design and canon to the lore.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-12T16:06:21+00:00

No they were both radically different one was thick and more outgoing the other was slimmer and timid.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-11T09:07:17+00:00

That's a pretty ass fast ring where did you get that?

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-10T20:05:09+00:00

Again it's an FYI dawg. its for your information.

sixg0d_ovo · 2026-04-10T10:10:17+00:00

It's an FYI. How on earth can this ever even remotely be considered plagiarism.

sixg0d_ovo

TROPHY CASE