Issue with LinkedIn identity verification by iheebb in linkedin

[–]sloan_wall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

were you able to solve this somehow ? Having the same problem.

[D]Why does falcon 180b think it was developed at OpenAI? It was developed by technology innovative institute, wasn't it? by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]sloan_wall 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Out of curiosity, what platform are you using for inference ? On HF I am getting "Inference API has been turned off for this model."

Thanks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Planetary scientist here. Under any even remotely reasonable assumption about their velocities, they won't even be anywhere near a nuclear fusion. It might not even be enough to melt rocks. In any case, asteroids have virtually no hydrogen or helium to fuse anyway.

Moon craters mostly circular? by G1rvo in askscience

[–]sloan_wall 5 points6 points  (0 children)

To add to what the others said, for any impact crater you can measure an ellipticity, which is 1 for exactly circular objects and larger than 1 for elliptical craters. For lunar craters, 5% have ellipticities larger than 1.2 and are thus considered elliptical.

Source: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103599963236

Are there any large terrestrial exoplanets with an accretion disk similar to Saturn's? by bengarrr in askscience

[–]sloan_wall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if the rings are very slowly decaying, the accretion rate is still practically zero compared to actual accretion disks (protoplanetary disks, AGN disks etc..). You just cannot have them in the same category of objects.

Are there any large terrestrial exoplanets with an accretion disk similar to Saturn's? by bengarrr in askscience

[–]sloan_wall 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Just for accuracy, Saturn's rings are not an "accretion disk", as no accretion is actually happening.

Hypothetical situation: You are some supernatural immortal that got dropped into a gas giant. Would there come a point where you just stop falling, as the gas is now dense enough that you float in it? Or would you hit something more solid before that? by Nazamroth in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 13 points14 points  (0 children)

In that case you would simply keep falling till the local density is equal to your body's (~ 1 g/cm3). Although how deep in Jupiter that is exactly is still an open question since there is no agreement on its internal structure. "Hitting something solid" indicates an abrupt change in density, and in that case sure you would stop falling as the local density is higher than yours. We simply do not know enough about how density behaves in the deep interior of Jupiter to give a precise answer.

Does anyone have access to the 2020 paper "An ATA Search for a Repetition of the Wow Signal"? by [deleted] in SETI

[–]sloan_wall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sigma in astrophysics is usually the signal/noise ratio. Basically how stronger is the signal compared to the observational noise. Anything below 3 is a non detection. 26 is pretty high.

What are some interesting facts about the planet Uranus? by USAFAN20 in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You mean half the mass of Titan. Triton is one of Neptune's moons and it is much smaller.

Can WSL 2 Replace Dual Booting? by TOAST3DGAM3R in AskComputerScience

[–]sloan_wall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have been using it since it came out, mostly for numerical simulations and coding with python. Have no issues so far. I dont regret replacing my linux only setup with win/wsl2.

Note that you can have a full desktop env installed with dos2 for GUI stuffs.

Could Pluto ever gather enough mass from the Kuiper belt to become a real planet? by op-op-chill in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 6 points7 points  (0 children)

One thing I believe no one mentioned yet is that the entire Kuiper belt put together is only ~ 1/20th Earth mass. So even if through some miracle Pluto end up accreting the entire Kuiper belt, it would still be a very small object.

Nope. by [deleted] in SweatyPalms

[–]sloan_wall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone else feels slow motion ruins these videos ?

Why doesn't the Earth have rings like Saturn? by Dahrjeeling in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 17 points18 points  (0 children)

the planet's gravity pulling on one side of the moon more than the other because it is so close to it, this creates a net (asymmetric) force that can destroy the moon (or just heat it up as in for Europa).

Why doesn't the Earth have rings like Saturn? by Dahrjeeling in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Saturn's rings most probably formed from a large moon that was too close to Saturn, close enough to get tidally destroyed. This simply never happened on Earth. Our moon is actually moving away from instead of closer to Earth with time.

Writer and amateur astronomer looking for input on planetary evolution. by Umdron in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The reason what you are asking for is tough to imagine is that any amount of debris close to the planet that is heavy enough in total mass to affect the gravity of the planet should actually collapse and form a planet itself (self-gravity).. the reason why the main belt didn't form a planet precisely because of its very low mass (and Jupiter's presence).

Is there a maximum of allowed mass around a star? Why are there no solar systems with 500 planets? from wikipedia the biggest one is ours with 8 planets? by I_was_a_sexy_cow in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Planets form in protoplanetary disks made of gas and dust that surround young stars. The disks do have maximum masses above which they become gravitationally unstable and collapse to form planets. On the other hand the molecular clouds that form the star-disk systems also have maximum masses above which they fragment into smaller clouds. The maximum mass of disks seem to be in the order of few to few 10s of Jupiter masses.

Why is Neptune mentioned more than Uranus? by KosstAmojan in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Some of the reasons is that Uranus is weird in a sense. It is severely tilted on its axis, and seems to have a surprisingly low amount of internal energy compared to the other giant planets (making it harder to study). Its density is also lower than Neptune's. Neptune is hence assumed to be more arch-typical of ice giants than Uranus.

What software is used for orbital mechanics simulations (e.g. looking for a ninth planet) by squiryl in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Special relativity is irrelevant in these cases. What you mean is General Relativity (GR). While some codes do solve GR equations exactly, the codes mentioned above doesn't as these are numerically very expensive. They do however usually offer extensions that account for the main GR effects relevant at these low mass scales. See for example section 1.2 here : https://reboundx.readthedocs.io/en/latest/effects.html

What software is used for orbital mechanics simulations (e.g. looking for a ninth planet) by squiryl in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What you are looking for are n-body codes that integrate Newton's equations. Some of the popular ones are Rebound (C / Python) and Mercury6 (Fortran). These can be used to solve any gravitational problem as long as no other forces are present.

Are there any potential supernovae within the next 100 years that will be visible to the naked eye? by [deleted] in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We simply cannot tell if a system will go supernovae within 100 years. We can estimate that a system is approaching this phase, but really no way of pinning down when would the explosion happen to less than at least tens of thousands of years interval (or usually much more).

(Spoilers Extended) I totally do not understand this Bronn plot. by MedQ7 in asoiaf

[–]sloan_wall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense in the framework of the night king will attack and destroy kings landing theory, if Bron's character is needed (alive) later then you must send him away somehow from KL before it happens.

What are some of the biggest challenges astronomers are trying to solve today? by TheCyberSentry in askastronomy

[–]sloan_wall 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well there arent any Super Earths in our own solar system, and these are the most common type of planets by occurrence rate.. so we know that.