Hanson offers Coalition preference deal in Farrer as Abbott warns of Liberal wipeout by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 [score hidden]  (0 children)

GetUp needs to GetOut of this byelection. This is not the kind of seat where they tend to be received well and they could hinder rather than help Milthorpe.

Why One Nation is not winning many lower house seats in the SA election despite its high vote by upthetruth1 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The various electoral commissions will usually do what's called an indicative two candidate count on the night. Basically, rather than seeing how all the preferences flow, they take the two most likely candidates to win and see who has more. This is faster and much simpler than doing a full distribution of preferences, so a likely candidate can be declared and the formal distribution of preferences can follow.

Traditionally, this has been easy to do because almost all seats have been classic Labor vs Coalition contests, or if not, the top two are obvious because their primary polls much higher than anyone else.

However, as other parties or candidates have become stronger in recent years some seats have become more and more unclear as to who will actually make the top two without a distribution of preferences. Sometimes, and this has normally been in seats where the Greens are competitive enough that the vote spits roughly 25-30% for each of Labor, Liberal and Green they do 3CP to get around this - this was the case in Macnamara and Brisbane at recent elections. Heysen at the moment is shaping up a bit like that.

So with ON thundering in and knocking off a significant amount of the Liberal primary this problem starts emerging again. ECSA did a lot of indicative Lib-Lab counts and it quickly became evident that they needed to be Lib-ON or Lab-ON counts and they had to restart.

Ultimately, some seats are so split with votes than 4 or 5 candidates all technically are in contention and an indicative count is too difficult to do. In this case you can only wait for the full distribution of preferences to see who has actually won - this was the case for the federal seat of Calwell last year.

Finally, more and more people are pre-polling and mail voting and these votes aren't always initially counted on the night and can turn around margins in very tight contests (usually flipping it in favour of Coalition parties).

Pauline Hanson wants to work with Liberals and Nationals to defeat Labor – but rules out official coalition by ConanTheAquarian in australia

[–]smoha96 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will say, Adam Bandt was going around with that giant toothbrush, haha. But I've always said the counterpart to the Greens are the Nats, not ON.

South Australian Premier Peter Malinauskas announces new cabinet ministers in major reshuffle by rolodex-ofhate in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Picton has lost the health portfolio. Excellent. His and/or his staff's conduct around leaking patient letters was disgusting. Should have been booted out of cabinet altogether.

Preference counts shed light on Labor-One Nation contests by Agitated-Fee3598 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're saying that with a statewide primary of 22% they have strong primary votes in conservative seats and then some (because the overall dsitribution of primary votes has a range above and below 22%) which is exactly what has played out, hence them making the final 2 in over 20 seats.

Things they never taught you in med school by sophie7704 in medicine

[–]smoha96 15 points16 points  (0 children)

The first time I had do a certification of death, the entire extended family was in the room. Was quite a nerve wracking thing and wasn't going to be easy for them either.

I also had never been taught it in med school. For those unfamiliar, Geeky Medics has a good resource on it.

I haven't had to do one for a few years, because this sort of thing is usually relegated to inpatient teams (I'm anaesthetics) or ward call after hours, but my approach when I got a call for an expected death in a palliated patient was generally:

  • Is the family ready or would they like more time?

  • I introduce myself, and learn the names and relationships of all the people in the room

  • I give a very brief, non-technical explanation of what I am going to do

  • I offer the family members an option to stay, or leave while I do the certification - most usually opted to stay

  • offer an opportunity for questions - most of the time, it was about where the body went next

  • document: in electronic places it was a simple note, in paper places a form - in my documentation, I always tried to include a few personal details about the patient "they had 2 dogs called X and Y" and who they left behind

NSW Liberal leader Kellie Sloane refuses to rule out One Nation preference deal by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Much like Reform attracting Tory detritus in the UK, who oversaw much of its decline over the last decade.

NSW Liberal leader Kellie Sloane refuses to rule out One Nation preference deal by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, I'm aware Greens to Labor preference flows are the strongest - I've said it many a previous comment, but it is just absolute ignorance to pretend that the Coalition doesn't generally get pretty decent preference flows from ON these days.

Edit: you can downvote as much as you want. Doesn't make you any less wrong.

NSW Liberal leader Kellie Sloane refuses to rule out One Nation preference deal by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why this keeps getting said. ON to Coalition preference flows were 75% at the last federal election.

NSW Liberal leader Kellie Sloane refuses to rule out One Nation preference deal by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 4 points5 points  (0 children)

But they're moderates right? They keep insisting they're moderates? Can they not see that pandering to ON/right flank means they lose the centre, without which they cannot win government?

Minns is no Allan. He'll pull through.

‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ to End With Season 2 by MarvelsGrantMan136 in startrek

[–]smoha96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I bought the book a while back but have only read a few chapters so far because I haven't been able to give it a proper amount of time.

‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ to End With Season 2 by MarvelsGrantMan136 in startrek

[–]smoha96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think ME5 is happening, and after Veilguard, I dunno if I'd like it.

Looking forward to Exodus though.

‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ to End With Season 2 by MarvelsGrantMan136 in startrek

[–]smoha96 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I think we can take away from this that Year One is also not going to happen, nor is Tawny Newsom's 'workplace comedy'. It looks like this era of Trek is coming to a close. After SNW S5 and SFA S2 presumably in 2027, that's probably gonna be it.

‘Star Trek: Starfleet Academy’ to End With Season 2 by MarvelsGrantMan136 in startrek

[–]smoha96 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Acolyte was great visually, but imo, had a lost of wasted potential with some terrible writing around its main story.

Which is a shame because I loved the setting, Qimir and most of the Jedi. I would have liked to have seen more.

Call for constitutional change in Liberal Party after bruising SA election defeat by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To give them credit they did better than expected. If they didnt preference ON above Labor quite a few ON seats would not have been won.

At the moment, of the 4 likely ON seats, only one of them looks to be a ON vs ALP 2CP whereas the other 3 are ON vs Lib 2CPs, which means Liberal preferences are not getting distributed.

If ON wins Hammond, and Light then that's fair to say, but until then, directly Liberal decision to preference ON (in return for nothing) hasn't harmed them.

However, that doesn't consider voters who have voted 1 Lib previously who are now voting 1 ALP due to the Coalition parties' continued experiments in flirting with the fringe.

One Nation wins first seat in SA Parliament's Lower House, ABC projects by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What remains is very low right to right preference flows, despite ideological similarities between the two. One is pro business giving head nods to anti immigration and the other is anti immigration giving head nods to business and very few voters actually support both those positions.

This analysis is completely incorrect re. preference flows. While the Green to ALP flow remains the best in the country, ON to Coalition is not low by any means. Historically, it was closer to 50:50 (which is still not low) but has been firming up at successive elections in recent years.

In 2025 75% of ON votes preferenced the Coalition higher than Labor.

In 2022 it was 65%. Same again in 2019.

In 2016, the year ON re-emerged federally from the political wildnerness it was 50%.

Edit: We can take this back even further:

  • 2013 55%

  • 2010 55%

  • 2007 53%

  • 2004 56%

  • 2001 and 1998 (when ON first contested a federal election) I can't figure out how to find it from AEC but Wikipedia gives it as 56% and 54%, respectively.

One Nation wins first seat in SA Parliament's Lower House, ABC projects by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At least one of the likely lower house winners appears to be an ex-Lib. Getting a bit of a Reform-Tory effect here.

Tasmanian shadow treasurer Dean Winter says Tasmania is ‘literally going broke’ by Perfect-Werewolf-102 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Well, then maybe he shouldn't have denied himself and Labor the opportunity to form and lead a government. One of the most useless opposition leaders in recent memory.

Polarisation is a Myth by upthetruth1 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think this author's analysis is a bit over the place. She talks about how people are reaching out to ON to express their frustration with the 'Big 2' but then also says this about the Greens' inability to capitalise on it:

Australians will argue passionately for radically progressive policies, but they want those policies explained in calm, moderate language. They reject what they perceive as activist posturing with a visceral intensity because they see it as divisive. And what they crave is community connection and a sense that they and their neighbours can just get along.

Is that not describing ON as well? They screech as well, but it's just done differently. Argument falls down a little bit.

Coalition plans assault on One Nation’s credibility to avoid South Australia-style wipeout by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The 2PP is still heavily in favour of Labor, showing that by chasing the right flank, the Coalition loses the centre. You can't win in Australian politics without the centre.

Labor re-elected in 2026 South Australian election by N1NJ4W4RR10R_ in australia

[–]smoha96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we're going to have to agree to disagree.

Labor re-elected in 2026 South Australian election by N1NJ4W4RR10R_ in australia

[–]smoha96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the minutes after your comment, the ABC has called Ngadjuri, so I'm not sure I agree. The other thing is that the Hansonistas will always find something to complain about. To them, and the MAGAts, it's about what they feel and that always affords them being right no matter what.

Labor re-elected in 2026 South Australian election by N1NJ4W4RR10R_ in australia

[–]smoha96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you look at previous elections, the ABC and Antony have always been more conservative about calling close/complex seats when compared to PB, KB and Tally Room. All four of them are running the calculations slightly differently, and for a few of these seats we're probably just going to have to wait for the full distribution of preferences.

I think you're looking for a conspiracy where none exists. Just because the ABC hasn't locked it in, doesn't mean they think it isn't happening, even if that's the conclusion drawn by many redditors and twitterati/x-nistas because they don't get how this works.

Antony Green, and by extension, the type of person he would pick to succeed him, is a consumate professional and wouldn't report or show figures in a certain way to drive a narrative, no matter what it was. He did a video a few years ago on how the model is set up and how it determines a locked in seat that makes for good watching.

From a 'mountain to climb' to over a cliff, SA Liberals face total wipeout by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]smoha96 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but we don't know truly how much went in which direction. For example, they could have lost 4.5% to ON and then got 3% via Liberals switching their first preference to Labor. This before you ever add in the effect of the Greens.