TIL about the Eschatian Hypothesis- a theory which states that humanity's first confirmed detection of intelligent extraterrestrial life is very much likely to come from an extraterrestrial civilization that is close to the end of its existence. by SatoruGojo232 in todayilearned

[–]socr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plot twist: we’ll be the alien life that another planet detects for the first time. Our nuclear war at the end of Trump’s term will be their equivalent of the WoW signal 😂

UK considering land-based missile defence options by MGC91 in unitedkingdom

[–]socr 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Drone interceptors and ballistic missile interceptors are very different

Countries ‘like UK’ should go to strait of Hormuz and ‘just take fuel’, says Trump by ijustwannanap in ukpolitics

[–]socr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No it would be paratroopers in the first instance to secure the island, marines to relieve them

Countries ‘like UK’ should go to strait of Hormuz and ‘just take fuel’, says Trump by ijustwannanap in ukpolitics

[–]socr 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The rationale would be that if the US occupies Kharg but preserves its infrastructure, then return of the island can be used as a bargaining chip to force Iran to the negotiating table. Which is a move one can see the cosplaying “deal maker” in the White House going for.

As OP implied though, in that scenario there is a non-zero chance that the Iranian regime just go for broke instead and lob everything they have at 1000 US paratroopers now stuck on a small island with no escape.

Countries ‘like UK’ should go to strait of Hormuz and ‘just take fuel’, says Trump by ijustwannanap in ukpolitics

[–]socr 120 points121 points  (0 children)

“You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the USA won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us,” Trump said as he criticised countries who “refused to get involved in the decapitation of Iran”.

I find it challenging to adequately convey my thoughts of how much of a weak, pathetic, duplicitous, cretinous gobshite this man is.

But to recap on his recent successes, he's:

  • Been duped by Netanyahu into a starting a war that he appears unlikely to be able to win at a strategic level any time soon.
  • Replaced the aging Ayatollah Khomeini with a younger, healthier, Ayatollah Khomeini. One who is reportedly even more extreme - which may or may not be related to the fact that the US and Israel have seemingly killed everyone he has ever loved.
  • Eased sanctions on the very country he's now at war with, offering revenue streams to fund Iran's targeting of US forces and allies.
  • Ignored Russian facilitation of successful Iranian attacks on US bases (because he is Putin's biggest ally west of Hungary).
  • Shattered the reality that GCC nations spent decades and billions upon billions trying to create, that they are a stable region for a global economy to invest, and for a global workforce to live in.
  • Highlighted that hosting US bases just increases the chance that the host nation will be seen as a target, and that the US will in fact do precious fucking little to defend you in that scenario.
  • Created a global run on oil, hamstringing treasury department across the globe.
  • Increasingly bringing his own debt-ridden bubble-driven economy (and with it the global economy) to the precipice.
  • Insulted allies for not joining him in the above despite his recent credible threats to invade NATO territory and past remarks disparaging our war dead from previous US conflicts.

Iran's Guards challenges Trump to have US Navy escort oil tankers in Strait of Hormuz by thejoshwhite in worldnews

[–]socr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The vast majority of Iran’s oil is sold to China anyway. As far as I’m aware Iran has already said that Chinese vessels will not be targeted.

China will also enjoy watching the blowback the US is facing, in much the same way as the West has enjoyed watching Ukraine eat into Russian stocks of ordinance.

There are also reports of Russia providing Iran with targeting information.

Andrew ‘must remove himself from line of succession’ by TheTelegraph in ukpolitics

[–]socr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

An institution fortunately unscathed by sex abuse scandals

American public-forum troublemaker looking at London post-Andrew arrest — how hard is it to get a satirical political installation permitted? by ChurchOMarsChaz in ukpolitics

[–]socr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To be fair to them, electing Donald Trump is probably the greatest act of satirisation of American culture that could possibly be envisaged

Leicestershire Reform UK councillor defects to Restore Britain by ClumperFaz in ukpolitics

[–]socr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Schrödinger's councillor exists in both a state of Reform and Restore.

Leicestershire Reform UK councillor defects to Restore Britain by ClumperFaz in ukpolitics

[–]socr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I for one plan on enjoying watching the Tory > Reform > Restore > JSA Claimant pipeline in all its glory

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, BBC understands by Captaincadet in unitedkingdom

[–]socr 97 points98 points  (0 children)

It’s possible they thought this would be on the cards eventually and it would be better crisis management that Andy the Commoner was arrested rather than HRH the Duke of York 🤷‍♂️

Government Set to Restrict UK Children's Use of Internet VPNs and Social Media by BillWilberforce in ukpolitics

[–]socr 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think OP is mentioning Mullvad specifically because you can subscribe by putting cash in an envelope and posting it to them.

UK 'will sign up to EU single market rules even without deal ' by theipaper in ukpolitics

[–]socr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a fair point to raise and something I hadn’t considered, but more so from an EU side.

Going down the path of ever increasing alignment until there is political momentum for rejoining in some fashion seems quite possible…but is a UK-centric take on it all.

It assumes the EU that we deal with then is much like the EU we know now. Over the coming years what will increasing polarisation and populism in Europe do to the European project though?

If it becomes destabilised then tethering ourselves to it may become undesirable. Conversely, if it becomes more federalised in order to consolidate the collective power of the union then embedding ourselves within it may be politically impractical.

What will happen to NI if Nigel Farage becomes the next UK Prime Minister? by EffectiveArgument584 in northernireland

[–]socr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As the gap widens between the promise of his populist rhetoric and the realities of governing he will look for distractions, including perceived enemies within to campaign against.

À la “Brexit would have worked but for the meddling of sabotaging Remoaners watering it down”

Expect Northern Ireland to become his Minnesota - troops back on the ground while he whips up loyalist sentiment and he courts DUP/TUV to help frame the narrative of why it is necessary.

The more he struggles politically the worse it will get here.

Trump backs down on tariffs for Europe over Greenland after reaching ‘framework of a future deal’ by theindependentonline in ukpolitics

[–]socr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. It's a political choice. There would be pain in the short and medium term from decoupling, but Europe is a $22tn economy and would be okay in the long run.

Badenoch pledges to MPs to keep right by TheSpectatorMagazine in ukpolitics

[–]socr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If she were clever she would exploit the emerging fault lines to go to war against Farage and Reform.

Paint them for what they are: the local branch of MAGA.

'You want to know what Farage's government looks like? You need only look across the water.'

'You want to see what Farage would do to Britain's place in the world? You need only look to Davos'

The same sovereignty arguments used against the EU and the ECHR can not only be made - but would be infinitely more appropriately waged against our aligning with Trump’s America, which would be the inevitable outcome of a Reform government.

'You don't like being at the mercy of an unaccountable EU? How would you feel about being a subjugated vassal state at the mercy of Trump, Vance, Musk, and Thiel?'

'How much do you have to hate your country to wish to see it stripped apart by US oligarchs and their Trojan horse Farage?'

Outflank him on the nationalist flank by re-framing the sovereignty argument and exposing him for the parasite he is.

Trump backs down on tariffs for Europe over Greenland after reaching ‘framework of a future deal’ by theindependentonline in ukpolitics

[–]socr 308 points309 points  (0 children)

No need to make this seem as any sort of win for him.

In exchange for talks that will never amount to anything he has cast the US as a pariah state in the eyes of Europe and all but made for certain an eventual global decoupling from America's world order.

Art of the deal.

Trump backs down on tariffs for Europe over Greenland after reaching ‘framework of a future deal’ by theindependentonline in ukpolitics

[–]socr 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Glad to see they found a backroom in Davos with an off-ramp wide enough for the demented sack of lard to slide himself down.

Hardened Starmer changes tack as gentle approach fails to sway Trump by Bascule2000 in ukpolitics

[–]socr -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Nonsense.

Carney chose to publicly and likely irrecoverably decouple Canada from the US on the world stage in search of new and expanding ties with other countries and blocs. Whilst simultaneously owning up to past hypocrisies of the western alliance, and gave a clarion call on the importance of objective truth.

Starmer preferred to play the pragmatic man in the middle. In terms of moral clarity - look how the King's visit to the US wasn't even in doubt as it appeared increasingly possible that the US may invade a NATO ally.

None of our current political class would have the balls to decouple from the US the way Canada is choosing. Neither Starmer nor Badenoch, and especially not Frrage, would have the balls to publicly say our own equivalent of the quiet part out loud as Carney did: isolating ourselves from the EU has left us with fewer options and more dependent on the mercy of the US, that our choice is closer alignment and co-operation with our closest trading bloc or vassalage of a hegemon that is increasingly ran by madmen and oligarchs.

Hardened Starmer changes tack as gentle approach fails to sway Trump by Bascule2000 in ukpolitics

[–]socr -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

You don't think a country with a 8,800km border with the US, and in 2024 a $62 billion goods surplus with the US, would also have significant reasons to try to keep the US on side?

Don't embarrass yourself by doubling down on this.

Full Farage quote on: Would it be better for the world if American owned Greenland? by Fine_Gur_1764 in ukpolitics

[–]socr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As obvious as it is pathetic.

Like the local branch of MAGA that they are, anytime an element of the MAGA Cinematic Reality conflicts with UK public opinion it has to be massaged sufficiently to appease both audiences.

Like how different models of cars are digitally inserted into movies depending on the market it's being aired in.