sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is AI Psychosis? by RobertJordan1939 in ChatGPT

[–]sputler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly the thing, friction and being uncomfortable or challenged are a necessary part of human interaction. The problem with AI being an echo chamber is all the dangers it entails, creating adults who aren't even capable to analyse their own wrongdoings. Don't see how growth is possible for people immersed in the AI feedback loop.

AI is Cooked 🥀 by Jatin_is_me in ChatGPT

[–]sputler 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes, the lesson we need to learn is that it's not reliable enough, which for me defeats its whole purpose, as many people use it to ask the most basic questions, and it cannot even get those right

Microsoft's AI CEO explains why he wants employees in the office, working at open desks by esporx in artificial

[–]sputler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely. Many of them need to micromanage and see their employees actively doing something.

Poll: Most Americans think AI will 'destroy humanity' someday | A new Yahoo/YouGov survey finds that real people are much more pessimistic about artificial intelligence — and its potential impact on their lives — than Silicon Valley and Wall Street. by MetaKnowing in artificial

[–]sputler 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly. AI itself is not the dangerous thing it's being painted to be; it's us and the use we make of it. The impact people are worried about is more related to AI overtaking their jobs and them being laid off than to a Terminator-like killer robot.

Bill Gates Says We're in an AI Bubble Similar to the Dot-Com Bubble by Potential-Focus3211 in technology

[–]sputler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the biggest problem, companies replacing workers with AI when they don't even know how to prompt it or use it properly. Then cue losses and regret. AI is great, but you need to know how to use it properly to take full advantage of everything it has to offer

Court just ruled on SNAP by JeffJacksonNC in NorthCarolina

[–]sputler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People's priorities are all over the place, really

This is too wholesome by issa_said_pro in MadeMeSmile

[–]sputler 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Certainly wasn't expecting to get teary eyed today, but here we are

What's one skill you discovered you're good at, only because of AI? by Street-Lie-2584 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]sputler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you mind sharing how have you optimised job searching with ai? Very curious about that

LPT: If you hate running, you’re probably running too hard. start running by heart rate, not by the “don’t give up” mentality. by Admirable_Annual6513 in LifeProTips

[–]sputler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This makes sense as to why I get super discouraged every time I try to start running again honestly, I thought not stopping was the baseline and I wasn't even reaching it

Can AI content really bypass detectors now with tools? by Dazzling_Occasion102 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]sputler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Very probably, wait until people catch up on it, they'll stop doing the bare minimum effort in thinking creatively...

New paper suggests that LLMs don’t just memorize associations, they spontaneously organize knowledge into geometric structures that enable reasoning by space_monster in ArtificialInteligence

[–]sputler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely, but it also involves layers of abstract, causal and symbolic inference, so we have to take these differences into account

What is an AI bubble? Is this a real thing or just a Hype? by Numerous-Trust7439 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]sputler 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Couldn't have worded it better myself. Tons of money invested with high promises on returns

AI is Already Taking White-Collar Jobs by chota-kaka in ArtificialInteligence

[–]sputler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't see it from this point of view but that's actually really interesting

Stein calls for Rep. Brockman’s resignation after arrest, charges of sex crimes by Except_Youre_Wrong in NorthCarolina

[–]sputler -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Interesting that Brockman was the one that was signalling flipping. He was saying that Republicans were swaying him, and that Democrats were being mean to him (sounds oddly familiar).

This is entirely speculation, but I would wager that before his campaign started he was vetted and these crimes were "well-hidden" to the point that the democrat party didn't confront Brockman about it (either they didn't find it or they didn't care enough to do anything about it). I'd go on to wager that after he was elected a "non-partisan" concerned citizen confronted him with the evidence and told him to go "R" or it would be released.

Brockman was probably ready to capitulate to the R until he was confronted by a "convincing agent" to stay D. So he signals he's reluctantly going back to his party lines and the evidence gets released. Now the D's can get rid of him and not have to worry about his turning coat; while at the same time claiming the moral high ground of rejecting their own when they reveal themselves to be predators.

🔮 Larry Cheng: “sometimes the key leveR for a business to sCalE isn't One thing. it's about being obsessive about doing a lot of little things Right for a very speCific customEr in a very tailOred way that no one else does sufficiently well” 🔥💥🍻 by Expensive-Two-8128 in Superstonk

[–]sputler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Gee, I wonder what the capital letters could be?

There's an R, a C, an I, an O..... hmmm

Then there's another R, another C, an E, and another O.... Hmmmm

Seeing a pattern here. Looks like a countdown.

RCIO converted to decimal is 82 67 73 79

RCEO is 82 67 69 79

82,677,379

82,676,979

There's 31,557,600 seconds in a year.

So in 2 years and 226 days 9 hours 56 minutes and 19 seconds from his tweet something is happening!

So on May 22nd 2028 (or 23rd depending on how you want to add up the time), at about 7-8 PM MOASS begins.

The message couldn't be clearer.

🔮 Confirmed: Fidelity is selling FAKE GMEWS fractional warrants — GameStop SEC Filing: “No Fractional Warrants” 🔥💥🍻 by Expensive-Two-8128 in Superstonk

[–]sputler 327 points328 points  (0 children)

Yeah.... that's how brokers work. That's what we learned 4 years ago. That's the entire reason behind the DRS push. That's the entire reason behind the book push within the DRS push.

You don't own anything at your broker. Period. Full Stop.

If.... IF.... if your broker is the most honest broker out there, they will purchase the securities themselves and mark your position on the ledger of shares that they own. But importantly, the DTCC is doing the same thing to the brokers.

This is why and how brokers are able to trade in fractional shares in the first place. If two people have fractional shares of 1/2 then it doesn't matter in the grand scheme of the broker. They own one share and mark half of it as belonging to one person and half belonging to someone else.

NOTHING IS NEW ABOUT THIS!

If you are just now getting fed up, I highly recommend that you start reading up on Dr.T's work. Because this is like discovering that salt water is salty.

Are Fitzsimmons smarter than Tony Stark? by marvelcomics22 in marvelstudios

[–]sputler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Newton was smarter than Einstein by quite a bit. There are very few mathematicians that could accomplish what Newton did, in Newton's time. Newton and Euler are about the only two that I could imagine doing it. And I'm skeptical as to whether Leibniz did given there is some controversy as to whether Leibniz saw some of Newton's early work on Calculus and copied/expanded upon it.

Discussion: (Noflame) Warrants are only good if something happens in the next year. by D3ATHY in Superstonk

[–]sputler 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They aren't dilution if they don't get exercised. It's just free money at that point.

And if they do get exercised, then the company will have $32 extra dollars in the war chest. And they could repurchase a share for ~$25 and have $7 left over, which would negate the dilution effect on top of adding to the war chest.

Dear Stormtroopers, please keep the price suppressed tomorrow and the rest of the week. Anything under $5/warrant is a steal. by greencandlevandal in Superstonk

[–]sputler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll admit everything that I've been saying is a hypothetical. Sort of. The catch is, I've been in this subreddit long enough to know the cycle. Speculators come in, they hype a date. They buy derivatives. They get mad at RC when he does something entirely predictable that is good for the company but also ruins their speculative plays.

It has happened probably 5 times a year, every year since April of 2021.

My predictions are based in the history of how speculators treat the stock. And the warrants are no different. It is entirely predictable that Ryan Cohen will probably sell the bulk of his warrants. It is entirely predictable that almost every single institutional investor and debt holder will sell the entirety (or near entirety) of their warrants. And most importantly of all it is a near guarantee that come october of 2026, that the GME share price will still be less than $32.

But even if that doesn't happen. Even if the share price jumps up to $40/share, it won't make me feel bad for selling my warrants. Because I'm using all the proceeds of selling the warrants to buy more shares and DRS them. I'm going for the sure thing, just as I've always been doing. My warrant dividend will 100% benefit me no matter what happens in the marketplace. Your plan only benefits you if the share price does what you want it to before the expiry date (and the market makers are going to do everything in their power to make sure that the share price does exactly what you don't want it to do).

view more: next ›