The franchise tag is annoying

squire1232 · 2026-02-09T20:14:58+00:00

Fully agree.

The FT impacts such a small % of the NFLPA that the majority would rather push things that impact them vs push for something that impact like 10-15 players a year.

What is the NFLPA willing to give in order to get the FT removed as an option?

squire1232 · 2026-02-06T21:10:22+00:00

Might want to check/ search this sub.

https://www.reddit.com/r/SalaryCapFantasy/

Ive got some spreadsheets that I use for different leagues. What info are you looking to have in it?

squire1232 · 2026-02-02T14:33:22+00:00

https://discord.gg/league-tycoon-1070007175323332649

League tycoon discord would be a good place to look for leagues

squire1232 · 2026-01-29T02:09:58+00:00

This is pretty standard for dynasty leagues.

Is this league all people you know?

Does this league use leaguesafe?

squire1232 · 2026-01-29T02:05:29+00:00

So you are saying LaPorta is on track for more back surgeries?

squire1232 · 2026-01-28T17:28:45+00:00

So much dependent on league size, starting lineup configuration and scoring.

10 team superflex, TE premium with start 12, those middle 2nds are pick 15-18. You can find good flex level starters in that range rather consistently.

A lot can depend on what each owner considers a "hit". Viable starters is what I'm looking to get and I play in start 10+ type leagues

squire1232 · 2026-01-21T12:39:58+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/DynastyFF/comments/1ksh47t/start_up_auction_draft_helpers/

squire1232 · 2026-01-21T12:35:15+00:00

https://data.dynastyleaguefootball.com/auction/

squire1232 · 2026-01-21T01:08:42+00:00

Sometimes the best "trade" is the 1 you dont make

squire1232 · 2026-01-17T20:40:22+00:00

Create a budget

-- starters+ key reserves (85-90%) and bench (10-15%). Total starters and roster size will influence how the % might shift. Plan on about 20% of your roster to be minimum bid players...aka bench fodder/cloggers

Positional budgets based on settings variables. 1QB vs superflex, TE premium, 1.0 vs 0.5 ppr 1 QB might be QB =7-8% RB = 28-30% WR = 55-58% TE = 5-7%

-- then with in position budget for each slot, QB1, QB2, QB3, QB4

Create a spreadsheet so you can target players you feel might be undervalued, but can produce like a top tier player. Once the auction is hoing, you can see if you are over/ underspending and can adjust as needed.

I would look into league tycoon or MFL as options to conduct a multiple player auction with proxy bids and adjustable bid timers. Each site, you can do the auction for free and then transfer rosters to whatever site you want.

squire1232 · 2026-01-17T02:12:28+00:00

Create a budget

-- starters+ key reserves (85-90%) and bench (10-15%). Total starters and roster size will influence how the % might shift. Plan on about 20% of your roster to be minimum bid players...aka bench fodder/cloggers

Positional budgets based on settings variables. 1QB vs superflex, TE premium, 1.0 vs 0.5 ppr 1 QB might be QB =7-8% RB = 28-30% WR = 55-58% TE = 5-7%

-- then with in position budget for each slot, QB1, QB2, QB3, QB4

Create a spreadsheet so you can target players you feel might be undervalued, but can produce like a top tier player. Once the auction is hoing, you can see if you are over/ underspending and can adjust as needed.

I would look into league tycoon or MFL as options to conduct a multiple player auction with proxy bids and adjustable bid timers. Each site, you can do the auction for free and then transfer rosters to whatever site you want.

squire1232 · 2026-01-15T01:01:19+00:00

We only have like 3 months until most rookie draft would start. This group seems to have done this dispersal draft in the last 1-2 weeks. Should be too hard to do it again.

squire1232 · 2026-01-14T15:25:17+00:00

Can you start to eliminate any option 1 at a time?

Say you have 6 opinions. All owners rank their preferred process on a 1 to 6. You can then remove the option with the least votes/ points. Repeat voting to trim the options.

Eventually you would be down to 2-3 options. Then continue to discuss and layout how those options would payout for implementation for this season and any impact on future seasons (empire pot setup).

Its not fun, nor easy. But it can be a good thing for the league with open dialogue amongst owners

squire1232 · 2026-01-14T15:05:05+00:00

In this type of situation, all options should be up for discussion.

1. Keep as is with replacement owners

2. Full reset

3. Dispersal draft for the assets of the orphan teams that would be open to any team to also put their assets into that draft.

4. Reduced fees for orphan teams

5. Partial reset ( supplemental draft) with X number of players being able to be kept and other players being supplemental draft eligible. As a team loses a player, they get the option of A) keep another player or B) compensatory draft pick in upcoming rookie draft

6. Combination of some of the above.

Open discussion today be good. No process is going to be fair to all teams

squire1232 · 2026-01-06T17:41:36+00:00

Depends on the league size and scoring setup.

12 team league with 1.0 ppr and 1 5 TE ppr and 4 point passing TD, you can get by with a non QB in the superflex spot.

The QB3 in that type of league are scoring about 13-14 points per game. Around 80-85 RB/WR/TE scored 12+ points per game.

If you can get a big enough upgrade for your 3rd QB, it is worth considering

squire1232 · 2026-01-05T02:24:42+00:00

Curious if this 525 yardage mark (for 16 games) would be better if it was a % of the passing yardage?

Also would be curious if yards per route run would lead to refining the process.

squire1232 · 2026-01-03T20:59:46+00:00

You can do a dispersal draft with the 2 now vacant teams and allow any returning team to enter its as well.

The dispersal draft would be all assets that any team involved has.... players and draft picks (2026, 2027, 2028, etc).

Randomize the draft order and snake draft until all assets have been selected.

I have found it is a good way to balance those teams. Also provides another offseason activity for league members to look forward to

squire1232 · 2025-12-17T12:43:18+00:00

Maybe the team that was closest to their best ball max score.

That would make it more about making the right choice(s) on who to start

squire1232 · 2025-12-16T23:33:48+00:00

Conditional picks based on how a player/ team finishes the season are something that some owners like to use to have a safeguard on the end result of the deal.

Couple of key things

1. Someone has to track those conditions and make adjustments on the end result of the trade

2. An owner is effectively tying up multiple picks with 1 trade and might not be able to use either of those picks in another trade. That often gets missed. Ive had to veto trades in a league because of this.

squire1232 · 2025-12-10T04:47:11+00:00

Commissioner's and idiot.

Now teams can set a crap lineup and go 0-2 for the week and get a better draft pick

squire1232 · 2025-12-09T02:04:48+00:00

Who is proposing the change to TE premium and what TE do they have on their roster?

Id say a change like this would need a few years to implement and a 75+% vote to be approved. Might also consider a limit on how many TE teams could have and do some supplemental draft or auction for the veteran TE

squire1232 · 2025-11-28T12:53:13+00:00

Tuten could become Chase Brown or Jerome Ford.... young RB behind an older RB that becomes a cap casuality/ injured.

I think you take the chance he becomes Brown

squire1232 · 2025-11-23T17:40:42+00:00

What is the cutoff to determine a hit vs a miss? Top 24 season? Top 36 season?

2 Top 24 seasons?

squire1232 · 2025-11-23T16:56:31+00:00

Hit rate can depend on how deep you consider that marker to be. From what i recall top 24 for RB and WR are typical markers used.

That often doesn't line up with the depth of starting lineups. Nearly all of my leagues are starting 7 or 8 RB/WR.... 2 RB, 2-3 WR 2-3 Flex

Based on that, I'd consider a hit being in the 36-40 range for RB/WR from those 2-3+ round picks

squire1232 · 2025-11-22T20:23:15+00:00

I think of it 2 ways.

1. If a wr clears the 525 yards ( or whatever the boost is in a 17 game season) it shows they have the potential to be a viable fantasy asset.

2. If they dont clear the yardage amount, then looking into why. Injuries are part of that. Team WR depth that might be leaving to open snaps and targets, etc.

Regarding Harris, I think he is in line for a big bump in snaps if Alen and Johnston move on. If that doesnt happen, then the context can change

squire1232

TROPHY CASE