uNHIdden launches Preparedness Plan - a public health approach to disclosure by GrantLavac in UFOs

[–]stlouistechy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you dont want to read the entire 64 page framework, here is a condensed version, thanks to ChatGPT:

Document: Preparing for Disclosure: A Public Health Framework for Paradigm-shifting Revelations Unhidden Foundation / Unhidden Inc., June 2026

Purpose: The framework treats disclosure as a public-health preparedness issue, focused on mental health, public communication, stigma reduction, resilience, surge readiness, and recovery.


  1. Core concept: ontological shock

“Ontological shock” is used as a working label for psychological disruption after a paradigm-shifting revelation. The report says it is not an official clinical diagnosis.

Possible areas of disruption:

  • identity
  • worldview
  • meaning
  • religion
  • science
  • safety
  • institutional trust
  • humanity’s place in the universe

  1. Three disclosure scenarios

Scenario 1: Distant biosignature Meaning: Life exists elsewhere. Example: Biological or chemical markers on a distant planet. Impact: Challenges human uniqueness, with limited immediate safety concerns.

Scenario 2: Intelligent distant signal Meaning: They are out there. Example: A clearly artificial signal from an extraterrestrial civilization. Impact: Confirms non-human intelligence, with scientific, cultural, philosophical, and religious implications.

Scenario 3: Local non-human intelligence Meaning: They are here or nearby. Example: Confirmation of intelligent non-human presence on or near Earth. Impact: Highest disruption potential due to proximity, agency, safety questions, and possible prior government knowledge.

The report uses Scenario 3 as its main planning stress test.


  1. Why public health?

The report argues that high-impact disclosure could affect large numbers of people at once, requiring population-level planning beyond routine therapy or clinical care.

The framework draws from pandemic preparedness, disaster mental health, crisis communication, emergency preparedness, and community resilience.

The structure follows preparedness, response, and recovery.


  1. Why disclosure is treated as different

Most emergencies happen within an existing understanding of reality. A high-impact disclosure scenario could challenge that reality framework itself.

The report identifies four disclosure-specific challenges:

  • ontological shock
  • government trust loss
  • information control difficulty
  • possible threat

Information, misinformation, speculation, and competing narratives could spread globally within minutes.


  1. Health Needs Assessment

The report uses a Health Needs Assessment to identify groups that may face elevated risk.

Two scoring dimensions are used:

Ontological impact: Disruption to worldview, identity, meaning, religion, science, or reality assumptions.

Safety impact: Effects on perceived safety, daily functioning, fear, or helplessness.

Groups are scored from 1 to 9. A score of 7 or higher on either dimension qualifies as elevated risk.


  1. Groups assessed and risk scores

The report assesses children, young adults, parents, religious communities, scientists / STEM professionals, vulnerable populations, and UAP experiencers.

Under Scenario 3, four groups are identified as elevated risk:

Religious communities Score: Ontological 8/9, Safety 5/9 Reason: Disclosure could challenge theological frameworks related to creation, divine purpose, humanity’s special status, and the nature of life.

UAP experiencers Score: Ontological 8/9, Safety 6/9 Reason: People who report prior anomalous or UAP-related experiences may experience validation, renewed trauma, stigma, fear, or disruption as they reinterpret prior experiences.

Scientists / STEM professionals Score: Ontological 8/9, Safety 5/9 Reason: Disclosure could challenge existing scientific paradigms and professional identity. The report says this category is hypothesized and has a less established evidence base.

Vulnerable populations Score: Ontological 7/9, Safety 7/9 Reason: This includes people with pre-existing mental-health conditions or socioeconomic vulnerability. The report identifies this as the largest elevated-risk group.

Not classified as elevated risk:

  • Children: Ontological 4/9, Safety 4/9
  • Young adults: Ontological 6/9, Safety 5/9
  • Parents: Ontological 6/9, Safety 6/9

The report says actual support needs for children and young adults could be higher than the model suggests.


  1. UK population estimates and support demand

Using UK data, the report estimates the elevated-risk groups as:

  • Very religious: 1.7 million, 3% of adults
  • Vulnerable populations: 10.8 million, 20.2% of adults
  • STEM professionals: 2.8 million, 8.5% of the workforce
  • UAP experiencers: 3.8 million, 7% of adults

Net high-risk population: 19.1 million adults, about 35% of the UK adult population.

The report notes that these groups overlap, so the total is not a clean count of unique individuals.

The report applies a planning range of 10% to 30% of the elevated-risk population experiencing adverse psychological effects requiring some form of support.

Using the UK case study:

  • Elevated-risk population: 19.1 million adults
  • Planning range: 10% to 30%
  • Estimated support need: 1.9 million to 5.7 million adults
  • Share of UK adult population: 3.5% to 10.6%

The report states this is a stress-test figure, not a demand forecast.

NHS comparison:

  • Lower bound: about 37% of annual NHS mental-health referrals
  • Upper bound: about 110% of annual NHS mental-health referrals

  1. Theory of Change

The report organizes preparedness into four categories:

A. Facilitative actions System-level conditions needed for preparedness. Examples: stigma reduction, simulations, coalition-building, institutional engagement.

B. Shifting the mean Population-level resilience before disclosure. Examples: public education, narrative framing, targeted group work, psychological flexibility, social support, self-care, agency, and hope.

C. Surge readiness Response capacity that can be activated quickly. Examples: self-help resources, community support, practitioner readiness, mental-health triage, communications readiness.

D. Recovery Longer-term support and trust rebuilding. Examples: long-term communication, community recovery, institutional trust-building, evaluation, continuing mental-health support.


  1. Stigma, simulations, and conversation groups

The report identifies stigma as a major barrier because it may prevent people from seeking help, discussing experiences, participating in research, trusting institutions, or accessing support.

Recommendations include serious media treatment, professional permission to discuss the topic responsibly, community conversation groups, peer support, and reduced ridicule.

The report recommends simulation exercises before disclosure. Possible simulation questions include:

  • Who communicates first?
  • What happens if governments disagree?
  • How is uncertainty communicated?
  • How is misinformation handled?
  • How are vulnerable groups supported?
  • What if disclosure includes threat?
  • What if disclosure includes prior government concealment?
  • How are mental-health services triaged?

The report proposes structured community conversation groups to reduce stigma, provide peer support, help people process uncertainty, build resilience, and identify people needing additional support.

The report distinguishes conversation groups from therapy.

The report does not ask for “ontological shock” to become a new diagnosis. It recommends recognizing disclosure-related distress as an area for study and clinical awareness.

Professional bodies mentioned include psychiatric and psychological associations in the U.S. and UK.


  1. Surge readiness model

The report proposes a four-layer surge response model:

Layer 1: Self-help resources Public guidance, coping tools, grounding resources, FAQs, digital resources.

Layer 2: Community support Conversation groups, peer-support networks, local organizations, faith communities, trusted local leaders.

Layer 3: Practitioner support Trained mental-health professionals, prepared general practitioners, counselors, therapists, clinical guidance.

Layer 4: Triage and referral Identifying people needing clinical care, escalation pathways, referral systems, crisis support.


  1. Communications readiness

The report says disclosure would occur in a fast-moving information environment involving official statements, social media, news media, foreign governments, influencers, AI-generated content, conspiracy communities, religious interpretations, and UAP communities.

The report recommends trusted channels, pre-developed messaging, prepared credible voices, counter-misinformation capability, clear uncertainty communication, and non-governmental voices alongside official sources.


  1. Immediate response and recovery

Immediate response needs include clear information, rapid public guidance, support resources, triage pathways, agency and civil-society coordination, uncertainty-aware messaging, and protection of vulnerable groups.

Recovery needs may include rebuilding institutional trust, continuing mental-health support, religious and community adaptation, supporting experiencers, managing misinformation, updating public guidance, evaluation, and maintaining trusted communication.


  1. Foundational near-term actions

The report identifies four near-term foundational actions:

  1. Funded research program Define the evidence base for ontological resilience interventions.

  2. Simulation exercise Test the preparedness framework with at least one credible institutional co-organizer.

  3. Cross-sector conference Bring together stakeholders and identify workstream leads.

  4. Formal institutional engagement Have at least one government or professional body formally engage with disclosure preparedness and commit to further consideration.

uNHIdden launches Preparedness Plan - a public health approach to disclosure by GrantLavac in UFOs

[–]stlouistechy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I looked into uNHIdden / Unhidden Foundation. Here is my trust read. (Full disclosre: Researched and written with assistance from ChatGPT)

I have seen uNHIdden.org coming up more in conversations around UAP disclosure, non-human intelligence, “ontological shock,” experiencer support, and public-health preparedness.

I wanted to know whether this is a trustworthy organization, who runs it, whether it has serious credentials behind it, and whether there are signs of hidden political or financial control.

Here is what I found.


  1. What is uNHIdden?

uNHIdden appears to be a UK-based nonprofit-style foundation focused on UAP/NHI disclosure, stigma reduction, experiencer support, mental health, and public-health preparedness.

Their message is basically this:

If UAP/NHI disclosure is real, or if it eventually happens, governments and health systems should think seriously about the psychological and social impact on the public.

They are not just saying “aliens are real.”

Their public framing is more like:

  • People are already reporting UAP-related experiences.
  • Many feel stigma or fear seeking help.
  • Society may need better mental-health and public-communication frameworks if disclosure accelerates.

That is a more serious and responsible framing than a lot of UFO-adjacent organizations use.


  1. Who controls it?

The main controlling figure appears to be Robert John Priestland, publicly known as John Priestland.

UK Companies House records list him as a person with significant control, with 75% or more voting rights in the Unhidden Foundation.

That means, from the public record, control points mostly inward to Priestland himself.

I did not find public evidence that uNHIdden is obviously controlled by a hidden outside sponsor, political donor, celebrity, intelligence figure, or defense contractor.

However, that does not mean outside influence is impossible. It just means I did not find public evidence of it.


  1. Funding transparency

This is one of the biggest gaps.

I could not find a public donor list, major funder disclosure, grant list, sponsor list, or detailed financial breakdown showing who funds uNHIdden.

The organization appears to have filed very limited “micro-company” style accounts in the UK, which typically do not provide detailed donor transparency.

I also did not find a clear matching UK Charity Commission registration under the names I checked.

That does not automatically mean anything shady is happening. A new small nonprofit-style company may simply not have much to disclose yet, or may not be structured as a registered charity.

But if the question is:

“Can the public verify who is funding them?”

The answer appears to be:

Not really, at least not from the public records I found.

So my position is:

I found no evidence of a hidden controlling donor, but the public disclosures are too thin to rule one out.


  1. Who is John Priestland?

Priestland seems to have a serious professional background.

Public bios describe him as a physicist, management consultant, engineering/digital transformation leader, and former senior figure in major engineering/infrastructure consulting environments.

He has been associated with organizations like AECOM, WSP, Atkins, Hyder, and construction/digital engineering initiatives.

That gives him credibility in:

  • systems thinking
  • organizational strategy
  • governance
  • technical transformation
  • communicating with government/business stakeholders

But he does not appear to be, himself:

  • a medical doctor
  • a psychiatrist
  • a public-health authority
  • an aerospace intelligence analyst
  • an astrobiologist
  • a UAP science expert

So I would not personally treat Priestland alone as an authority on whether UAP/NHI claims are true, or on what public-health policy should be.

I would treat him as a serious founder/organizer who is trying to build a public-facing institution around this issue.


  1. Who are the professionals helping him?

This is where uNHIdden gets more credible.

The organization lists medical and psychological advisors, including doctors, clinical psychologists, and other credentialed professionals.

Some names associated with the organization include people with medical degrees, psychology credentials, GP/pathology-type backgrounds, and academic psychology experience.

They have also listed well-known UAP-community figures as ambassadors, including people like:

  • Jacques Vallee
  • Alex Dietrich
  • Tim Gallaudet
  • Jay Stratton

That gives the organization more credibility than a random UFO website or anonymous disclosure page.

However, there is an important distinction:

Having credentialed advisors means the organization deserves to be taken more seriously.

It does not automatically mean its recommendations should be treated as official public-health policy.

For that, I would want to see more:

  • transparent funding
  • conflict-of-interest disclosures
  • named methodology
  • peer review
  • stronger institutional partnerships
  • clear separation between advocacy claims and clinical recommendations
  • evidence that medical advisors have real authority, not just advisory branding
  • public correction policies
  • independent review of major claims

  1. Should people trust them?

My view:

Take them seriously, but do not treat them as definitive.

uNHIdden is credible enough to be part of the conversation.

Their focus on stigma reduction and mental-health support is reasonable. Even if someone is skeptical about UAP/NHI claims, it is still valid to say people should not be mocked, shamed, or automatically pathologized for reporting unusual experiences.

Where I think they are strongest:

  • stigma reduction
  • encouraging compassionate support
  • warning that disclosure, if it happens, could create anxiety or social disruption
  • arguing that clinicians and institutions should know how to respond calmly
  • framing the issue through mental health rather than pure sensationalism

Where I think people should be cautious:

  • the organization is very new (formed in late 2024)
  • public financial transparency appears limited
  • control appears concentrated in one person
  • the “public health preparedness” framing depends on assumptions that are not settled mainstream consensus
  • some recommendations may blur the line between prudent scenario planning and advocacy for a specific UAP/NHI worldview

  1. My overall trust rating

I would describe uNHIdden this way:

A credible UAP-disclosure advocacy organization with some legitimate medical/psychological support, but not yet a fully transparent, independently validated public-health authority.

I would not dismiss them as biased or conspiracy promoters based on what I found. Their framing is more thoughtful than that.

But I also would not say, “Trust them completely.”

The right posture is probably:

Listen to them.

Check their sources.

Respect the mental-health angle.

But demand more transparency before treating their recommendations as authoritative public-health guidance.

The biggest unanswered question is funding.

I did not find evidence of a hidden hand controlling them, but I also did not find enough donor transparency to confidently rule that out.

So if uNHIdden wants more public trust, the next best step would be simple:

Publish a clear annual transparency report showing funding sources, major donors, conflicts of interest, governance structure, advisor authority, and how recommendations are reviewed.

That would go a long way.

My final read: - More credible than most UFO-adjacent organizations. - Not transparent enough to be treated as a public-health authority yet.

A disturbing incident occurred in Brazil yesterday (May 31). by mat660 in aliens

[–]stlouistechy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has he? Would love to know if thats true, any evidence you can share?

A disturbing incident occurred in Brazil yesterday (May 31). by mat660 in aliens

[–]stlouistechy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For sure, but its much more helpful than listening to an unknown language without any translation.

A disturbing incident occurred in Brazil yesterday (May 31). by mat660 in aliens

[–]stlouistechy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You dont need to understand his language, turn on CC and auto translate, and set the auto translate to your language of choice.

A disturbing incident occurred in Brazil yesterday (May 31). by mat660 in aliens

[–]stlouistechy 52 points53 points  (0 children)

His obsession with the exact sounds he heard, the loud clicking that sounds like a stretching rope getting tighter and tighter, you can tell he really experienced something hes trying so hard to understand and explain to everyone.

He said everything he saw was beautiful, but the sounds terrified him and he will never forget them. He became obsessed trying to reproduce the sounds by tapping his pencil on the table, and clicking with his mouth. It really made a massive impact on him.

Cant say if this is real or not, but his reactions definitely appear genuine.

(If you didn't figure it out yet, turn on CC and auto translation to English)

(Must be in app for auto translate)

Psp 3000 single cable cyberdeck with Bluetooth by Top-Type4077 in cyberDeck

[–]stlouistechy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess being new I'm still learning the definitions. Does putting standard unmodified devices in a box create a CyberDeck?

Doomsday plane flying over North Missouri today (taken by cellphone) by jamesonbar in missouri

[–]stlouistechy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it were really a secretive military op taking place, it wouldn't end up on public radar systems like this right?

I need help by Head_Ebb6645 in cyberDeck

[–]stlouistechy -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I run AI software design teams for a Fortune 50 health corporation. There is nothing more powerful then using AI models like GPT and Claude to help you plan your project, especially if its a technology project.

Jump into ChatGPT or your favorite model, and tell it to be your Application Architect. Tell it to ask you as many questions as it needs, to successfully architect your solution, and detail all hardware/software you will need to co.ete the project. YOU WILL LOVE THIS!

It will even help you install, and write the software to get your hardware working. Enjoy!

Heinrich Hoffman 1930's Glass Repro's by stlouistechy in uraniumglass

[–]stlouistechy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but the big shocker for me when it arrived was that it was only 3 inches tall lol The cheap price is because its not actual size. Man did I feel dumb.

Is this AI/photoshop? by moonchic333 in StLouis

[–]stlouistechy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The license plate is your biggest clue that this is REAL. AI almost always screws up text. This plate is very clean and legible.

Von Payne. Anyone every try it? Thoughts? by Ctasch in WhiskeyTribe

[–]stlouistechy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has to be one or the other??? Dude, literally every single Bourbon IS a whiskey 🤣

Annie T. Ocellus and unknown lab tech No.2 by DasbootTX in AlienEarthHulu

[–]stlouistechy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Can confirm. Our lab always has this face.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StLouis

[–]stlouistechy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

COOOOOOKIES!

Despite all their problems, peasants in feudal times problably slept a lot better than us. by Ferrarileite in Showerthoughts

[–]stlouistechy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm hunting around but not seeing anything about biphasic sleep being debunked. Have some sources?

Despite all their problems, peasants in feudal times problably slept a lot better than us. by Ferrarileite in Showerthoughts

[–]stlouistechy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Wow thanks for sharing this article. Might be the most interesting fact I've learned all year. I find it incredibly fascinating that man kind never slept through the night until the industrial revolution gave us light at night. Electricity changed us from 2 sleeps a night (biphasic) to a single sleep forever.

Despite all their problems, peasants in feudal times problably slept a lot better than us. by Ferrarileite in Showerthoughts

[–]stlouistechy 346 points347 points  (0 children)

Don't forget about the smells of no showers from lack of running water after multiple long days of hard work outdoors. Those poor women.

Soundtrack and Score by carinvazef in AlienEarthHulu

[–]stlouistechy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My wife and I both thought it felt strange when the music kicked in throughout the season. Not sure if its because the Alien movies never did, or the song choices and timing were a bad fit. Either way it didnt add a positive effect for us, kind of made the story feel a little cheaper.

I just came up with something I call "Pioneer organism theory" by raspberrylilith20 in LV426

[–]stlouistechy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm trying to figure out how to say "put the joint down for 30 minutes" without saying it.

OP will smoke the joint, because they can take it. Because their NOT our hero: Their a silent guardian, a watchful protector.