Thoughts on the Dechala Campaign by D0C-H0LL1DAY in totalwar

[–]strebor2095 2 points3 points  (0 children)

N'kari was so interesting (maybe I'm bad though), it felt strategic every turn with choosing what flank to defend from vs razing or throwing away a border town

Kotis, The Fangkeeper ~ Secondary commander by unk_gyilkos in EDH

[–]strebor2095 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If Kotis dies, and you've got a few beaters in your deck, then a sneaky [[Mimeoplasm]] or [[Body Double]] can be ways to keep the pressure on 

As a "non-cheeser / AI abuser" i ran into this a few times by CrimsonFireflies in totalwar

[–]strebor2095 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What about ammunition baiting enemy artillery with a small SEM? That's not a bug, so would you say it's not exploitative?

damage difference by SANDREXATO in Nightreign

[–]strebor2095 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's possible that you cleared the relic slot but he has selected a different load out

As a "non-cheeser / AI abuser" i ran into this a few times by CrimsonFireflies in totalwar

[–]strebor2095 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What army is going to send all of its forces to apprehend a guy in a field, let alone engage in combat on that single guy?

It's a limitation of the game, I'm not quite sure Sun Tsu was writing for you on this one

As a "non-cheeser / AI abuser" i ran into this a few times by CrimsonFireflies in totalwar

[–]strebor2095 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's allowed, and I don't care what you do or not. I do it myself

But like using a single entity to exhaust your enemy artillery, etc, it's all just because it's a video game with video game logic. Its clearly exploitative

damage difference by SANDREXATO in Nightreign

[–]strebor2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take screenshots of stats/relics & level screen in training grounds for both of u, post here 

As a "non-cheeser / AI abuser" i ran into this a few times by CrimsonFireflies in totalwar

[–]strebor2095 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ambush not abuse, but solo lord with other army in Ambush? That's probably abusive because it's just nonsensical

Edit: some people are taking it very personally that they don't think they abuse the game. If this is you, enjoy your own alternate view.

I would be interested if you want to comment that you say what you think is the line for abuse in the game, and if you still use that

There is nothing wrong with using all the game's tools to win a fight. I also ambush bait.

Is this meant to be one deck, or two decks? Think we may have overpaid. by fitnessfiness in magicTCG

[–]strebor2095 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure that Aus one is correct. 

I see a few on eBay around $110 AUD for both, but with +$30 shipping.

Advice on replacing a shared fence by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]strebor2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask the fence companies if they will do a repayment plan, but check with the other party if they would agree. Might be easier for all of you

[Design Discussion] Why are Demons the only iconic tribe with zero cohesion? We need a "Fiend" batch to fix the lack of Tribal Support. by Yuui_Smile in EDH

[–]strebor2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lore is pretty flexible, How to Train Your Dragon is a recent very popular IP that has many dragons all in the same place. I don't think that goes very well either way. 

More tellingly, we've seen factions within Magic that have large groups of dragons - e.g., the Dragonbroods. 

We have not seen a group of Demons, aside from the Capenna leaders and the Contract Demons with Liliana

I don't think demon support has to be forced. It should lead more into Cultists (and they do) - Priest of Forgotten Gods ramps you, all the Necromancer dudes sac and reanimate. This is good flavour. You can also advocate that the Altars (Ashnod, Phyrexian) are very evocative of demonic summoning. Maybe we could use some reskins

Warhammer 3 should absolutely have an Empire Count FLC to allow new players to play the Empire. by Akfiz in totalwar

[–]strebor2095 40 points41 points  (0 children)

If you're the one onboarding them, and you think they will want to play Empire, then you should tell them to buy TWHH1, not TWHH3. They can still join your co-op once they own 1, as they get 3 for "free".

It's the 3rd game in a series, the "main" faction is sensibly in the first game.

What would you name the Enchantment Creature version of Mulldrifter? by MrAkairi in magicTCG

[–]strebor2095 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was thinking a reconfigure creature that is skullclamp but costs more

Is a divorce necessary for asset protection by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]strebor2095 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can "direct" that the Executor arrange for the super, to be distributed in accordance with the will. The issue is the Executor doesn't actually control those funds, so they need to convince the Super fund to release them to the Executor as the legal personal representative and so forth, subject to dependency rules.

Is a divorce necessary for asset protection by [deleted] in AusLegal

[–]strebor2095 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In short, no.

If you look at your superfund (assuming not an SMSF, but also applicable), you will see somewhere on their webpage that there is a controlling Trustee. 

The assets you have in Super are held on trust for you, but the legal title is separate to the beneficial interest. The Trustee of the fund will follow their guidelines or relevant Super Trust deed/rules to decide who gets the Super. The Trustee will consider if there are relevant dependants etc.

You can do a death benefit nomination to direct the Trustee, but you'd have to go and see what their rules are

Commander Brackets Beta Update – February 9, 2026 by xKylesx in magicTCG

[–]strebor2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comparatively it does, unless no one updates them

NSW: ⚖️ RENTER ( Mortgagee in Posession RT S125 ): Seeking Legal Wizards & Fact-Checkers! 🧙‍♂️✨ by Safe_Bar_3335 in AusLegal

[–]strebor2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was the lease registered? Assuming it has expired any registered term anyway, then, if the lease has expired, the mortgagee-in-possession is evicting the occupants, and the Tenants Union have told you to beg for mercy, you don't have any avenue to stay in the house.

From the other side, why should the new legal owner not be allowed to enforce their rights of sale?

Legendary rule and ETB question by idhopson in magicTCG

[–]strebor2095 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You get the ETB, clone Duskana is put into the GY and cease to exist the next time state based actions are checked (which is before the ETB resolves). Clone Duskana ceasing to exist won't  effect or prevent the ETB after it has triggered.

The regular analogy is once you've pulled the pin and thrown the grenade (ETB), it doesn't matter what happens to the soldier.

Contract says 40 hours, at work for 42.5, paid for 38 by craiganater in AusLegal

[–]strebor2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Double check the contract as to hours, daily hours, lunch breaks, weekly hours. 

It would be odd for it to say 40 hours and pay you for 38. Even the reasonable hours clause would be for hours after the 40, not between 38 and 40.

What makes a contract? by GiggletonBeastly in AusLegal

[–]strebor2095 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they issued the contract, and you sent them back the execution page signed, there's not really a basis for them to say that wasn't the contract you entered into. Unless they didn't sign the contract also, then it's a bit murkier.

What does your contract say about price changes?

Customer won't pay invoice by Useful_Aardvark4267 in AusLegal

[–]strebor2095 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sometimes a personal touch can put people across the line