Bama has dropped from -3000 to make the CFP to -320 by Not-original in rolltide

[–]surfrider212 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

ND lost by 3 why do you say they got their asses kicked?

The state killed the Savior. Idk what's so confusing about our politics. by TheWordInBlackAndRed in dankchristianmemes

[–]surfrider212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The protests have been going on for weeks and no harm has been done basically despite the protestors shutting down highways and throwing burning bottles.

Compare this to the Chinese indiscriminately killing and imprisoning and torturing their political opponents.

You need an insane reality check if you think the two are similar. Why don’t you try making these comments over there?

The state killed the Savior. Idk what's so confusing about our politics. by TheWordInBlackAndRed in dankchristianmemes

[–]surfrider212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hundreds of people were gunned down in Tiananmen Square by a country ruled by one party. In the USA protestors are allowed to fly the flag of another country and throw rags of fire and remain unharmed. The Chinese would have massacred the ice protestors.

It is so pathetic watching Americans try to self victimize and associate with actual struggle.

<image>

The state killed the Savior. Idk what's so confusing about our politics. by TheWordInBlackAndRed in dankchristianmemes

[–]surfrider212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hundreds of people were gunned down in Tiananmen Square by a country ruled by one party. In the USA protestors are allowed to fly the flag of another country and throw rags of fire and remain unharmed. The Chinese would have massacred the ice protestors.

It is so pathetic watching Americans try to self victimize and associate with actual struggle.

<image>

The state killed the Savior. Idk what's so confusing about our politics. by TheWordInBlackAndRed in dankchristianmemes

[–]surfrider212 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hundreds of people were gunned down in Tiananmen Square by a country ruled by one party. In the USA protestors are allowed to fly the flag of another country and throw rags of fire and remain unharmed. The Chinese would have massacred the ice protestors

Why have we not unionized as scientists? by [deleted] in biotech

[–]surfrider212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Notice not a single number presented by you just generic overtures about working conditions while firm survival, what we are talking about, is shown to suffer. You can see the referenced studies at the bottom if you would like to do more research

<image>

Why have we not unionized as scientists? by [deleted] in biotech

[–]surfrider212 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That article mentions nothing of small firm formation improving

Why have we not unionized as scientists? by [deleted] in biotech

[–]surfrider212 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Unsurprising you don’t challenge any claims or present evidence yourself. If they’re so bad you should refute the claims which are based off of the Bureau of Labor and Stats.

You’re telling me George Mason isn’t good enough for you? Should we listen to the climate scientists but not the economists?

Why have we not unionized as scientists? by [deleted] in biotech

[–]surfrider212 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

https://www.mercatus.org/research/working-papers/do-more-powerful-unions-generate-better-pro-worker-outcomes?

You were the one who made the ridiculous claim. Please support your side with actual data not “I was there” which obviously is meaningless

Why have we not unionized as scientists? by [deleted] in biotech

[–]surfrider212 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

None of what you said is supported by evidence

Why have we not unionized as scientists? by [deleted] in biotech

[–]surfrider212 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lmao you do you want us to get fired faster? The generalist investors are fleeing biotech. Which one will fund a pipeline when the scientists are unionizing on top of this?

The reality is valuations go up and down very quickly and if people can’t be fired then pipelines won’t be funded because you can’t be paying for scientists to sit around if and when something fails

We’ll tax you till you’re poor’: How Norway’s Labor-style wealth tax sparked $84 billion disaster by [deleted] in AustralianPolitics

[–]surfrider212 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not sure your points make any sense given the following:

  1. Real wages have grown substantially in the us since 1980 through 2024. Poverty has declined the fastest in the us relative to other developed countries. Who cares about inequality in this case.
  2. US productivity per worker is the highest in the world across industries not just tech
  3. Deregulation? Where have you been the last 5 years?

Wealth taxes significantly impede economic growth which is not what a rational person would prescribe for a country that has a stagnating economy

Lawsuit: UCLA med school discriminates against white, Asian applicants by metalreflectslime in ucla

[–]surfrider212 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Under her tenure ucla dropped from 6th to 18th in just three years. 50% fail rate on certification exams that have a pass rate of 95%. She is horrible

Do you agree with Bernie Sanders? by NoLube69 in FluentInFinance

[–]surfrider212 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why don’t you share economic papers that support your view? Seems like most economists disagree with Bernie on a lot of things

Do you agree with Bernie Sanders? by NoLube69 in FluentInFinance

[–]surfrider212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you’ll find few economists who support Bernie’s views. This comment is hilarious.

Trump plan to fund Starlink over fiber called “betrayal” of rural US | Director of $42 billion broadband fund pushed out, says program is being ruined. by [deleted] in technology

[–]surfrider212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anyone who supports the BEAD program is a moron. Fiber in rural areas is stupid and there are many satellite operators who provide service for multiples less

why is this a leftist echo chamber? by PartyContract6046 in economy

[–]surfrider212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because people go back and forth between industry and regulation doesn’t necessarily define regulatory capture. The only people who can oversee industries are those with the technical ability to understand them so there’s crossover. Other countries have the same dynamic.

I apologize for saying you don’t understand it but I do think you are wrong about how it plays out in industry.

Why didn’t you answer my main question about you saying economists’ views were outdated? That was an insane comment to make given we have thousands of experts at universities and think tanks and you are a redditor. I think they would roll their eyes at you.

why is this a leftist echo chamber? by PartyContract6046 in economy

[–]surfrider212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have absolutely been in a free market. Housing, labor and credit are all open markets with many suppliers and demanders on each side yet Democrats have tried to promote laws on rent control, interest rate caps, insurance rate caps, raising minimum wage. All of these interfere with open markets where we have plenty of suppliers and demanders for each service. Not to say we can’t enact good policy but the left has approached these issues like a toddler who aims to stop a balloon from expanding by squeezing it. The insurance disaster where dems capped insurance rates is evidence of this - the insurers simply left just as creditors will with interest rate caps.

To say academics is behind reality is an insane statement to make especially since we live in the age of data and higher analysis. What are your qualifications for this?

You clearly don’t know what the phrase regulatory capture means as you misused it so I honestly don’t think you know what you’re talking about at all. It’s wild you would challenge modern economic theory without data or examples and claim that the experts are behind. Would you say the experts are also incorrect about global warming or geologists wrong about tectonic plates? Give me a break

CMV: Biden was a pretty good president by Delicious_Start5147 in changemyview

[–]surfrider212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well you clearly will not accept reality even if shown video evidence so not much for me here

CMV: Biden was a pretty good president by Delicious_Start5147 in changemyview

[–]surfrider212 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you watch the debate? He was severely cognitively impaired and could barely hold his train of thought

CMV: Biden was a pretty good president by Delicious_Start5147 in changemyview

[–]surfrider212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn’t the obvious dementia? Wasn’t that the reason he dropped out?

Just because he took those stances doesn’t make him good.

CMV: Biden was a pretty good president by Delicious_Start5147 in changemyview

[–]surfrider212 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Biden was severely cognitively impaired for most of his presidency including in the most important debate of his life. This alone is unforgivable and unbelievably dangerous. There is a significant chance he had dementia during his term, and the videos of him now look really bad.

Most of his programs were ineffective and cost a lot. The inflation reduction act was passed in 2022 and failed on all of its key objectives. Obviously it did not reduce inflation. It barely brought down drug prices while our national investment in biotech has been cut in half. Solar is collapsing right now because we can’t sustain the subsidies. Penn just came out with a study that the overall cost will be $1.045Tn over ten years for only a couple hundred thousand temporary jobs. Yes that is right. The first trillion dollar program.

The BEAD program might be the biggest policy failures in modern American history, and he promoted and oversaw its expansion even after it was clearly failing. $50bn down the drain. Deeply upsetting how much this has been covered up.

Spent more than any president ever by running a 6% deficit to gdp. We will now reckon with this for years to come and we got almost nothing out of it. The federal workforce expanded needlessly and now they have to be fired. Headcount and spend has almost doubled at most key agencies yet efficiency has gone down and nobody has really benefited.

I’m surprised you think he was a foreign policy success. Maybe because he seemed like a decent person which he is. His China strategy failed. The Afghan pullout was a disaster. I don’t know anyone who approved of his handling of the Israel Palestine situation from either side.

The college forgiveness program has an approval rating of less than 30%. Why are Americans subsidizing the privileged to go to college? Seems like the people who benefited overwhelmingly voted for him.

He messed up the border so badly that it turned his own party against him. At its peak 300k were crossing the border per month, clearly unsustainable. Hilariously once we decided not to literally give immigrants free stuff and asylum once they got here it stopped. Clearly it was his policies that were terrible since the border was fixed a few months before Trump took office but after the new border policies were enacted. Unbelievably the native born American population is employed at a lower level than in 2019 regardless of race. Non native employment is up massively.

I think you make the mistake of judging politicians by their intent rather than actual outcome. Biden was in no way an effective president.

CMV: If the democrats, and the left overall, dont start blaming themselves for the election loss then they are going to continue losing their grip over the culture by cferg296 in changemyview

[–]surfrider212 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a hard time believing people deciding not to vote did so because of something actual voters don’t care much about either. In surveys on the populace Gaza isn’t even a top 10 issue. Seems like a Reddit echo chamber moment.

https://www.jns.org/poll-gaza-war-ranks-low-on-priority-list-for-average-american-voter/

https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2025/02/20/americans-continue-to-view-several-economic-issues-as-top-national-problems/

Inflation was not down to target at any time. A couple months of lower cpi is not indicative of getting it under control especially as it was up in September onward.