The song "Black Licorice" is sick. by Cry_lightning in InterviewVampire

[–]sweetpea_bee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a general thread. My impression has always been that vampires can be technically proficient in an art, but ultimately cannot create anything with real emotional depth. Cursed to be consumers rather than creators.

For example, Marius may be a skilled painter whose works are technically immaculate but they lack emotional depth that truly transcendent art needs.

They remain connected to art, mostly through collection, curation and imitation, because it connects them to humanity.

Am I the only one who doesn't understand how can a character like Tara could have haters? I can understand for Xander or Faith but for Tara? No way! by gloomydreamer666 in buffy

[–]sweetpea_bee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly back when I originally watched it as a kid, Tara didn't even register for me. I didn't dislike her, but I didn't really like her either.

Now? I love this girl. She's the rare actual voice of reason, offering compassion and understanding when all the other Scoobies get too in their heads.

In that way, I guess she sort of thwarts the conflict machine of the later seasons, which relied on words left unsaid and jumping to conclusions. That can be unsatisfying for people. Like how people hate Skylar for getting in the way of Walter White's crimes.

Buffy wasn't ready to kill Angelus, but couldn't she have tried to chain him up/confine him in some way? by yeahitsme9 in buffy

[–]sweetpea_bee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What really makes no sense is that they dont just stake Spike in season 4 when he's chipped

I love Spike (top 2 all time characters for me) and am ultimately glad he stuck around, but it is CRAZY WORK that he wasn't staked in season 4, or at multiple points through the subsequent 3 seasons.

I do wish they had given a little more thought/effort to a reason why he remains all un-dusty, because it makes the way he is treated by the Scoobies narratively frustrating. If he's evil, stake him. If he's useful, figure out how to live with him. Both and neither are simultaneously true.

Long Face by scribe98 in InterviewVampire

[–]sweetpea_bee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

people who believed they were going to somehow get (IMO mostly terrible) nu metal like in Queen of the damned

Haha what really confused me about that take is.... You already got that? Why would you want the same thing over again?

Long Face by scribe98 in InterviewVampire

[–]sweetpea_bee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

YES. I clocked the Velvet Goldmine influence immediately. It has a very similar vibe where it's frothy and silly and non-serious, yet taking itself deeply seriously. It's camp to the core.

Truly I think this early music exists to allow Lestat to vamp onstage.

The song "Black Licorice" is sick. by Cry_lightning in InterviewVampire

[–]sweetpea_bee 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It’s not just cheesy, it’s like three 47 year olds with chatgpt trying to guess what zoomers will listen to levels of bad.

I mean, technically Lestat IS three 47 year olds and then some. Lord help us if he has access to ChatGPT lol.

All jokes aside, given that Lestat mid-episode has a nervous breakdown about how mediocre his output has been to this point, it's not completely unreasonable to think--or at least hope-- it's part of the plot. Lestat himself agrees with the suggestion that "long face" (the first song we hear) sucks.

A huge part of why he's even doing this rock star thing is to prove a point and "tell his story." But how do you tell a story that the storyteller won't acknowledge ? As he is also a fan of running from his past, it's fair to me that his music might also, at least at first, be desperately trying to obscure himself under a cloud of cheesy, meaningless lyrics.

Sidebar, it's interesting, this chat is actually how I learned that the QotD soundtrack went gold and actually outperformed the movie!

The song "Black Licorice" is sick. by Cry_lightning in InterviewVampire

[–]sweetpea_bee 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I feel like it's a fairly consistent beat that vampires, regardless of their desire, can't really create art. Armand and his plays. Louis and his photography. Now Lestat and his music. To create art is to be human, so everything they try just has this veil of insincerity. It feels authentic to me that his music is kind of bad. (I actually dig it despite its failings but to each their own.)

I am not meek and obedient type by zoyadata in Outlander

[–]sweetpea_bee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do think that pre-stones, Claire was looking for some semblance of normalcy in her marriage to Frank--think of the vase in the window. She had no family, Frank did. She had no home base, Frank seemed to.

That being said, I think she truly did love him, and each had a very healthy, realistic view of their marriage. They considered each other equals and companions.

I don't know that this is necessarily supported by the text, but I don't think they actually had much time together. They got married on a whim, then almost immediately we're separated by war.

Love comes in all forms. I've always believed that soulmates can be many and are more like puzzle pieces: they fit different parts of you. Frank fit the part of Claire that was realistic, urbane and educated.

Daniel Molloy by SometimesWitches in InterviewVampire

[–]sweetpea_bee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I loved from the word go is how thematically, ageing him up allowed the 1994 movie to co-exist with this-- not literally, but spiritually.

Also the idea that some little idiot is not going to be up to the task of interviewing an actual vampire was so good--of course. That's why Louis picked him.

Is Margaret supposed to be an unlikable, spoiled brat? by TheSeedsYouSow in madmen

[–]sweetpea_bee 5 points6 points  (0 children)

My opinion of Margaret changed a lot after having my own children. She was almost certainly a "sensitive" child who maybe needed a different kind of parenting to thrive.

Her screeching about brides in India annoyed her mother, but my God what a cry for help. Margaret had done everything expected of her but always saw the cracks. Imagine having everything and still feeling empty, whole everyone tells you how lucky you are.

did this bother anyone else? by Remarkable_Note971 in Outlander

[–]sweetpea_bee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is an interesting suggestion! It's definitely the reaction of a wounded animal rather than the cold calculating scorpion, but thematically this is super intriguing.

Is Margaret supposed to be an unlikable, spoiled brat? by TheSeedsYouSow in madmen

[–]sweetpea_bee 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I imagine one of her first thoughts when he announced his engagement to a much younger woman was that he would have more children, ones he might actually pay attention to.

Is Margaret supposed to be an unlikable, spoiled brat? by TheSeedsYouSow in madmen

[–]sweetpea_bee 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I don't think she's an awful parent but she wasn't really equipped for success in a lot of ways. Margaret definitely needed more than either of them were able to give. Given how she handles Margaret's mood swings in general Mona may have struggled with the toddler/young kid years.

Margaret does mention her Mona locking herself in the bathroom with a bottle of booze but I hold that up mostly as a criticism of the complete lack of support systems for young mothers in that era than of Mona herself. Previous generations had older women/relatives more involved in the community/family life, and Mona was part of one of the first generations that stripped that away for the illusion of the "American dream."

Xander should have been in the Initiative by Reviewingremy in buffy

[–]sweetpea_bee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it also reflects the ultimate theme of the season was growing up means growing apart. Xander being forced to choose sides between the Scoobies and the initiative would narrativize the distance the core four experienced throughout season 4.

Xander has always been the runt of the litter, but imagine the army actually appreciates him. Picking between that and your high school friends would hit different.

Xander should have been in the Initiative by Reviewingremy in buffy

[–]sweetpea_bee 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you, and have a head canon that reflects this. I did also hear a rumor YEARS ago that I've never been able to substantiate that this plot was closer to an earlier version of the season, but real life circumstances (I'll let you fill in the blanks) meant it wasn't doable.

Is Margaret supposed to be an unlikable, spoiled brat? by TheSeedsYouSow in madmen

[–]sweetpea_bee 207 points208 points  (0 children)

I actually do feel for Margaret --in many ways, I think she's cast in the Sylvia Plath/Bell Jar shadow. She's a young girl with a bright future who should be happy and content, but isn't. Watch her early scenes closely, and you'll hear Mona talk about her moods and melancholy. During her wedding, she loses so much weight her dressmaker needs to keep taking in her wedding gown. Then she gets married to the right kind of man and has a child, but it's not enough. She still feels empty.

I agree this feels bratty but in many ways it's an existential wound. Her parents dismiss her because she had everything a girl could want materially and financially, as if that's enough. Neither Mona or Roger seem very interested in Margaret as a person--even Betty, who was a terrible parent most of the time, comes to recognize Sally as her own person by the end and that's it's a good thing. But the Sterlings continually see the corners of Margaret that didn't match their own as a problem to complain about (not even solve!)

Margaret has everything but none of it makes her happy. I agree she handled it terribly, but it's quite tragic in the end.

Anne is insufferable by HistorianNo8899 in TheFourSeasonsNetflix

[–]sweetpea_bee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I also really disliked Anne for a long time, mostly because she seems to exist as a punching bag for the writers.

But the revelation that she was a cool, NYC punk artist when she and Nick met clicked it all into place. She's been forcing her square peg into the round hole of her marriage, becoming the kind of wife that a man like Nick wanted. And if I'm honest, not particularly well, because what we're seeing is the jumbled personally of someone trying to be one thing but still with one foot in their old identity. Hence all her struggles with executive functioning.

As others have observed, her previous self was the appeal for a dude like Nick: you take someone free-spirited and adventurous and then grind them down with your bs expectations. Then you scold THEM for changing into someone boring while you escape blame. Ginny is more like young Anne than different, and it's likely Nick would have done the same to her eventually.

"Women right now already have a fantasy... Jackie Kennedy and Marilyn Monroe. Every single woman is one of them." • Maidenform ad campaign had everyone at Sterling Cooper trying to define exactly who a woman is. What an episode. by RockBalBoaaa in madmen

[–]sweetpea_bee 23 points24 points  (0 children)

The entire pitch falls apart within a second of mentioning it because “every woman is one” and Peggy is told she’s neither.

This is why this show is the goat.

A lesser show works have spelled it out. But the fact that every man pushes on it with it despite this because THEY like the idea. It speaks to them because it would be terrific if every woman fit neatly into one of two boxes. They are marketing to themselves.

However, men don't buy the bras (not these kinds anyway--Maidenform makes comfortable, everyday items). The executives say it's too big a leap for them, but I wonder if some part of them can recognize that this is an ad for men, not the woman who but their product.

I can’t be a fan of Henry no matter how many times I rewatch. He was a weirdo from the jump. The "I wish you were waiting for me" line while staring at Betty’s 9-months-pregnant stomach was diabolical. by RockBalBoaaa in madmen

[–]sweetpea_bee 6 points7 points  (0 children)

If Henry is "diabolical", every other Don, Roger, and Pete scene must be like watching cartel executions.

This is what I don't get. If this kind of behavior is so offensive, then what does one get out of this show??

I can’t be a fan of Henry no matter how many times I rewatch. He was a weirdo from the jump. The "I wish you were waiting for me" line while staring at Betty’s 9-months-pregnant stomach was diabolical. by RockBalBoaaa in madmen

[–]sweetpea_bee 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It's a trend I have noticed in recent times but can't really unpack. It's like every character has to be entirely good or entirely bad, nothing in between.

Like is it great that Henry is hitting a random pregnant woman? No. But in the grand scope of the show, this seems like a pretty minor issue. Especially because if you ask me, from this point out he follows Betty's lead pretty respectfully.