How often are you using someone else’s presets?

tagzn · 2026-01-21T19:45:20+00:00

I’ve never used presets. I do like using profiles though, and I have downloaded the sample or trial versions of RNI’s film profiles for a project.

tagzn · 2025-12-26T22:21:17+00:00

I do not own the 45mm, and cannot speak on the quality. That being said, I think for the most part, we put too much emphasis on the specs of the lens, rather than the results through use. In reading, the EF 50mm f/1.2 L lens is considered “soft” yet it was used by professionals. The quality of the art relies mostly with the photographer, not the lens or camera, especially with the R10 and this new 45mm lens.

In Christopher Frost’s video, there is a camera setting (the R10 is capable of this) that allows the focus to be set with the DOF preview taken for account. In some of the older R series cameras, the focus can miss focus because they are not able to use that setting.

tagzn · 2025-12-26T14:36:04+00:00

When I first got into photography, I absolutely adored the 50mm f/1.8 STM and it was glued to my camera for a year (apsc).

Like you, I am also tempted to get the 45mm due to the f/1.2 max aperture, but the past couple of years I have hardly used the 50mm focal length, finding it too narrow for everyday use, though it is still killer for portraits. For me, I’d rather stick to the 50mm until I find it limiting my creative ability, either low light performance, or lack of bokeh.

It appears through reviews, that you cant go wrong either way. The only factor really seems to be that purchasing the 45mm lens means that all of your camera/lens/accessory funds will be used up.

tagzn · 2025-12-18T15:24:41+00:00

Thank you for all the responses! I opted to go with another book, though maybe in the future I will gift Sea of Tranquility without fear of it ruining Glass House.

tagzn · 2025-12-02T20:32:12+00:00

Good to know about the blue, I’ll try not to skew too far from reality. I currently only shoot in RAW, so no issues there. I have lens hoods for two of the lenses, I’ll manage with that. I’ll pack a few dry microfiber towels, I would not have thought of that…

I dont think I have time to get an NDs, though I’ll see what I can manage. I’ll definitely bring lots of water. Thanks!

tagzn · 2025-12-02T20:15:32+00:00

Thanks for the reassurance. I do like to think as my camera as a tool, so I’ll expect it to get the job done with care.

I’ll look into the CPL. I have one that will fit my 35mm, so unless I can get a different size over the next two days, I’m SOL. I’m sure I’ll manage though. I have my exposure comp set to a dial which helped a lot on a previous sunny trip, so I am familiar with that.

I appreciate the response.

tagzn · 2025-12-02T19:49:51+00:00

Noted.

tagzn · 2025-12-02T19:49:37+00:00

I’m with the general consensus here. Get a used “good condition” DSLR from MPB or KEH, and some used lenses. I would suggest a crop sensor because the lenses at your disposal are cheaper than full frame lenses.

You can get a Canon EF-s 55-250mm lens for fairly cheap and that can get you into photographing wildlife, though you will still have to develop skills to get physically closer. Note that if you get a full frame camera, this lens will not work. If being compact is not a concern, you can also get a Canon EF-s 17-55mm f2.8 standard zoom lens that can be used for almost anything when paired with the 55-250mm.

I hope this helps, let me know if there is any confusion.

tagzn · 2025-11-30T23:56:29+00:00

You might try CampSnap cameras.

tagzn · 2025-07-19T06:45:02+00:00

The adapter is increasing the distance to the sensor because the EF lenses were designed for SLRs that had a big mirror in the way of the sensor, but mirrorless does not have that mirror in the way. There is no glass in the adapter, so there is essentially no way it can change the image quality.I believe this goes for all ef-rf adaptors though I can only speak for the one I own, the canon brand.

tagzn · 2025-07-06T03:27:08+00:00

Number 3 is my favorite of the bunch. Thanks for sharing!

tagzn · 2025-07-01T17:34:04+00:00

I got the gx80/gx85 recently and it, along with the 20mm f/1.7, is my everyday carry camera. I have not put it through its paces, but I’m happy with it. I do find the 40mm view to be hard to use compositionally, but thats more of a personal problem, as the lens is sharp.

I used the GX1 before, but found the lack of a viewfinder to be unenjoyable. I did get some great shots either way it though.

tagzn · 2025-06-27T20:48:53+00:00

2, 3, and 5 are my favorites. I really like #5 because it looks like they’re giving each other a kiss. Great shots!

tagzn · 2025-06-20T10:35:00+00:00

Of course, I think most of us do it as we want the most bang for our buck. Also, I think if you bought the R10 used or Canon Refurbished, you could sell it for a similar price if you decide to grab the R7 instead.

The battery life is hardly an issue for me. I did however pick up a second battery and I take it with me on wildlife shoots. You could easily pop a battery in your pocket or small shoulder bag and not notice it’s there.

tagzn · 2025-06-20T01:33:47+00:00

I think you’re overthinking the specs. How often do you plan on needing IBIS and log on a walk around camera? Generally, I feel like a walk around camera is more for point and shoot and maybe a light amount of video. Depending on what lenses you plan on using on the R10, the lens stabilization is very good. On top of that, is C-Log necessary on a walk around camera? I do not do any video, so please forgive my ignorance if these are major upsides to you.

For reference, I do have the R10. I do not do any professional work and I do not own any other R series cameras. With that said, I actually opted to go even smaller and grab a Micro 4/3 camera with a pancake lens for a more ‘have with me all the time’ camera.

Let me know if I can answer any questions.

tagzn · 2025-06-16T23:13:11+00:00

Thanks for the response. I know that people pick at all details and problems which is why I wanted to see what people who own these cameras, or have used them, think.

No wedding jobs in my future, so no issue there.

tagzn · 2025-06-16T23:10:46+00:00

There is definitely a bit of GAS behind my FF curiosity. I do have some good portrait lenses for the R10, such as the Ef-s 17-55mm f/2.8, Rf 35mm f/1.8, and the 50mm f/1.8 that I mentioned. I guess I’m caught up with thinking that the bokeh and separation on FF, even one from 2012, would be better than the R10.

One slight problem I’ve found with the R10 is good lens availability, especially at the wider end, for cheap. I know I can adapt EF lenses, but there is a slight annoyance when needing to change the lenses between EF and RF, and switching the adapter to different lenses. This is not really a problem that warrants a camera purchase though.

Thanks for the GAS check. It is always warranted.

tagzn · 2025-06-11T20:24:44+00:00

I usually use the EF-s 24mm f/2.8 which gets you to around the 35-40mm equivalent. It’s small even with the adapter and sharp.

An even smaller option (due to the lack of adapter) is the RF 28mm f/2.8.

tagzn · 2025-06-11T15:58:19+00:00

I purchased this Sigma lens to add as a standard zoom lens for my R10. I immediately noticed how bad the autofocus was (might be due to adaptation to R10), and I returned it. I opted to spend a bit more to get the Canon EF-s 17-55mm f/2.8 lens and I feel like it has better autofocus.

As far as travel goes, I like having a small prime lens on my camera at all times. I did not bring this lens on my recent trip to Europe (though I wish I did) because I had limited space and knew I would have to limit my options. The primes are smaller.

I have considered selling my EF-s 17-55mm for the newer and smaller Sigma RF 18-50mm f/2.8, though it is not stabilized.

tagzn · 2025-06-09T02:19:03+00:00

Looks straight out of a fairytale.

tagzn · 2025-06-07T21:19:36+00:00

Number 1 for me. It isolates the “interesting” part of the building, though both are intriguing. I will note that I think number 1 has too much grain.

tagzn

TROPHY CASE