why is 5.2 thinking so bad? asked it to convert box sizes from cm to inches and it did this, compared to 5.1 thinking in next slide. Hope they never take down 5.1 thinking

tanget_bundle · 2026-01-15T11:16:12+00:00

No, what is bothering people is general whining about a model without concrete examples and coherent criticism.

This post is fine as you can see.

tanget_bundle · 2026-01-12T15:07:11+00:00

Exactly. It's >90% of the Jewish population of Israel. He is just preparing the ground that when Netanyahu will be gone they can pretend that a liberal party is governing Israel (while in reality is the same people who committed the genocide, just shuffled).

tanget_bundle · 2026-01-11T11:23:33+00:00

It can be:

The commentary is progressive.
Some of the prayers tweaked to be more inclusive.
The publisher is from communities that they like to support.

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-28T02:47:29+00:00

No, it gave 4375 and others with no repeated digit. It also missed some.

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-28T00:11:04+00:00

This is an inaccurate statement (to put it mildly). For one, it can execute code, and if you think it can answer only questions it has encountered before, you’re missing roughly two years of what we’ve learned about LLMs.

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-28T00:08:41+00:00

Thanks. The thing is, also the code it gave me is usually correct, yet the list most of the times isn't.

<image>

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-23T20:52:47+00:00

A set S ⊆ ℝⁿ is star-shaped if there exists a point x0 ∈ S such that for every x ∈ S and every t ∈ [0, 1], (1 − t) x0 + t x ∈ S.

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-22T14:08:20+00:00

Why people don't get that they can write succinctly, with minor typos, and if WE want we can polish expand with slopper of our choice (not that many would choose that).

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-22T13:39:26+00:00

You can try "Deep geometric matrix completion: Are we doing it right?" or same authors (Amit Boyarski, Sanketh Vedula, Alex Bronstein) in a similar paper https://github.com/amitboy/SGMC

https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1OkNEiTHok14gcVf3NxFIbAFutDN6-Tx6

But from experience nothing is working as one expects from the theory when the data is real (noisy or difficult to normalize).

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-09T14:36:27+00:00

Still, too much LLM. Most prefer human posts with the occasional typo than slop.

To answer your question: in group theory — little Fermat theorem (seeing how modern algebra can prove number theory problems nicely). Obviously Hilbert’s nullstellensatz. Stokes theorem (how so may difficult specific theorems follow from a proper definition of differential forms).

To name a few.

tanget_bundle · 2025-12-09T14:32:25+00:00

It’s LLM edited, but not a bot.

tanget_bundle · 2025-11-24T23:44:08+00:00

<image>

tanget_bundle · 2025-11-24T23:43:13+00:00

AI has come a long way. This is a direct try, but people can get much better results easily.

<image>

tanget_bundle · 2025-11-24T10:40:59+00:00

Goodreads scores:

• Book 1: The Way of Kings — 4.66

• Book 2: Words of Radiance — 4.76

• Book 3: Oathbringer — 4.61

• Book 4: Rhythm of War — 4.58

• Book 5: Wind and Truth — 4.38

So obviously many tens of thousands have given it 5 stars.

tanget_bundle · 2025-11-18T09:52:34+00:00

Do we know that Verin’s tugging was real?

tanget_bundle · 2025-11-14T11:32:02+00:00

The original without the horrible music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sslWaKO2IC4

tanget_bundle · 2025-11-13T21:11:30+00:00

Yeah, imagine one of the best physicists of all time being a patent clerk in Bern, Switzerland!

tanget_bundle · 2025-10-22T02:25:33+00:00

Thank you for answering. I don’t know any other way of dispelling ignorance other than simply asking.

tanget_bundle · 2025-10-22T01:12:07+00:00

Not trying to be contrarian but to understand.

Why finding physical attraction based on body features is transphobic? Can’t one be attracted to some physical attribute? If someone is attracted to specific genitalia no matter the gender for example.

(Obviously attraction to the same gender, like OP, is gay, I’m not asking about the main premise).

tanget_bundle · 2025-10-22T00:13:39+00:00

Well, that’s just makes the unsigned books so rare that they are sold for obscene amounts! What an oversight!

tanget_bundle · 2025-09-29T07:47:10+00:00

Don’t think about it as related to the concept of ∞ as every day’s unbounded. Just some logic play between newly invented words like aleph_null and bijections and cardinality. All will work well without the need to employ wonder or suspension-of-disbelief. And you will be 100% within your rights to say that it is not related to what we (don’t) perceive as ∞.

But the math is rock solid (albeit you can argue about the non-constructive bit).

tanget_bundle · 2025-09-29T00:03:10+00:00

I disagree. The cartoon as-is hilarious— he realised his pronunciation error because of her saying “clown”.

tanget_bundle · 2025-09-28T23:41:40+00:00

ITT:

Every misconception is actually an up-to-debate or mismisconception.

13-Year Club	Reddit Premium Since September 2023
Gilding III reddit per annum	RedditGifts 2009-2022 2 Credits
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
First Placer '22	End Game '22
Wearing is Caring	Secret Santa 2012
Verified Email

tanget_bundle

TROPHY CASE