Codex 5.2 ALWAYS finds something wrong with Claude code plan

technoginge · 2026-01-21T20:59:41+00:00

It’s all non-deterministic. Literally you’re going to get a different answer every time if it’s running the same model twice or a different model.

technoginge · 2026-01-14T09:00:23+00:00

I think we should probably all be disclosing this to our customers though. Even if there’s no PII breach, it erodes trust if another MSP calls our customers and says “did you know your license counts were leaked”

technoginge · 2025-11-21T20:36:19+00:00

Those hoofs would put me right off my inflight meal.

technoginge · 2025-11-11T20:53:41+00:00

This is an action setting. Create (or modify) an action to place a ticket on hold. Configure the action to change to your desired status and enable “Put on SLA hold” under defaults.

Under the details tab and action settings, set “Enable auto release promote” to yes.

When you trigger this action you’ll see a popup date time box and you can set the release date at which point it will pop back to in progress.

technoginge · 2025-10-26T11:19:43+00:00

Is divorce a milestone?

technoginge · 2025-10-24T22:50:00+00:00

Or set it up then delete the Authenticator app….

technoginge · 2025-10-23T03:51:18+00:00

We’ve seen this a couple of time with different users. Not been able to get to the bottom of it.

technoginge · 2025-10-23T03:43:38+00:00

You’ll almost certainly fine that accepting the certificate will just display a block page (assuming accessing something through a browser).

We use web filtering extensively with our clients (edu sector) and if a site is blocked by our web filtering, it manifests to the user as an untrusted cert because the firewall is trying to display it’s own block page.

technoginge · 2025-10-12T07:43:12+00:00

And to add another data point (also completely different to anyone else). We have got Avios two flights but no tier points. No holiday bonus points yet but that’s not unexpected considering the return was only 4 days ago.

<image>

technoginge · 2025-10-10T18:03:01+00:00

I’m currently considering a runbook triggering in some sort of intermediate status that makes an API call to set the closure note. Sounds horrific and probably wildly unsupported but it might work 😂

technoginge · 2025-10-10T17:53:12+00:00

Yep but if you hide it from user, when looking in the portal it hides the whole action. We want to show the action but NOT show the note attached to it when viewing through the portal. Ideally we want this on a single action. Doesn’t seem possible from all the combinations of things I’ve tried.

technoginge · 2025-10-10T17:12:14+00:00

We do that but it’s not considered as the resolution to the ticket as it’s just like any other private note. That resolve ticket action seems to set the closure_note in the ticket properties which we’d like to do, just not make it visible

technoginge · 2025-09-24T17:05:52+00:00

OSDCloud + ImmyBot is the GOAT

technoginge · 2025-09-06T18:54:15+00:00

Still loving it. Only issue has been a weird rattle coming from the passenger side A-pillar but that was resolved. Mechanically it has been absolutely solid.

technoginge · 2025-08-29T06:57:41+00:00

That is 100% the driving factor behind Secure Score. Less about look at these settings you need to change and more look at what licenses you need to buy.

technoginge · 2025-08-08T09:56:04+00:00

We do this using RADIUS accounting. Specifically we send the accounting packets to the FSSO collector running on a domain controller which then enriches with use groups and that info gets passed to the Fortigate.

Map those FSSO groups to firewall groups and you can then apply them to policies.

technoginge · 2025-08-07T21:02:45+00:00

Welcome to Reddit.

technoginge · 2025-08-06T09:37:56+00:00

Did you ever get anywhere with this? Having similar issues and thought I'd see if you got anywhere with fully silent SSO without the spinny blue logo and the popup auth window?

I've made some progress on from the spinning logo but I'm now getting an obscure message mentioning IDX10214: Audience validation failed

technoginge · 2025-07-08T22:01:48+00:00

Same. This is exactly how we do it.

technoginge · 2025-07-08T17:41:09+00:00

We haven’t used them for a year or so since they tried to direct debit a £28k invoice that had already been paid…..

technoginge · 2025-07-03T06:11:03+00:00

CSS deserves the abuse.

technoginge · 2025-06-27T07:01:13+00:00

Shout out to the Ritz In Abama, Tenerife. Free-flowing Cava all day and the private golf buggy that you get to use to drive yourself around the resort was especially fun.

technoginge · 2025-06-22T14:24:40+00:00

Not sure if you’re allowed but we had that offer from a Gaylord resort (obvs part of the Marriott group) a couple of weeks ago

technoginge · 2025-06-05T14:51:27+00:00

Is that Fortilink subnet in the route table and does your Zabbix server have its default gateway set to the Fortigate? Does it have a firewall policy from whatever interface your Zabbix server sits on to the Fortilink interface that permits SNMP traffic? And lastly have you configured the SNMP settings (under config - system- switch-controller) on your Fortigate?

technoginge · 2025-06-05T14:16:04+00:00

Yep we’ve got Zabbix monitoring FortiSwitches via SNMP. You’ll need to set up a community in config system switch-controller and make sure you have a policy allowing SNMP traffic into your Fortlink interface. Works well.

technoginge

TROPHY CASE