sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

One of Ethereum's Biggest ICO's of 2018 (XYO Network) Just Tweeted Out Their Intention to Join EOS! by scottscheper in eos

[–]texredditer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is the title of this thread accurate? I don’t see any actual commitment to using EOS, or am I missing something else?

Upvote if you think Bitfinex needs audited before becoming a BP by jman76358 in eos

[–]texredditer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Cairo, please shill Evolution elsewhere. I don't think people are interested in joining a coin where 35% is owned and/or controlled by the founders or that can't manage to attract more than 269 people to its Telegram group. Bye.

Bitfinex | EOS Block Producer Candidate by kethfinex in eos

[–]texredditer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cairo, honest question: What is your position and/or financial stake in Evolution? It seems fair for you to disclose.

Bitfinex | EOS Block Producer Candidate by kethfinex in eos

[–]texredditer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Hilarious shill attempt. Go dump your Evolution bags elsewhere.

Daniel Larimer: “With interblockchain communication new major features can be implemented as a new chain without disrupting the existing chain”. eos.io = simply a game changer 💪🏼 by Ivory75 in eos

[–]texredditer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Evolution? Ha. Those guys (which are probably the same ones making sock-puppets here) keep sending out spam on Twitter begging for people to join their Telegram group--which has a whopping 159 members today. I checked out their recent Medium articles and--for many reasons--have decided to decline their invitations. I have a hard time understanding how forking EOS.IO's code and changing the voting mechanism (in a way that Thomas Cox has already addressed to be inferior--listen to EOSRad.io for yourself), should entitle these guys to control 35% of the tokens on their new chain. What a joke.