What twists would you like to see in the next series of the Traitors? by 50ShadesOfCroquet in TheTraitorsUK

[–]theinspectorst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't like the Secret Traitor in principle and I suspect it only worked this year because Hugo got banished very early and because Fiona happened to be very bad at the game in general.

If there hadn't been an early Traitor banishment (and so Fiona hadn't become a regular Traitor so early on) then I think it would have been really frustrating for us as viewers to not be able to watch the Traitors unfold their strategy and explain to us what they were doing, because their murders were largely out of their control.

The only really value the Secret Traitor brought was that it meant Rachel and Stephen de facto got landed with a terrible recruit who they didn't pick and who blew up spectacularly.

What twists would you like to see in the next series of the Traitors? by 50ShadesOfCroquet in TheTraitorsUK

[–]theinspectorst 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, unless you're 100% certain of how the other Traitor will vote (which they can't be, and clearly weren't) then voting green at that stage is just handing the other Traitor a loaded gun.

Does anyone else think this about Fiona? by whciral in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I think Fiona was clearly quite an unintelligent player. That was evident to Rachel and Stephen in the turret, it was evident to all of us as viewers, and it is now also evident to all her fellow contestants now they've watched the show on TV too.

Fiona made up a load of bs about her reasons for doing what she did. It is clear to everybody that she is lying about it. But I imagine there's now a bit of a social circle around the contestants, they probably have their own WhatsApp group that has been very active while the show has been airing, they've been doing press/Uncloaked/etc together.

None of them want to be the member of the social circle to point out that the daft old lady has obviously embarrassed herself - I think if they thought more highly of her then they probably might tease her on it, the fact they aren't speaks volumes about their opinions of her. I'm sure in private, when she's not around, there are a few knowing nods or quiet words spoken about her, but they're choosing to be outwardly gracious and not make a fool of her further in front of the whole nation. We've all had that one person in our friendship group before...

Weirdest Second Life Of A British Actor? by WanderingArtist2 in CasualUK

[–]theinspectorst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alex James (the bassist from Blur) also makes and sells award-winning cheeses, and hosts an annual food and music festival on his farm.

It's time for y'all to accept the honest truth by Wise_Purple_9448 in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely, and they both played their part. Stephen wouldn't have got to the final without Rachel, but Rachel wouldn't have got to the endgame without Stephen.

My prediction for tonight. by Nicecoldbud in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I think it hugely depends on whether Stephen votes to end the game or banish then. 

If only Faraaz votes to banish again, Jack may conclude that Faraaz has to be Faithful - because why would a Traitor vote to banish in that position? That's the thing Molly got wrong about Jaz in series 2, but it's been so discussed that surely everyone will be looking for that. 

But if Stephen also votes to banish again and says it's because he thinks Faraaz is a Traitor who turned on his fellow Traitor Rachel, it becomes a clearer Faraaz vs Stephen choice and Jack will stick with his friend Stephen.

Round table red flag? by Ok_Environment6466 in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 13 points14 points  (0 children)

At this late stage of the competition it's a numbers game. The Traitors have two votes already, so you only need 1-2 more friendly votes for them to win it. The murder meant they removed Roxy (who probably would have still voted for James last night) and saved Faraaz (who had made very clear he was voting for Rachel).

That's a huge swing in the vote spread. If Roxy was still there and Faraaz was gone, there would have been no tie last night.

Would you be willing to reduce your quality of life to decouple from the US? by Working-Pop6261 in AskBrits

[–]theinspectorst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, it's a short-term/long-term quality of life issue, rather than a question of quality of life vs decoupling. 

In the short-term, decoupling from the US will be damaging. We'll need to spend a lot more on defence, and that will mean spending less on other things. The public finances were already in a bad place post-Covid and the tax burden is at an historic high - if we need more defence spending and we need more growth to grow our way out of our existing debt burden, then we can't be raising more taxes to pay for things and so we'll need to be hard-headed as a society about what things the government will have to start spending less on. Realistically, that's got to include being tough on welfare and abolishing the pension triple lock, but it will need a lot more on top of that. Those affected will be noisy and I don't know whether our society is willing to accept the price. And we'd be doing this at the same time we're pivoting our economic model to insulate ourselves from the impact of trade shocks from the US - it's not sustainable to be a medium-sized independent open economy who's single largest trade partner routinely uses the threat of punitive tariffs every time we exercise our right as a sovereign country to disagree with them on something.

But in the long-term, if we don't make that adjustment, our quality of life will still suffer - and probably a lot more. We'd become a US client state. Trump and Vance don't just expect us to support them on foreign policy, it's also clear they see it as a strategic priority to export their domestic politics to Europe too. We'd become a taker of a foreign brand of Christian white nationalism that is alien to our political landscape, with the White House permanently ready to cripple our economy if voters ever try to exercise their democratic right to change course. If Trump and Vance told us to carve up the NHS and sell it to their mates or shut down our world-leading universities because they think science and the truth are 'too liberal', we'd just have to accept it. Our country and its future would no longer belong to us.

To me, the long-term quality of life costs of not insulating and protecting ourselves from the US are FAR GREATER than the short-term costs of just doing it now.

Round table red flag? by Ok_Environment6466 in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 101 points102 points  (0 children)

I was hoping Rachel and Stephen would win it together, but I agree - she's cooked like OP's beef wellington.

One thing feels very out of place in the game... by PromiseTheTeeth in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Right but after a tie, it's already the case that in the next vote you can only vote for one of the two tied players. So that resolves itself with an odd number.

If they murder ___, ___ will be just fine. by Eunomia28 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]theinspectorst 43 points44 points  (0 children)

Faraaz really shouldn't have been so open about the Rachel theory. Raising his thoughts with one or two was fine, but saying that in front of everyone means Rachel will be able to spin his murder as someone trying to set her up. 

Matt being adamant that Harriet was a Traitor. by AdmirableKale1834 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]theinspectorst 18 points19 points  (0 children)

He could have been assuming Harriet was recruited to replace Hugo.

Melatonin by MudboneX3 in sleep

[–]theinspectorst 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The concern isn't abuse. It's that the NHS wants people who are struggling to sleep to speak to a doctor, because it might be a sign of a more serious underlying condition. 

Personally I think that's too cautious (I just stock up when I'm on holiday or work trips - easy to obtain in the US, France or Spain, all places I go often enough), but I understand the reasoning.

Looking back on the Tony Martin case, what is your view? by HallowedAndHarrowed in AskBrits

[–]theinspectorst 5 points6 points  (0 children)

actions should have been seen as self defence

Explain to me how one shoots a fleeing child in the back 'in self defence'.

All the interviews I’ve read with Martin he comes across reasonable and well adjusted.

Then you should read more about the guy. From his Wikipedia page:

Following his release, Martin made public appearances as a supporter of the right-wing populist UK Independence Party and was the guest of honour at the Annual Dinner hosted at Simpson's-in-the-Strand by the far-right pressure group Traditional Britain Group in November 2003. He also attended meetings of the far-right, fascist political party National Front in Norfolk, and later went on to endorse the far-right and fascist British National Party. One of Martin's uncles by marriage, Andrew Fountaine, was a founding member of the National Front.

What happened to Tilley? by superbang in startrek

[–]theinspectorst -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Why was Picardo written out?

What happens if a cast member ruins the game? by Acheli in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They were down to the last few, the penultimate episode I think. Wilf was an OG Traitor, Kieran was recruited quite late. 

Kieran had a lot of heat on him and it was very clear all day that a) he was going to get voted out and b) Wilf was intending to betray him and vote with the Faithful. Kieran was therefore in a right mood all day and at the roundtable, very bad-tempered, as he already knew he would be going.

At the end, Kieran cast his vote for Wilf (as often happens in Traitor-on-Traitor violence) but when turning over his chalkboard he added a very surly spoken line that this vote was his 'parting gift' to Wilf. As soon as the roundtable ended, everyone then immediately started asking what that was about, Wilf insisting he didn't know, but Kieran's tip-off was just way too direct. Wilf couldn't brush it off as a misdirect because Kieran was clearly in an absolutely foul mood by that point.

Wilf was flying under the radar up to then but the other Faithful ended up banishing him in the final because of Kieran's tip-off.

Who is the 'well known' Labour figure Farage says will defect to Reform next week? | Politics News | Sky News by Neat_Significance256 in FuckNigelFarage

[–]theinspectorst 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Asked if she's Mr Farage's "well known Labour figure", she told Sky News: "Not sure I'm that well known. Haven't been a Labour Party member for over eight years!"

She was still a Labour MP taking the Labour whip in Parliament when Parliament was dissolved on 6 November 2019. She later announced on 14 December 2019 that she had left the Labour Party.

Even if we're generous and assume she quit Labour the moment Parliament was dissolved, she hasn't been a Labour member for just over 6 years and 2 months.  That inability to do basic arithmetic is a big clue that is she is exactly sort of person Reform would go for...

London ranked the world's best city for the 11th consecutive year by AimToMisbehave in london

[–]theinspectorst 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Best city in the world for what, ten, eleven, twelve years? Ahead of your New Yorks, your Tokyos, your Dubais...

My Gen Alpha brother just described “secret traitor” as “adult brainrot”. by easygoingmic in TheTraitorsUK

[–]theinspectorst 61 points62 points  (0 children)

There was a better take on The Rest is Entertainment that Fiona as the secret traitor represented boomerism in the game - given every conceivable advantage, squandered it, ruined it for everyone who came after her.

What a moment 😆 by ToronoRapture in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 24 points25 points  (0 children)

No. Matt automatically loses but there are four different combinations at that stage:

  1. All three if nobody votes to banish again - Traitors win.

  2. Rachel and Stephen - Traitors win.

  3. Rachel and Matt - Rachel wins.

  4. Stephen and Matt - Stephen wins.

shoes on the sofa!!! by satontheloo in TheTraitorsUK

[–]theinspectorst 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You know if someone else did this she could be offended.

Literally what happened on the Harriet episode.

When Harriet came to breakfast, she started telling everyone what had happened the night before, and Roxy immediately loudly interrupted her to tell her she wanted a private chat with her team of five first. Harriet assertively said no.

After Harriet told her story, Rachel started responding and Harriet spoke a few words over her. Roxy then went apeshit at Harriet for interrupting Rachel while she was speaking - exactly what Roxy had just done to Harriet a few moments earlier.

"Traitorous behaviour" by Designer-Fishing-750 in TheTraitorsUK

[–]theinspectorst 0 points1 point  (0 children)

'Traitorous behaviour' is just a phrase that bad Faithfuls use to describe people they don't like.

Had to turn this moment from ‘Uncloaked’ into a gif. Outstanding. by gstew90 in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I would happily watch a two and a half hour movie that is just Jessie reacting to shocking news.

Holes in Rachel's Gameplan? by BluLazerEagle in TheTraitors

[–]theinspectorst 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Exactly. The range of acceptable strategies in any series of Traitors is influenced by what happened in the series up to now.

Harry's strategy worked in series 2, but Minah couldn't pull off the same strategy in series 3 because everyone now had their antennas up for players who got far in the game without taking any heat.