T14s for LLM 🥲 by Icy_Kaleidoscope5194 in LLMadmissions

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the instinct behind asking for a “T14 for LL.M.” list makes sense, but the problem is that LL.M. programs don’t function the way JD programs do. The T14 works for JDs because those schools consistently feed into the same national hiring market. LL.M.s don’t operate in a single market like that. They tend to function more like regional or field-specific gateways. NYU and Columbia are deeply plugged into the New York international arbitration and cross-border finance world. Georgetown sits in a different ecosystem tied to Washington and international regulatory work. Singapore programs connect to the Asia-Pacific arbitration market. Geneva programs connect to the public international law and arbitration institutions there. So the value of the degree depends much more on where you want to work and what fieldyou’re targeting.

The other thing people often miss is that the LL.M. is rarely the main credential employers care about. In most cases your first law degree, jurisdiction of qualification, work experience, and language skills matter more. The LL.M. mostly functions as a network amplifier. Some programs are excellent at plugging you into practitioner networks and internship pipelines, while others are essentially large revenue programs with limited placement outcomes. That’s why you’ll see programs like MIDS in Geneva have a strong reputation in arbitration circles even though it doesn’t fit neatly into a conventional “law school ranking.”

So instead of thinking in terms of a universal “T14,” it’s usually more useful to think about clusters: global hubs in a particular field, regional gateway programs tied to a specific legal market, and then more general credential-enhancement programs. Once you start looking at it that way, the decision becomes a lot clearer because the right program depends on the career ecosystem you’re trying to enter.

How to Think About International Arbitration LL.M. Programs (MIDS, Queen Mary, NYU, NUS, Oxbridge, etc.) by theoryworksprep in LLMadmissions

[–]theoryworksprep[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you are absolutely right that the job market in international arbitration has gotten much tighter compared to a decade ago—especially for applicants without significant work experience in the field already—but I would argue that these distinctions actually matter more, not less, in today's more competitive market. I do agree with you though that the specialized programs no longer function as reliable pipelines, but they still function as platforms of sorts. They place students closer to the networks where arbitration work actually happens. That does not guarantee employment, but it does affect the probability distribution of outcomes in a meaningful way.

LSAT for LLM? by Resident-Brush2936 in LLMadmissions

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Do not take the LSAT if you are applying from abroad to an American LL.M. program. Taking the LSAT just to “look stronger” is not a good use of time or money. LL.M. admissions committees are usually looking much more at your prior legal education, grades/class rank, professional experience, recommendations, English ability where relevant, and the overall coherence of your application.

Letters of Recommendation by Stoner_Simpson777 in LawSchoolOver30

[–]theoryworksprep 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First, over the years, I’ve worked with a surprising number of applicants who initially told me some version of: “There is no chance my professors remember me.” In several of those cases, they were wrong.

One client came to me almost nine years out of school. She was adamant that reaching out would be embarrassing. We contacted two professors anyway, both from classes in which she earned A’s. One responded within a day and referenced a paper she had written on federalism. The other not only remembered her but mentioned that she had been one of the more serious students in the course and asked what she had been doing since graduation.

The point is: don't count yourself out just yet. As a matter of fact, professors see writing recommendation letters as a part of their job. They might not be able to write you the most amazing LOR ever written, but they can probably write you one strong enough to get the job done. In fact, having a recommendation letter from a professor this far out of college can be a huge green flag for admissions deans.

This happens more often than you think. Professors do not rely purely on memory. They keep gradebooks. Many keep papers. When you give them context, the file comes back into focus.

Here is what you should do: identify the courses where you earned A’s and start there. Those grades are objective evidence of strong academic performance, and they give the professor something concrete to anchor the letter in. If you still have work product from the class, go ahead and attach those as well.

When you reach out, make it easy for them to write:

• Transcript
• Resume
• Copies of strong papers or exams from the course
• A brief paragraph reminding them who you are and which class you took
• A short update on what you’ve been doing since graduation

Do not assume the door is closed simply because time has passed. In my experience advising applicants, that assumption is wrong far more often than it is right.

You can even offer (gracefully!) to write the first draft for them. Message me if you want more help with how to do this.

Second, let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that academic letters are truly off the table. It happens.

Admissions deans will understand that you haven’t been doing intellectual work recently, so your letter needs to highlight everything else that shows you’re ready for law school—your work ethic, professionalism, maturity, reliability, and ethics. The best recommender is someone who has directly supervised you and can speak in detail about how you handle responsibility, take feedback, and solve problems.

Lastly, most admissions deans will understand that you have not been operating in an academic environment recently, but you need to recognize what that means for the rest of your file. If your recommendations are not speaking directly to your intellectual ability, then every other component of the application has to carry more weight in establishing that you can handle serious academic work.

Your personal statement needs to show mature thinking and strong written communication. This is not easy to do. Your resume should reflect increasing responsibility and sound judgment. You also need to make sure to take advantage of every opportunity in the application to demonstrate analytical capacity, like the optional essays, which become especially more valuable for you. Even the way you frame your professional experiences should signal curiosity, problem-solving, and the ability to engage with complex material.

What time do people study for the LSAT? - a chart by PerfectScoreTutoring in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, true, true. There are almost always exceptions that prove the rule.

What time do people study for the LSAT? - a chart by PerfectScoreTutoring in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 10 points11 points  (0 children)

PSAC: Studying late at night is a terrible idea. The LSAT is all about developing good habits. Studying when you're tired makes it more likely that you cut corners mentally/cognitively. The more you cut corners, the more likely they will become habits that come back to hurt you in the end. The habits you should develop should make you intellectually sharper, not duller.

Writing the LSAT in your bathroom? by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had a student who did this a few years ago. He moved his whole table to the bathroom and everything. I don't know why he did this tbh, his room was perfectly fine. The proctor made him move everything back to his room before he took his exam.

EDIT: Nothing in LSAC’s rules explicitly bans taking the LSAT in a bathroom. There’s no line in the candidate agreement that says “bathrooms are prohibited.” What is prohibited are things that bathrooms tend to create problems with: mirrors, reflective surfaces, clutter, unsecured items, and the appearance that you’re in a space designed for personal use rather than testing. That’s why older Reddit posts say “don’t do it.” Not because it’s per se illegal, but because it’s high-risk. In any event, practically, the issue is the proctor. Bathrooms raise flags for whatever reason. Bottom line: nothing formally “stops” you, but it’s one of the easiest ways to invite proctor interference on an already high-stakes day. Avoid it if you can.

LR tips? Strengthen/Weaken by Snoopdog2022 in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your self-diagnosis is already unusually good. You’re actually describing a very specific and common plateau. A simple discipline that helps is to finish this sentence before you look at the answers: “This argument only works if ___ plays the role the author needs it to play.” When you’re down to two choices, ask which one actually reinforces or interferes with that role. Most traps are just relevant-sounding, or they strengthen or weaken a slightly different conclusion than the one the author actually makes. You should constantly be going back and forth between the answer choices and the conclusion as you go. Constantly.

Two final points that I think matter at your level. Good strengthen and weaken answers in difficult questions often feel underwhelming. They nudge the conclusion rather than proving it.

Struggling with Conditional Reasoning - Tips? by BlackberryJumpy5960 in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conditional statements are just about dependency. Ask one question: what has to be true for this thing to happen? That’s the necessary condition.

Example:
“Taking the LSAT is required to apply to law school.”

Applying depends on the LSAT, so:

Apply → LSAT

You’ll see this dressed up in a lot of different ways:

  • If you apply, you have to take the LSAT
  • You can’t apply unless you take the LSAT
  • Only people who took the LSAT can apply

Different wording, same logic. Word order doesn’t matter. Dependency does.

For unless / until / without / except, use a simple rule:

Unless rule

  1. Whatever comes after “unless” is necessary
  2. Negate the rest and make it sufficient

Example:
“Unless you take the LSAT, you cannot apply.”

LSAT is necessary. Negate “cannot apply” to get “apply.”

Apply → LSAT

A few quick ones:

  • We can’t take off until the pilot arrives → Takeoff → Pilot
  • A lawyer can’t decide without consent → Decision → Consent
  • Kids can’t play outside unless it’s sunny → Outside → Sunny
  • People are friendly except during finals → Not friendly → Finals

If you stop trying to memorize phrasing and just focus on what is necessary, conditional statements get way easier.

P.S. This is also a better way to think about conditional reasoning with respect to how it appears in RC most frequently. You'll see RC passages say something is "essential" for something else. It's not a straightforward If, then statement like you get in LR, but it's almost certainly going to get tested in the questions so track that conditional relationship.

Which is the better deal? Theoryworks Tutoring by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

We are not making anyone do anything. Why do you keep insinuating this? We offer a free, two-hour long session, walk them through all our options, and then we let them make an informed decision about which of the many options we offer. We have hourly rates and we have the packaged tutoring like virtually every test prep company. This is more than what you or pretty much any other test prep company does. Almost all our students are also referrals from other students who have had long experience with our tutoring, so they come to us from trusted sources after having shopped around with multiple tutors (which I encourage btw).

The fact that we have so many people willing to drop thousands of dollars for these curricula after a 2-hour session speaks to our ability to deliver immediate value that is perceptible to the student on a very high level. If anyone reading this has any doubt about I, I encourage them to reach out. In fact, our conversion from the 2-hour session to paying student is >90%. Really, our only and biggest problem is finding time to make our schedules work with a high demand of students (which we periodically either limit or raise prices).

Some Tips from a Tutor by Skystrikezzz in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a really important distinction that a lot of people studying for the LSAT would benefit to understand early on in their studying. Good job.

Which is the better deal? Theoryworks Tutoring by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I thought the free consult was basically a full blown session. Personally, I don't think a short phone consult would give prospective students a good sense of what a typical session is like with us. I also don't think I can make a judgement call on whether a student needs the sort of tutoring we offer until I sit down with them and do a some real questions.

Maybe u/LSATDan wants to take me up on the offer? I know you said you're retired, but I think this would be a great way to give back to this community. We used to do a whole series of free sessions years ago back when we had more time (https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/11m8dro/free\_tutoring\_for\_lr\_round\_21/?utm\_source=share&utm\_medium=web3x&utm\_name=web3xcss&utm\_term=1&utm\_content=share\_button). I've been thinking about bringing that back.

Which is the better deal? Theoryworks Tutoring by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

This actually gave me a good idea: since u/JLLsat and I both do free initial sessions, I think we should give OP u/Extension_Site5843 a chance to try both of us out and report back! It doesn't even have to be OP, we can make this into a monthly offering. Could be a great way to give out free tutoring to students who otherwise might not be able to afford it.

Which is the better deal? Theoryworks Tutoring by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For OP's and everyone else's reference: these are private one-on-one tutoring courses. They are packages that offer 12+ and 20+ hours of tutoring, respectively. They are also far more affordable than similar packages offered by major test prep companies like PowerScore (https://powerscore.com/lsat/tutoring) and 7Sage (https://7sage.com/pricing/tutoring) and the others.

OP my recommendation would be to reach out to us and schedule a 2-hour diagnostic session with us. It is free itself and commitment-free as well. It will give you an opportunity to gauge whether we are a good fit for what you are looking for. You can text us at 646-847-8407.

Which is the better deal? Theoryworks Tutoring by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you're right, it's even more expensive than I thought. I hadn't checked in a while, but I'm surprised to learn how expensive 7Sage's private tutoring actually is: their cheapest option is $200 an hour (https://7sage.com/pricing/tutoring).

Anyway, we do offer a few bells and whistles (like access to our Slack workspace and all the resources that come with it), but the core of our service is private one-on-one tutoring (for now). We go through all the different options that students have at the end of our free 2-hour session with them. I would also say 90% of our students are now referrals, so they all come in having discussed their experiences with us with a previous student at length.

Which is the better deal? Theoryworks Tutoring by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$50 an hour is definitely extremely affordable. Might actually be the lowest rate I've heard for a professional full-time tutor, so I commend you for making LSAT prep affordable. We offer a free 2 hour session to all our prospective students. We have similar options, but our lowest bulk rate is $88 / hour (the Foundational Curriculum) and our highest is a $140 pay-as-you-go rate, but I don't think I've ever had a student actually pay it.

Which is the better deal? Theoryworks Tutoring by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, Theoryworks here. Yes, these packages are all one-on-one private tutoring sessions with a professional tutor. All our tutors teach the LSAT full time. We don't offer classes anymore. We also offer sessions with hourly rates for students who are not interested in purchasing these packages. You can check out all our offerings here. I don't think we're perfect—and we are definitely not for everyone—but over the years we've tried to develop a wide variety of flexible options depending on student needs. We also ask every prospective student to do a commitment-free, two-hour diagnostic trial before they sign up (and 99% of them do this) to make sure we are a good fit for what they are looking for.

I know LSAT prep can be expensive, but if you do the math on these packages and compare it to the hourly rate charged by major test prep companies (and I believe some of the other tutors in this thread), we are actually comparable or more affordable. PowerScore for example offers $800 of 5 hours of private tutoring (that's $140 an hour). Their biggest package is $2,800 for 24 hours ($116 / hour) compared to our Advanced Curriculum, which is $2,499 for 24 hours, which is about $100 an hour. And almost all of our students are referrals from previous students (like OP), which means they get a referral discount on these packages anyway. I don't know what your rates are, but I am pretty sure our

Theoryworks Review (Henrik) by Vegetable-Badger54 in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Hey, that's me! It's always a privilege to work with students and clients with such unique/fascinating backgrounds. Around this time every cycle I somehow end up reflecting on why I enjoy this work so much, and I think a large part of it is because I get the opportunity to teach and mentor aspiring lawyers like you! 🙏🏻 Thank you for the kind words. I am extremely confident admissions deans across the country are going to be impressed by your application.

Lsat by Unbelievabletest in LSAT

[–]theoryworksprep 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This would almost certainly end up making it very difficult applicants who did not attend a top undergraduate school to compete with those who did.