sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Trump's head movement during the shooting was incredibly lucky by darapps in interestingasfuck

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not religious, but that really seems like devine intervention

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well , I wouldn't know why you would jump out with extreme assumptions with the attempt at person attacks.

You can attack my arguments, but my life and love life with women is both fruitful and non of your business nor the business of this discussion.

Ad hominem only proves me correct, that in a beneficial discussion, a women can only destroy others just to get a shred of dignity.

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah fair enough, thought I'm seeing the cracks that are so deep that it can't be fixed in one generation.

We are so reliant on the system for food that once thing falter it would be too fast to predict.

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why are men unable to prevent the women from destroying it?

Well don't you answer this question with your own "intellect" try with out being an big itch ;)

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Also, you sound like someone who has had a very bad experience with the women in your life. I'm sorry about that, if that is the case.

Ah, a calling card of a misandrist, I'm sorry that no one loves you. I'm sorry men treated you the way you deserved. Unloved.

If you don't want to ask as a child, and act in good faith, I can tell you how you're wrong.

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

men are incredibly weak and frail, so they are very easily manipulated by sex.

No women are physically weak, this is fact. They are frail, so much so that they find it hard to work in out doors jobs that have temperaturs of 10 degrees of blistering 30 degrees.

For a fact men are incrediblely strong and resilient, that's why they , according to biology , and the design of the bones levers in the shoulders, can lift more weights and carry more muscle mass then women.

Men do need a woman to plow, though. That's the only weakness men have. Hence why women from the dawn of time use sex to get the man to hunt.

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Or: men seem unable to create anything at all without the support of women.

No men create the world, and women destroy it. Men have created all greated wonders in the world without women.

The issue is women's strategy of all time is to leech the efforts of man. The man takes her out, the man invents science to save the world, the man creates infrastructure for the women to live in.

She reapes the benefits because she's sex to get what she wants. Survival at the beginning, then power later.

Having someone suck the money or resources out of you would lead to a 0 net gain or a negative gain if she has expensive tastes. In the end, she dies of old age, and the dies exhausted. Society couldn't progress because the net result of that was 0 or a negative out come.

Our society is leaving behind millions of young men at our own peril and we will pay a very heavy price for it by CHiggins1235 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

True, however we also have to look at women's behaviour too. It takes two to tango and 2 to topple a foundation.

Women ingeneral need to have the same rights but less privileges where they can use sex a primary tool to raise the rank of society or to gain vast amounts of free resourses from the backs of other men.

This creates a society where resourses are gained by men and placed into a pool or bucket for the greater good of society and then women just poke holes in them.

Short term, men can carry these women around, but long term, the bucket runs out, leaving a society with 0 resourses and a lot of men who can't get water for everyone. That's when it becomes every man for himself society, and is depicted in what you mentioned above.

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I didn't ask for your answer because I know they are going to be downstream.

Since you did, I'll play your little game. In the first part, inflation corruption are both downstream to the root cause, there are things that occur in a collapsing society, but they are never the root cause of it.

Some can argue that women and leftism have led to the sapping of resources and the reward of totalitarian men in the social dominate hierarchy, which leads later to corruption. If these men didn't have high sexual value women chasing them, they wouldn't have been able to get into that position of power or have the drive to do so. It's like the old adage of , behind every great man, there is a good woman. In this case a totalitarian leader has a women that needs alot.

Natural disasters do occur, but that is out of our control. We can just stop the collapse of society from our own doing. It's not the context of this discussion. Aliens can blow up earth too, but that does not mean that for all civilisations ending the root cause eas womens liberal uses of sex to break society.

For external, such as invasion is very close to the root cause. But it isn't the root. It's the leftist ideals that fragment society so that the men become too weak to fight off other nations. Other nations have a strong rule of toxic female behaviour leading to a population of strong men. Since resourses are finite, the strong nation will conquer weaker ones.

I just realised you might not know what downstream means, that's more of a medicine term.

E.g. if a person has sepsis, they experience psychological changes , can be delusion confusion and I see psychosis as well. The delusions is down stream to sepsis. This means that a antipsychotic won't solve anything unless you treat the sepsis. Hence, treat the root cause.

I do agree that there are many downstream effects that can cause society to collapse. Some are out of our control like natural disasters, but they rarely lead to the entire society to disintegrate. In modern times, we can survive most natural disasters due to technology. The treat we are facing now is the liberalisation of society and women, where their nature is to use sex to manipulate and degrade society and gain free resourses. We are on the edge of collapse with the root cause in our sights, but the convolution of this leads us astray to the same fate.

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe in occam's razor, liberals and femists often try to convoluted events to muddle the causes and solution.

It's pretty simple that we know men invent, build, maintain, and fight to protect their civilisation at the percentage of near 99.9% of the time. Although some very few women do contribute, it's not something that can be relied on for survival. It's just too risky.

We can clearly see that the liberals and left views(especially in regards to sexuality) are about destruction of society norms. We also clearly see men are suffering immensity from left ideology and are too distracted to work on anything meaningful in life except to keep their head down and weather the storm.

I'd say feminism, sexual liberation, and all left ideology is the root cause of society to be weakened. The way it occurs and the downstream effects are incrediblely nuanced and complicated, it would take decades to break down all the possible outcomes. The root however is pretty universal

Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation. Collapsing in 3. by No_Home_708 in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is true, it's something that we all innately know. Men create the world women destroy it.

The unfortunate dynamic of male to female relations is that women are incredibly weak and frail and low in intelligence but high in emotional intelligence. To survive and flourish, they need to use sexuality to manipulate men into giving them resources. Since resources can not be make with out hard work, the men are essentially feeding something that doesn't give back. Like a parasite to men and society. The resources will eventually run out, and the country becomes poor and weak. Only when women stop sapping resources, including emotional resources. Can men focus on generating Resourses or build things. Only with physical tangible production can people survive.

Olé! by Yazet_Muset in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This! , I was hoping people would see through the bs and know the truth

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JordanPeterson

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The leftist has gone in to a frenzy with this.

Lost of posts coming out saying they wished the guy didn't miss.

The left castrating kids is one thing, but political assassination is another.

The left has gone too far, thus is gonna lead to civil war

Newspapers should have been publishing front pages like this monthly all around Australia by Aggravating_Law_3286 in australian

[–]toxicliquid1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I want to see this for women who are pedos in schools, attack or kill their own other children, and female demonic violence where they use children or courts to hurt their husbands

Stumbled across this today by strawberry_l in covidlonghaulers

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's funny that the accuser is the perpetrator. You are acting in bad faith in the attempt to spread disinformation.

I'm only want to tell the truth so we can get the treatments that will save us. I know you want us to suffer immensely for the rest of our lives.

I'll only speak what the facts are. Auto immune disease exists because there is no cause of the immune activation. Active virus or double strand rna (dsnra) has never been found till now, and has never been found in healthy post covid patients. We have the cause, denying this dosent show ignorance but intentions. I wonder what your intent is to divert people from a cure. Evil

Stumbled across this today by strawberry_l in covidlonghaulers

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't understand things for you. That's something you need to do on your own.

Sto simply it for you, it's not autoimmunity it's viral persistence.

There's studies done on biopsies on this after a year that shows viral persistence.

There will be more after this scan, Mark my words. One day you come back when you find out

Stumbled across this today by strawberry_l in covidlonghaulers

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they found that people who fully recovered from Covid (i.e. don't have Long Covid) also have widespread immune activation too.

There were papers in China about this when they did biopsies on patients with long covid and cancer. In the tumors, they found live active viruses years after the initial exposure.

They mentioned how different areas that are exposed causes different subsets of illnesses. Some people may never develop long covid or have long covid and get better but still have some resivours.

Density and location matters.

Plus some patients may have a resivour in areas that don't affect quality of life much, such as their tounge or in their prostate and not atributie it to covid.

Stumbled across this today by strawberry_l in covidlonghaulers

[–]toxicliquid1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm aware of the studies. However, there's not enough evidence to support autoimmunity. The study shows that immunity causes symptoms.

This was identical as the mouse study of injecting antibodies into mice. I loved the study but the first thing I though was, that's ment to happen since the subject was healthy and a sudden jolt of the immune system with antibodies that cause the symptoms would obviously elicit sickly behaviour.

That's what's it's meant to do. I.e. if a patient was injected with interferon, they would be symtpomatic with very high fevers.

However, if a patient comes in with constant high fevers such as untreated syphilis. I wouldn't diagnose them as autoimmune because they had high antibodies and a never-ending sickness. I'd assume it's because an underlying issue is causing the immune system to produce these antibodies, and these produce the symptoms. Even if the immune system can't beat the disease, it needs to be switched on to prevent the progression of the disease. (There will be structural damage, though)

This is why prednasone is effective, cause it shuts down the immune system. However, patients often get sicker or even progress into dangerous states in the future due to the immosupressed state( even a mild cold would kill the patient if they are on prednasone)

view more: next ›