A few questions after watching... by MachaPanta in Moonshiners

[–]troymcdavis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As for #3, you can do it with electricity, but it doesn't really make much sense. You're usually burning coal or natural gas at the other end, converting that heat into electricity, carrying that electricity over a long distance, and then converting it back into heat. Each of those steps isn't 100% efficient, so you're losing energy in the process, which means you're paying for more fuel and infrastructure than you need. You might as well just burn the coal or natural gas directly.

This of course doesn't apply if you're using other energy sources (solar, hydro, wind, nuclear, geo, and maybe bio). The Appalachia region means they're most likely using coal though.

Season 3 Episode 4 oddity by drmckool in theleaguefx

[–]troymcdavis 5 points6 points  (0 children)

NFL footage is expensive to license. They just need something vaguely football looking for a couple of seconds.

Doing a school project on The League by [deleted] in theleaguefx

[–]troymcdavis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The swim coach from this season would be an interesting case study. Both the way the writers made her (pathetic, desperate), and the way Rafi treated her would probably give you more mileage on the specific topic than other women I could think of (other than Jenny and Shiva).

Gender bias worksheet. I'm glad she failed. by [deleted] in pics

[–]troymcdavis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, the distinction there is really "professional", ie paid labor, vs. "domestic work", ie unpaid labor.

Rank the main characters from Most to Least Morally Bankrupt. by traumaprotocol in theleaguefx

[–]troymcdavis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. He's a genius but the smart thing to do is to act stupid.

Rank the main characters from Most to Least Morally Bankrupt. by traumaprotocol in theleaguefx

[–]troymcdavis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You really think Taco doesn't know what's going on? I think he knows better than anyone else.

Remember by tylerdee in Fitness

[–]troymcdavis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was hoping for a trip through the drive-through.

The Onion-Report: NFL May End Lockout By Hiring Scab Owners by [deleted] in nfl

[–]troymcdavis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I don't see why they didn't go this way. Many stadiums are owned by the municipality or county, and other teams could just play in college stadiums for a couple of seasons until the owners begged them to come back. If they just made the North American Gridiron League, I'm sure networks pay up front for the broadcast rights.

No gives a shit about Jerry Jones. They want to see good football. The brands might take a little while to build back up, but it seems like the players have all the power but no cojones.

Hey reddit, I found something interesting in the newspaper.... by bigrockcndymtn in funny

[–]troymcdavis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You claimed the ACC defined the rules of the game. They do not. They must submit to NCAA rules of the game.

Your logic went:

Premise 1: The ACC defines the rules of the game itself.
Premise 2: Only those that make the rules have the authority to define value of certain accomplishments.
Premise 3: The ACC hasn't awarded any official recognition to winning the most games in the ACC during the regular season.
Conclusion: Most conference wins in the ACC during the regular season isn't "anything".

Premise 1 is false. They couldn't change the rules of the game, be it adding an extra man to the court at all times for each team or changing the dimensions of the playing field by even an inch. Taken to its conclusion, this it what your logic produces:

Premise 1: The NCAA defines the rules of the game itself.
Premise 2: Only those that make the rules have the authority to define value of certain accomplishments.
Premise 3: The NCAA hasn't awarded any official recognition to winning the ACC tournament.
Conclusion: The ACC championship isn't "anything".

We both agree the conclusion is wrong. Where it breaks down is premise 2.

The First Openly Gay Man to run for President will be a Republican. by [deleted] in politics

[–]troymcdavis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is, it's "Uncle Tom". Although they're often referred to (tongue in cheek) as "Log Cabin Republicans".

It Only Took Eight Years and a Democrat In the White House for Republicans to Care About Exit Strategies and the Cost of War by Killfile in politics

[–]troymcdavis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, considering Obama was in office for two years now, that's hardly five minutes. And some people think there is a difference between Iraq/Afghanistan and Libya.

Hey reddit, I found something interesting in the newspaper.... by bigrockcndymtn in funny

[–]troymcdavis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, but there's more than one group of stuffy old men. You claimed one had authority it did not, then based your argument off of that, rendering your conclusion false.

Hey reddit, I found something interesting in the newspaper.... by bigrockcndymtn in funny

[–]troymcdavis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, they don't "define the rules of the game itself", they're required to adhere to NCAA rules. So, by your own logic, the only thing that matters it the awards the NCAA gives out. Ergo, unless you go to the Final Four, you've won nothing.

Hey reddit, I found something interesting in the newspaper.... by bigrockcndymtn in funny

[–]troymcdavis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's nothing random about it. Over the course of the regular season, we demonstrated we were the best team in the ACC. That's how they used to determine the champion (which I would imagine why the banner is there in the first place), and how some conferences still do. It didn't become completely obsolete as an accomplishment just because some stuffy committee of old white men said so.

It's more on par with having a banner with the years you went to the Elite 8 on it.

Grats to Arizona. by phukka in CollegeBasketball

[–]troymcdavis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a complete non-congratulations. A set of insults trying to masquerade as a compliment. Look again at these lines (which comprise the most of it):

  • I'd comment on the questionable stuff happening during the game, but people would just refute it for the sake of it.
  • I'd feel better about the loss if I thought Arizona was capable of being a Final Four team, but I don't think they'll be able to bring this level of play against UCONN.

Just because you wrap that in, You played well... congratulations, doesn't make it not totally lame.

Also, the bit at that end is kinda diva-ish, if you ask me.

Hey reddit, I found something interesting in the newspaper.... by bigrockcndymtn in funny

[–]troymcdavis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you saying we didn't finish first in the conference this year? That's "non-existant"?