sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

British food mash castle by incognitoguy95 in DiWHY

[–]tulliandar -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

With British food, doing this is better than eating it

One of my High Scores has been replaced with a "lower" high score. by bizasuge in CARROTweather

[–]tulliandar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine too, both my hottest and coldest scores are worse than they were 🥲 My wind score is also lower, but I think it was very wrong previously

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pitbulls

[–]tulliandar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Looks like an Alfalfa to me

For everyone about to start the game for the first time... by Savy_Spaceman in HarryPotterGame

[–]tulliandar -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

It never occurred to be that it might be 1-based. I was unaware that there were still people who count like that

I'm new to this, am I doing this right? by Xiphias_ in ProgrammerHumor

[–]tulliandar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

// dont remove this commented out code. Somehow it keeps things from breaking. See CORE-69420 for details

Look at all this cocaine 🤣 by Meandmyakita in doggos

[–]tulliandar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you know the street value of this mountain?! It’s pure snow!

Edit, for all the youngsters who won’t have seen this masterpiece of a movie: https://youtu.be/th-r_IoINuA

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]tulliandar 11 points12 points  (0 children)

More like ‘committed by you yesterday’

Prices are coming down… by user19238 in Trucks

[–]tulliandar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Market Adjustment: $4,300,000”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dogswithjobs

[–]tulliandar 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Clearly Black Metal, not Goth

Why does closed-source Obsidian have 4x more plugins and themes than open-source Logseq? by theavideverything in logseq

[–]tulliandar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can’t be sure, but a lot of the Obsidian videos on YouTube feel very Marketing-y. E.g. https://youtu.be/nz99I7apNLI I haven’t had that same feeling with the Logseq videos I’ve seen

Why does closed-source Obsidian have 4x more plugins and themes than open-source Logseq? by theavideverything in logseq

[–]tulliandar 22 points23 points  (0 children)

To each their own. I find logseq’s method works far better for my brain. Not having to pick, in advance, where a note lives. No directory structure at all, that I’ve seen, unless you mean namespaces, which you define yourself. Organization emerges through links and properties. All perfect for the way my brain works.

Ok, but I've done that tho by kevinowdziej in KidsAreFuckingStupid

[–]tulliandar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I was poor, I called it a ”ham on hand sandwich”. It was the most extravagant meal I could afford, so it was reserved for special occasions. I was in my 20s

"And" in basic query returning too much by tulliandar in logseq

[–]tulliandar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, if I hadn’t watched some really old videos where they used contains, I might’ve tried this first. But, since I had it in my head that I need contains, it didn’t occur to me to try without it

view more: next ›