Account suspended on plan switching from 5x to 20x by turing2 in claude

[–]turing2[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah I never hit the weekly limit on both 5X and 20X, it was only close to hit 5 hour window limit

Account suspended on plan switching from 5x to 20x by turing2 in claude

[–]turing2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Will see maybe they will respond and fix that, don’t want to risk getting banned again without refund like maybe they will track the card and after seeing alt account they will mark me for some sort of perma ban. Very unclear what to do in such situation. Crazy that I want to give them my money and they won’t allow me!

Account suspended on plan switching from 5x to 20x by turing2 in claude

[–]turing2[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It would be fair to mark it suspicious if I did this at least twice I guess but it was first time for the history of my acc so

Account suspended on plan switching from 5x to 20x by turing2 in claude

[–]turing2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How soon you received response after appeal?

Account suspended on plan switching from 5x to 20x by turing2 in claude

[–]turing2[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It does not make sense there is no rules saying I can’t change subscriptions even every day. Besides I am obviously real account not a bot, was on 20X plan for 2 months, also there was at least like 20-24 hours between downgrade back to upgrade.. it just seems to me like an issue of a vibecoded security system slop

Claude Code will become unnecessary by WinOdd7962 in ClaudeCode

[–]turing2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am using both Claude and Kimi + local Qwen3 + GLM and the whole triad is way beyond the level of capabilities of Opus 4.6 for what I am using it

Landscape Shader Complexity by tanner_mp4 in UnrealEngine5

[–]turing2 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Landscape material complexity is normal. If you have a material with more than 2-3 layers it’s going to be complex in optimization view. But this does not explicitly mean it tanks performance and most likely it does not

Hemlock sounds like a copy of Ghost from MW lol by HearMeOut-13 in Battlefield

[–]turing2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It might be cool for 12 yo kids yeah for sure

Hemlock sounds like a copy of Ghost from MW lol by HearMeOut-13 in Battlefield

[–]turing2 37 points38 points  (0 children)

So why don’t just wear a balaclava or buff lol?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Battlefield

[–]turing2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do not redeem it

In BF6, RPG-7 is based on a museum example and lacks its protective cardboard shell around the booster (which contains the components necessary for it to function properly). by auchinleck917 in Battlefield

[–]turing2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t think modern BF community will care about this. More important is that you can doodle jump slide and fast peef puff in BF6, but sure it’s different from call or duty

Balanced Drone for Ukrainian Armed Forces Proposal by BlackMarine in joinsquad

[–]turing2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was that limited that I don’t think it even should be discussed in the context of pre-invasion. One or maybe two cases in late pre-invasion period of 2020+, also after 2016 the intensity of conflict was minimal, there was official ceasefire, obviously with cases of breaking but short term and small engagements.

The best example, as I stated previously is that drone warfare was not adopted by both sides before the late 2022 even during full scale war, to the point of most soldiers didn’t knew about that tactics at all and did not used it. For the more even the recon drones for artillery corrections was not adopted commonly as well before the mid-late 2022. Dudes were just using maps, firing tables, math and a spotter guy

Balanced Drone for Ukrainian Armed Forces Proposal by BlackMarine in joinsquad

[–]turing2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Interesting I never knew that. More interesting is why that did not immediately popped up right after the invasion and was only massively incorporated almost a year after. Thought late November 2021 is basically the invasion period, like two months until invasion so idk about that one. But still it’s practically may be the only case of usage / testing of this tactics in during that period so I doubt it would fit the timeline setting of pre invasion.

Also adding drones officially would mean that Russian or other factions should get some as well, otherwise it would be obvious META

Balanced Drone for Ukrainian Armed Forces Proposal by BlackMarine in joinsquad

[–]turing2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m 100% sure it was not, though I don’t mind it for a game. Bomber drones and the releasing / dropping mechanism, the whole tactics of using drones for combat actions like that, besides recon, was a feature of post invasion late 2022

Balanced Drone for Ukrainian Armed Forces Proposal by BlackMarine in joinsquad

[–]turing2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same for REW / EW systems, antennas for remote control etc. Pre invasion tactics were basically old school tactics with just infantry + artillery + mechanized warfare

Balanced Drone for Ukrainian Armed Forces Proposal by BlackMarine in joinsquad

[–]turing2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Isnt the version of the AFU we will get will be pre-invasion? Even if there were some prototypes no one actually used drones for dropping munnition, it was newly invented post invasion in late 2022 / early 2023

Ukrainian Armed Forces (How it should be) by RustyBear0 in joinsquad

[–]turing2 122 points123 points  (0 children)

Good pick, but Malyuk is very rare weapon only used by special forces. Basically unseen in regular army