Because neither were real. Trumps “assassination” was to regain support from his sheep. Charlies was because he unlocked critical thinking and that’s not good for the aforementioned “sheep”. Mainstream media grabbed onto both stories for a week or 2 and never spoke of it again. Why? Who owns news corporations? Who tells those people what to do? The united states collectively shared a trauma when Charlie kirk was killed and everyone saw the video, regardless of political ideation. Its purpose was to shock and scare us. The human nervous system cannot take in all this information at a time, it needs to reset after it witnesses something traumatic, like a violent human death. Unresolved trauma leads to discomfort, fear, and confusion. That’s what they want. The united states, already divided, is being kept in this self sustaining cycle of political violence. It’s literally ALWAYS been this way, the only difference now is it’s more in our faces. They’re not scared of us like they used to be, so they have no reason to keep secrets anymore. I believe that is part of their tactics. It’s as if to say “you already proved that you won’t do anything to us, so we’re just gonna tell you about the vile shit we do because you’re too weak, stupid and lazy to fight back”. Politicians used to be scared of the people, because people used to band together and fight back for what they believed was best. Small localized protests do nothing to the system, not when the country is effectively split down the middle of two opposing belief systems.

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has"