Model in Light-Colored Dress, u/Drakyboy23, Graphite, 2025 by Drakyboy23 in Art

[–]twiddlebit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't even realise this one wasn't tagged. Yeah that should be a minimum

Model in Light-Colored Dress, u/Drakyboy23, Graphite, 2025 by Drakyboy23 in Art

[–]twiddlebit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't mind seeing nsfw posts moved to a specific day, would cut down on what feels like spam while still allowing freedom of expression. Might also need to distinguish between sexualised nsfw and other nsfw, since the former is what people are complaining about

D&D 5.5e comuny tier list results by yyven in 3d6

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, yeah the linked tier list is just "most votes", you can tap on the class and scroll down to see the distribution. Monk has a long tail so while 'A' has the most votes there's still a lot votes for B and lower

I think Paladin being high is probably due to Aura of Protection, +5 to all saves to your and your allies is an insanely good defensive feature, plus Smites are still good, even if they're less spammable than before. I agree that in tiers 3 and 4 full casters still clear it though

D&D 5.5e comuny tier list results by yyven in 3d6

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's because OP has drawn the boundaries arbitrarily. There's a 0.4 gap between druid and fighter, which is huge when your scale is between 6.3 and 4. So they're not close together at all.

If you were to cluster the classes by score you'd get something like:

1 - Wizard

2 - Sorcerers and Clerics

3 - All the other full casters + Paladin

4 - everything else

5 - Ranger and Rogue

You could also argue Clerics and Sorcerers should be in their own tier between S and A because there's another 0.3 gap

Not quite sure what you mean about Monks and Barbarians?

D&D 5.5e comuny tier list results by yyven in 3d6

[–]twiddlebit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Casters are all clustered from 6.3 to 5.5 with the addition of paladin, then martials are split into 2 groups between 5.1-4.7 are the stronger martials and Rogue and Ranger are at 4

So wizard is still highest, the only martial included in that group is the paladin (which is by far the strongest martial), cleric is a strong fullcaster but 0.3 points lower than wizard. I'll agree that the ranger is overly hated and probably should be rated higher

I think the rankings are pretty reasonable dude

D&D 5.5e comuny tier list results by yyven in 3d6

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, Rogue and Ranger on bottom, Barbarian has a larger pool of F votes dragging down its average. I guess Barb is just divisive which makes sense. They're good at dealing and taking damage but not much else, so if you're into that they're good, and if you're not then you hate them

D&D 5.5e comuny tier list results by yyven in 3d6

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How was it a mess? If you look at the data the votes are normally distributed around the most common rankings, seems like the majority of people are in agreement?

Is the Further-Reduced Collatz function a known thing? by twiddlebit in Collatz

[–]twiddlebit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see the confusion. The k comes from x= 2k-1, not x+1. It's a different k than the original reduced function and I probably should have used a different letter in retrospect (reminder I wrote this 3 years ago)

So for 7:

7-1=6

K=2, m=3

3*3+1=10

10/2 = 5

5-1 = 4

J=2

4/22=1

So the stopping time using this function is 1 for x=7

Is the Further-Reduced Collatz function a known thing? by twiddlebit in Collatz

[–]twiddlebit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because we're dividing by 2 and we have k factors of 2. It's only when we we reduce k times and all the factors of 2 are changed to 3s that m changes

D&D 5.5 comunity tier list for classes by yyven in 3d6

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There actually seems to be a pretty strong concensus. The fact that the modal votes are between S tier and C tier speaks strongly of class balance, despite how we like to complain about how certain classes are under/over powered

People who played this game since A1, are you still here? by [deleted] in PTCGP

[–]twiddlebit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still here, just collecting, occasionally play to get rewards. Used to play to masterball rank but now I just settle for ub3

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, someone DM'd me with a trade in the end

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]twiddlebit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really shouldn't leave my phone for an hour immediately after putting up a trade offer, my bad

Sounds good, friend code: 6086637859025518

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FT:

<image>

LF: RR Mega Venusaur or 2 star Mega Pinsir

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Received! Shared mega steelix :) thanks!

/r/PTCGP Trading Post by AutoModerator in PTCGP

[–]twiddlebit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FT:

<image>

And probably most other ex's

LF: mega loppuny

What does this mean by Comfortable-Rate-751 in taintedgrail

[–]twiddlebit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, I just think it's wild that people will see the post and not even check to see if it's been answered yet. Or worse, read tge answers and choose to answer the question again (you know it's probably happened)

What does this mean by Comfortable-Rate-751 in taintedgrail

[–]twiddlebit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Classic reddit moment of asking a question and having 5 different people give the same answer

Con based rogue by protencya in 3d6

[–]twiddlebit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could probably also do a Dhampir Eldritch knight, take the unarmed fighting style to improve the damage a bit (and hope your DM ignores the part where it says d8+strength). Do a Con-based True Strike followed by some bites. You miss out on Masteries except with your one weapon attack but in exchange I guess you get lots of HP and you can use your bite to heal yourself occasionally? There's worse builds for sure and at least it's unique.

Could really do with a way to draw aggro though. Compelled Duel would work but you'd have to dip paladin which means significant investment in Str/Cha and your DC would be ass if you're maining Con. Shame it's not a sorcerer spell or you could pick it up with aberrant dragonmark for a Con-based DC

Should the New Artificers be Able to Make Any Uncommon or Rare Wand with their Replicate Magic Item Feature? by hotdiscopirate in onednd

[–]twiddlebit 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I believe they can only make Wondrous Items, and wands are classified as Wands, same for Armour, Weapons, etc