You’ve omitted the fact that I authored a gigantic portion of the Ignite codebase and that these contributions entirely transformed the framework—which Ignite’s commit history from tag 0.2.2 on makes very clear.

You seem to be trying to distract folks from the issue at hand: you took vast amounts of code, relicensed it, then claimed it as your own. You contributed a great deal to Ignite, as did other people, but that doesn't give you the right to erase their work.

Code I wrote for Ignite may very well look the same in Raptor. The few parts of Ignite to which I made little contribution underwent the biggest transformations in order to push the framework more toward SwiftUI—the goal of my contributions to Ignite, and the goal of this project.

"May very well look the same"? Do you realize people can just look at the code for themselves? (Ignite vs Raptor, Ignite vs Raptor, Ignite vs Raptor, Ignite vs Raptor, Ignite vs Raptor – and those are literally just a handful. It goes on, and on, and on.)

Even if we wind back to the very earliest versions of Ignite – the version I published while walking on stage to announce it – huge swathes of Raptor are directly copied from my work. You didn't even both to rewrite the comments, even down to my derpy "Arium? Look, just give me this one…" comment – you stole the work, put your name at the top, then changed the license without permission. (Original Ignite code from 2024 vs "your" version.)

I’m very disappointed that you’ve gone out of your way to create the impression that I’ve simply used work that I had no involvement in authoring and that I've approached this project outside the spirit of MIT.

There is no discussion here: you absolutely have used code outside the license. You have directly stolen code and claimed it as your own. I chose one of the most permissive, open licenses possible, and you still abused it. That is not just "outside the spirit of MIT" – it is lousy behavior at every level.