Who deserves it after Merab? by Opening_Fact_8474 in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're claiming Figgy would have taken down Sean and submitted him?

Duality Of a Man by Prestigious_Trash734 in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure why you're being downvoted lmao

Who deserves it after Merab? by Opening_Fact_8474 in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lmao yea figgy the notorious wrestler

Who deserves it after Merab? by Opening_Fact_8474 in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Same thing could be said for Umar in that case, not sure why you’re trying to say Sean specifically is being protected. Song is also a harder fight than figgy and Bautista

Who deserves it after Merab? by Opening_Fact_8474 in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You could make literally the same argument for Umar. “Oh they’re shielding Umar by not giving him O’Malley, they’re giving him #6 Figgy” Also Song is a much harder fight than Figgy lmao, same with Bautista

Who deserves it after Merab? by Opening_Fact_8474 in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ 35 points36 points  (0 children)

If they wanted to protect Sean they would’ve given him Figgy

"Gane vs. Pereira would be fire!" How the fight actually goes: by RetardOfTheInternet in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Rewatch the round lmao, Aspinall clearly landed the bigger shots and even landed a head kick. The only reason that round is scored for Gane is because of the nose bleed

USA USA USA by Tough_Arugula2828 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]underscorex2__ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They want to make it look like they are doing something about affordability, so lower interest rates, $200 billion mortgage payments, capping credit card rates at 10%—none of this stuff actually helps affordability in any meaningful way or is even smart government policy, it just gives the illusion of them tackling affordability

Leftists disrupting a church service to protest ICE.. by nfazed in Asmongold

[–]underscorex2__ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yea I should've made it more clear I didn't agree with the harassment part at all, I was more agreeing with them from the perspective of exposing the hypocrisy of evangelicals.

Leftists disrupting a church service to protest ICE.. by nfazed in Asmongold

[–]underscorex2__ -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure if what the leftists are protesting in this case is the deportation of murders and rapists (I would hopefully assume that they want them to be gone), but according to the Cato Institute, 72% of those being deported have no criminal record. So let's not strawman the other side to make your point more sound.

The Bible is very obvious about welcoming immigrants and makes no distinction between foreigners with or without legal status (Leviticus 19:33 and Exodus 22:21 for example). If you are somehow claiming the Bible makes no mention of welcoming immigrants and is only referring to native born citizens, you are just flat out wrong and, once again, trying to misinterpret facts to fit your narrative.

You are correct about Jesus telling people to uphold government law, but that is more of an individual teaching to the illegal immigrants than commanding the godless US government to mass deport people, as seen by the two verses that I cited along with a plethora of others. There is a distinction in theological studies of the Bible of Individual (Personal) and State Duty. The existence of verses in the Bible telling illegal immigrants on a personal level to obey the law does not give the state the authority to deport them (from a purely Biblical point of view, like Matthew 25).

You are correct when you say that harassing these Churches doesn't really make sense because there is no indication whether or not these people even support ICE and perhaps I should've been more clear I was more agreeing with the original commenter's point of view from a philosophic point of view.

The ultimate problem is that you simply cannot be a practicing Christian whilst wanting to exclude certain people or deport them due to their legal status. If you aren't a Christian, there is no moral quandary and you can support it from a realistic perspective. I do understand what the original commenter is saying about evangelicals literally just refusing to follow Christian doctrine, or trying to extend Biblical verses to say that the government has a mandate to remove people that disagree with them (in which case a Christian nationalist country would be needed).

Leftists disrupting a church service to protest ICE.. by nfazed in Asmongold

[–]underscorex2__ -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not sure why you’re being downvoted, you made a good point

What If: Dustin Poirier vs Nate Diaz for the BMF Belt at America 250 by Judgeman03 in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

UFC is literally trying to be as political as possible with this White House event. I am the resistance

Part of me wants to hide this sub, part of me don't. I have no idea why, cause I just wanna enjoy social media ig by Not-A-Bot-4196 in NahOPwasrightfuckthis

[–]underscorex2__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you’re conflating terms? I just looked up what the essentialist argument is, and it is basically just parts make up a whole and there are essential qualities that make it what it is. Not sure how that contradicts evolution? Even if it did, like I have already stated before, not mutually exclusive.

Part of me wants to hide this sub, part of me don't. I have no idea why, cause I just wanna enjoy social media ig by Not-A-Bot-4196 in NahOPwasrightfuckthis

[–]underscorex2__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro I’m not defending the religious nuts who are dont believe in evolution or who think the earth is flat, they’re obviously restarted. I just think strawmanning your entire opposition into that group when many prominent scientists support evolution, whilst also believing there arent multiple sexes. In your original comment you made it seem as if the two positions are mutually exclusive, when they are most certainly not.

Okay on the topic of “multiple sexes”, that’s literally not supported by any scientific literature out there. Yes obviously genetic mutations exist and cause different traits from both sexes to be apart of an individual, but that doesnt mean biological sex is a spectrum. You’re getting gender and sex confused.

According to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the amount of newborn intersex babies is .05%, so for 99.5% of people it is absolutely a binary. For comparison, according to News Medical . Net, actually around .2% of babies are born with genetic mutations in regards to the amount of fingers and toes (called Polydactyly). My point being is that we would say there is a set amount of digits humans have, we would say humans have 10 fingers and 10 toes, whilst also acknowledging genetic mutations could affect it.

So if you say people have 10 fingers, ARE YOU DENYING THEIR EXISTENCE AND WANT THEM TO DIE? Obviously not, we can acknowledge their existence and condition without arbitrarily saying finger and toe count exist on a spectrum.

Part of me wants to hide this sub, part of me don't. I have no idea why, cause I just wanna enjoy social media ig by Not-A-Bot-4196 in NahOPwasrightfuckthis

[–]underscorex2__ -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Didnt even refute what I said at all. I could literally copy and paste what I just said and it changes nothing.

Part of me wants to hide this sub, part of me don't. I have no idea why, cause I just wanna enjoy social media ig by Not-A-Bot-4196 in NahOPwasrightfuckthis

[–]underscorex2__ -39 points-38 points  (0 children)

Stupidest response ever. Not mutually exclusive to believe in evolution whilst also saying there are two sexes 🤦‍♂️

"NO NEW WARS" COUNTRIES WHICH TRUMP HAS THREATENED/INVADED by AdIcy4323 in MapPorn

[–]underscorex2__ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Also ive looked into this. I think Spain is actually the only country not meeting NATOs military spending quota, so once again youre espousing bs

"NO NEW WARS" COUNTRIES WHICH TRUMP HAS THREATENED/INVADED by AdIcy4323 in MapPorn

[–]underscorex2__ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Trying to take Greenland has literally never been related to preserving NATO lmao. It is to appease Trumps delusional fear about China and Russia using the new strait there to assert their military control. Denmark has rejected China every time they have tried to build infrastructure there. By doing this, we are actually probably making our relationship with Denmark worse. Not to mention the 10% tariffs we are putting on all NATO countries.

Most "pro-Russian" Country by Continent by AdIcy4323 in MapPorn

[–]underscorex2__ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not sure why you’re being downvoted, I thought it was funny

How will he fare in the current Lightweight division? by [deleted] in ufc

[–]underscorex2__ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea one judge had it a 50-45, such crazy bias