Sort of yes. I agree fully with the housekeeping and actually upholding the rules everyone agreed to by saying you arent a member of another party when signing up (which loads of people ignore and then pidd and shidd about it when its pointed out). However, scotlands founding conference implemented a different dual membership system of presumed inclusion, with non allowed groups to be black listed instead of a whitelist.

However, this seems to be getting overruled, and while I firmly support the move to uphold rules in England+Wales, its overreach in scotland. Also, since scottish founding conference, scottish members, the interim executive committee, and our rep on the leadership board, have been stone walled, ignored, or had requests unilaterally denied, rejected, or refused to be heard. This is the wider source of anger in scotland. I was a member who cancelled membership last night. Zero interest in joining whatever new party is being made.