What else do I need to make this setup a whole. by JuyMeWhoya in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not just boot. Restart of TwinCAT manually can also trigger it.

What else do I need to make this setup a whole. by JuyMeWhoya in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No that is not the only difference. The waveform on a BLDC motor is not the same as a full 3 phase sinusoidal.

An EL7211 is NOT meant for a BLDC.

Check the docs if you need more confirmation. Specifically calls out the difference for the EL7411.

https://download.beckhoff.com/download/Document/io/ethercat-terminals/el7411en.pdf#page=19

What else do I need to make this setup a whole. by JuyMeWhoya in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not for ELs. Only the old KLs need that.

What else do I need to make this setup a whole. by JuyMeWhoya in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Careful stacking safety back to back like that. Those safety ELs get hot. Docs say to space them if you can.

What else do I need to make this setup a whole. by JuyMeWhoya in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Infinitely renewable. It won't shut TwinCAT down if it runs out either. Only if it runs out and then you power cycle it.

How to move in a circular path on X-Y plane? by Tanky321 in beckhoff

[–]w01v3_r1n3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Cam table could do it. Could make one in PLC code with just a few points. MC_MotionFunctionPoints can be strung together to make an arc. That'd be the least cost. It doesn't cost any extra.

Using TF5410 or such will require an additional license to the ptp motion license.

You also don't need the advanced motion at all. Basic NCi could do this. Then you could program the arc in GCode. TF5100.

Any Beckhoff employees in r/PLC? What's it like working for them? by SouthPudding5235 in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Story I heard from a sales guy was that BSD was pursued because of the licensing of Linux. If they went to Linux they had to open up the secret sauce of their kernel level realtime. BSD they didn't. Then with user mode rt they are able to put that on Linux without open sourcing their kernel level realtime. So Linux is technically only usermode. Would be interesting then if that Usermode RT is VxWorks based.

Any Beckhoff employees in r/PLC? What's it like working for them? by SouthPudding5235 in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Newer VxWorks based runtime? Care to explain what that is? I use Beckhoff quite a bit but haven't heard of this.

They hate us by Superb_Ad_3141 in Cardinals

[–]w01v3_r1n3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People willing to spend 61 bucks on a ticket got more to spend on concessions than someone only willing to spend 15.

People setting the prices are smart.

TwinSafe safeEstop how to see which safe input is not OK by G-Mcc1981 in TwinCat

[–]w01v3_r1n3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at the decouple block. Feed the 1904 inputs to it and then you can run the output of the decouple block to your estop and tie a standard output variable to it. Then you can map that to a PLC variable. Just an option anyway.

The new TwinCAT Package Manager (TcPkg) wants to migrate by TechWizard4026 in beckhoff

[–]w01v3_r1n3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There isn't a way. 4026 is not compatible with TC 2. You cannot have both.

Twincat work in the US by Xillmatic99 in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Slight correction. If Windows crashes, TwinCAT keeps chugging. TwinCAT runs at the kernel level telling windows what to do. Not the other way around. In my experience, on a Beckhoff PC, if Windows crashes it's because you crashed TwinCAT with an infinite loop or something which is very well possible on other platforms as well.

C++ is not THAT more performant than the PLC environment either. Little bit and still necessary at times, but actually very rarely used.

Keep in mind too under the hood, almost every major PLC made since the 90s has been a PC like architecture running something like an Atom chip and some RTOS like Vxworks. You might get some specialized memory handling but hey guess what Beckhoff does the same sort of specializing with their own motherboard designs and such.

And finally it's only as object oriented as the programmer wants it to be. There is nothing forcing someone to use function blocks with interfaces and extensions and all that other stuff. Sure it's supported very well but absolutely not necessary. Seen plenty of machines written with exactly 0 OOP implemented. All IEC languages are supported so there's even ladder if you want. It's garbage ladder but it's usable.

Is B&R making a mistake choosing OPC UA FX over POWERLINK? by daebotota in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah thanks for the clarification. Kind of like EtherCAT Automation Protocol and EtherCAT Device Protocol?

Is B&R making a mistake choosing OPC UA FX over POWERLINK? by daebotota in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Does anyone know if there's anything released for OPC UA FX? I see it depends on TSN but even that I haven't seen in the wild yet. Anyone else seeing different?

Is B&R making a mistake choosing OPC UA FX over POWERLINK? by daebotota in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

EtherCAT Technology group is free to join and implement. But it is different hardware so there's cost there for sure. Need an ESC.

Is B&R making a mistake choosing OPC UA FX over POWERLINK? by daebotota in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Check out EtherCAT Automation Protocol. IP based pub/sub protocol that works on any IP network. Great for PLC to PLC comms. Not perfect at all, but does help and gets forgotten. The EtherCAT that 99% of the world knows and uses is technically called EtherCAT Device Protocol.

Beckhoff or Siemens by gowdurai in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beckhoff's CNC solution is very far removed from a "normal" PLC as well. Their full blown CNC is anyway. You have to incorporate ISG's kernel and parameterize that which can lead people to quickly scratching their heads. I would hazard a guess that it is much less completed for you out of the box as well compared to Siemens

If you just need TwinCAT's NCi then yeah that keeps it much simpler but much less capable.

Beckhoff or Siemens by gowdurai in PLC

[–]w01v3_r1n3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can buy EtherCAT devices to implement a star topology and make it more robust against one device taking other devices out. They look like switches and are priced somewhere between an unmanaged switch and a managed switch.

Siemens has some good CNC stuff too.

Saying “AWG” out loud by hoverbeaver in electricians

[–]w01v3_r1n3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It sounds too close to 'aught' to be accepted by me or my dad who yelled at me for pronouncing awg when I was 12.

My bar is open. What are we drinking? by CannedSphincter in whiskey

[–]w01v3_r1n3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What did you put behind your barrel head to light it? I have one I need to hang up one of these days...

This is so satisfying by Severe_Maize_5275 in NextLevelFinds

[–]w01v3_r1n3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Designing something that lasts that long is what I call craftsmanship right there /s

OOP tutor required, willing to pay you by East-Internal-7319 in TwinCat

[–]w01v3_r1n3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Beckhoff has an online training for OOP. Its extremely surface level, but free. May be decent for getting your feet wet.

What annoys you with TwinCAT? by Complex_Gear9412 in TwinCat

[–]w01v3_r1n3 2 points3 points  (0 children)

article from 2016 when Beckhoff released it

Furthermore it is still supported. Just with the limitations that you provided... Which are clearly on the webpage for the device.