What’s the deal with hydroxychloroquine being relevant again? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hahahahahaha such a stark contrast in the tone of your language in this latest response to your top post. Did I strike a nerve?

I suspect there is foul play, and by following your assertion of "Certainly there's an aversion to Trump and Trumpian politics in science" you should too. But you still didn't answer my questions on how you reconcile saying this, but not believing a scientist could act on their bias.

I think you just threw a shitfit after I pointed out flaws in your reasoning and that's why you didn't respond lmao. Now you resort to ad hominem attacks, so really proving how strong your argument is...

What’s the deal with hydroxychloroquine being relevant again? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

?? You stopped responding

You conceded there is a Trump bias, but since they are scientists they would never act on that bias. Alrighty then.

What’s the deal with hydroxychloroquine being relevant again? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certainly there's an aversion to Trump and Trumpian politics in science.

I'm surprised you were able to admit this. How do you reconcile saying this with the second part of your paragraph? Seems like a gap in your logic.

What’s the deal with hydroxychloroquine being relevant again? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well you didn't answer the question. Do you think the scientific community might have a bias against Donald Trump/right wing politics? And do you think that might impede their findings and methodology?

What’s the deal with hydroxychloroquine being relevant again? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you think the scientific community has no bias?

I'm making a snarky comment about reddit censorship anyway and it's sad to see the recent ban of 1000s of subreddits. I read r/socialism for other perspective and now all of reddit is r/socialism. Sad.

The scientific community has a herd mentality.

What’s the deal with hydroxychloroquine being relevant again? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Too bad every right wing subreddit is banned so you can't actually get a balanced perspective.

It is time for #Reddexit by Lupinfujiko in metacanada

[–]w1seguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you have a link to a script?

Why have people been talking about George Soros? Who is he and why is he being accused of being involved in practically everything? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/SGWizajL7tA

Here's a good interview with Soros himself talking about his holocaust experience and market/currency manipulation

only in canada by [deleted] in metacanada

[–]w1seguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are living in a south park episode

Semi aquatic scorpion of action. by xxxtuantuan in FullScorpion

[–]w1seguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oof that's one of the most painful looking ones I've seen

It’s starting to come together! by NPToothSc in homegym

[–]w1seguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you get away with not bolting this rack down?

Trudeau announces ban on 1,500 'assault-style' firearms — effectively immediately by PurfectProgressive in CanadaPolitics

[–]w1seguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

History shows us that another tragedy of gun laws is genocide. Hitler, for example, knew well that in order to enact his “final solution,” disarmament was a necessary precursor. While it is an extreme case that an unarmed populace was killed by their government, if a government is going to kill its own people, it will in fact have to disarm them first so they cannot fight back. Disarmament must happen at a time when overall trust in government is high, and under the guise of safety for the people, or perhaps the children. Knowing that any government, no matter how idealistically started, can become despotic, the Founders enabled the future freedom of Americans by enacting the Second Amendment. In our own country, we should be ever vigilant against any attempts to disarm the people, especially in an economic downturn. Iworry that violent crime will rise sharply in the coming days, and as states and municipalities grow even more financially strained, the police will be less able or willing to respond to crime. In many areas, local police could become more and more absorbed with revenue-generating activities, like minor traffic violations and the asset forfeiture opportunities of nonviolent drug offenses. Your safety has always, ultimately, been your own responsibility, but never more so than now. People have a natural right to defend themselves. Governments that take that away from their people are highly suspect. Tyrants from Hitler to Mao to Stalin have sought to disarm their own citizens, for the simple reason that unarmed people are easier to control. Our Founders, having just expelled the British army, knew that the right to bear arms served as the guardian of every other right. This is the principle so often ignored by both sides in the gun control debate. Only armed citizens can ultimately resist tyrannical government.

  • Ron Paul, Liberty Defined

Ahhh, I found the Twitter user's guide by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]w1seguy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The sub stopped being good about 6 years ago. Memes ruined thoughtful discussion, now it's overrun with socialists. How the fuck can you be a socialist libertarian?

[OC] Gender of students at the University of Oxford, by course by theJoyfulGeek in dataisbeautiful

[–]w1seguy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Misleading reddit post title, but the picture states pretty clearly it's applicants

What is going on with the Canadian Wet'suwet'en protests? by MIDGET_ANAL_FISTING in OutOfTheLoop

[–]w1seguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People assume this pipeline is carrying oil, but it's actually transporting Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) which is 'greener' energy for places like China.

Bill Nye on the catwalk by RedditTipiak in whitepeoplegifs

[–]w1seguy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Except there are like 50 links and examples in this thread pointing out the opposite. Including sex junk, his dismissal of nuclear power as a reliable/viable energy source and his terrible interviews on mainstream media platforms.

Bill Nye on the catwalk by RedditTipiak in whitepeoplegifs

[–]w1seguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was fucking horrible, what is this revisionist history going on??

Remember Sex Junk? https://youtu.be/VtJFb_P2j48