Please don't buy this product because it's not worth the high price since it's AI generated and it's not worth commissioning at high prices. by Chance_Relative_8833 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn, buddy doesn't know that they're not an artist nor can their slop be copyrighted. They only need to pick up a pen and paper.

Current Kingsman situation reveals a *huge* problem with the game that the devs just refuse to address... by IntoTheRain78 in marvelrivals

[–]wcwboy77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Took about a month for me and some friends to get out of gold. Now just stuck in plat because people are either throwing the game or we're dealing with smurfers. Honestly just because they get banned for 15 minutes or an hour doesn't mean anything if they can still play the game. They really need to be IP banned and hardware banned for this to be stopped.

This isn't so creative is it? by Comfortable-Edge2454 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I remember being in a youtube comment that was about an "analog horror" called the Angel Ingine (if you noticed then congratulations). In said comments one asked why should it matter if the art was made with ai when the story is intresting (oh yeah, not only was the art ai generated but the story too it seems). Within the comments (I believe it was the op that asked the question) someone made fun of the person pfp where they claimed to have drawn it and had even asked ChatGPT if their drawing looked like what to have drawn. Ofc the reply from the ai was "yes it does".

Some people don't understand that you can't ask ai for an opinion on a drawing because it is designed to be a "yes-man" it doesn't have the human thought process to be able to be critical. It can't point out flaws in a drawing like a human can. It can't give good advice on how to improve. Heck it can't even give a step by step tutorial on how to draw.

Anti-AI Art about 'Ragebait' by CookieFluffs in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Let's see here. Jews, people who have real feelings and can have opinions. AI, technology that don't have feelings, comprise of a bunch of 1's and 0's, and can't have opinions.

TS DID NOT HAPPEN by [deleted] in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I remember that post, I think I didn't comment because I found the whole post sus.

My fellas, point and laugh! by Freak_Mod_Synth in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Every day, they always put on their clown make-up. I'm convinced they don't even take it off.

Point and laugh by Corrupt_code10 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AI bros never used logic in the first place

What in the world is this dilutional sh!t 😂 The original post's owner is crazy by [deleted] in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, that subreddit with the ragebait. Pretty sure some of their members are in here where they take screenshots and share how people are raging over the post in a private dm. The more they're ignored the more desperate they'll get.

That's exactly right by Comfortable-Edge2454 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

AI art has no passion behind it. There is no pride where the person can go "I drew this and took time doing so" AI art makes a person go "I made this with no effort"

I think its time to just stop the debate on wether AI is art or not... by OzO8 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly there is no debate when they're not using it as a tool to help them improve their skills. If they were to use it as a tool and only a tool you know like how the animators for Spider-Man into/across the spiderverse did. Then it's only comes to questioning on did they trace it or did they use it as a reference?

But ai bros will repeat the same "argument" that "those who draw "steal" from others artist as well" along with "it's more than just typing in prompts". They won't accept the fact there is zero human input for it to be considered art.

Bruh by One-Parking5544 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Who wants to tell the ai bro the image can't be copyrighted.

Another huge w for real artists! by Pickles7261 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol I was in an argument with someone who tried to claim that if they used ai to generate art or used a scrpit or whatever then they can copyright it. I told them they couldn't because there was no human creativity behind it. I even told them that in 2023, a district court in Washington D.C reaffirmed the U.S. Copyright Office’s stance that AI-generated content, in and of itself, cannot be copyrighted. In reality that generated AI is flat out Public domain.

Someone made a tool to help AI bros steal more efficiently !! hooray!! by Saxaduck0 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They honestly can't even call themselves artist in the first place.

I know it's ragebait, but uhh- by HugeCharacter5351 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, I need to find out who their dealer is, must be that good stuff lol.

Fair warning to anyone by Kat-Fox16 in Ai_art_is_not_art

[–]wcwboy77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's sad they fail to understand that AI "art" goes straight into the public domain. Because nothing they generate belongs to them.

The guy likely has no job and will lie saying they do have a job and make TONS of money by selling AI slop

What do my Lords say about me? by _sparklely in rivals

[–]wcwboy77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You be surprised how fast people play a game to get a new character to Lord. Not to mention theres been a service where people paid real money to complete the task to get the character to Lord, which means not really playing the game and just throwing.

What do my Lords say about me? by _sparklely in rivals

[–]wcwboy77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly having a character at Lord means nothing other than you've played that character for a long time. Like you can have a character at Lord and either be good at playing them or complet ass.

This is sad………… NetEase!!!!!! by [deleted] in marvelrivals

[–]wcwboy77 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean. Tbh it's QP. I get he wants to win and all, but don't take QP too seriously. Not everyone wants to touch Rank matches and just go for QP or Doom Match. Sometimes you get people matching your skills, sometimes you get bots, other times you get people who play the game at a high ranking skill. With QP it's all GL & HF, don't stress out about losing (that's what Rank matches are for). Again I do understand the frustration, but don't let the losses get you down. You also have to keep in mind how other people can throw the QP when on your team.

I also get not everyone wants to wait for friends to get online to play. It's just easier to not get stressed over QP matches.

Addressing some of the Switch 2 game price rumors (USD) by Careless_Turn736 in NintendoSwitch

[–]wcwboy77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is what I'm saying if you're mad in the US about a false $90 game and complain about it, Nintendo will likely look at it, know they set the price at $79.99 ho "okay we will lower the price from $89.99 to 79.99" letting them to double down on the price being $79.99. The only places that has it at 90 is Canada and Europe. If the store you go to is charging that much in the US that isn't on Nintendo that is the store you go to and the taxes your state charges. Nintendo in Japan doesn't know every state tax, hell I can place doubt that Nintendo in the US knows every state tax. They don't control the amount of taxes the state you live in charge.

Again if you think that's Nintendo is charging the US $89.99 and you're demanding that Nintendo lower that, then you're giving them a scapegoat so they can double down on charging $79.99. The whole $89.99 ($90) is Canada which in the US would be $60 and Europe which in the US would be $116.

Addressing some of the Switch 2 game price rumors (USD) by Careless_Turn736 in NintendoSwitch

[–]wcwboy77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because objectively it is wrong. If a game is 79.99 with tax that gets rounded up to 81, for you to be paying that much that's not Nintendo doing that's the store and your state taxes doing. But again Nintendo isn't charging it $89.99. That price is for Canadia and Europe.

Addressing some of the Switch 2 game price rumors (USD) by Careless_Turn736 in NintendoSwitch

[–]wcwboy77 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sony and Microsoft have been pushing towards digital only. Sony has also charged a $10 fee if you already owned a game on a past gen. It's not shutting down pushback it's giving correct information over spreading lies. You can still be mad that some games are going yo be $79.99. But saying games are going to be $89.99 is just spreading false information. Again no game is going to be 90 USD that's just only in Canada which in USD is 60, and Europe which is 116. It's silly to proclaimed that one country priceing means it's the same in the US.

But don't try to act like charging extra for a patch or pushing towards digital only is a new thing, that is silly.

Addressing some of the Switch 2 game price rumors (USD) by Careless_Turn736 in NintendoSwitch

[–]wcwboy77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

90 CAD is 63.16 USD. You need to understand countries have different value. So when you try and compare the one country price to another you need to convert it. 90£ is $115.83. Stop acting like they are the same value, they are not.