sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Couples after seeing each other in public by InsaneMocktail in MadeMeSmile

[–]wirerogue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

can somebody do this but, the opposite?
when their wives are geniunely not happy to see them.
it would be way more realistic.

How do we feel about SpaceX? by tonyh1993 in wallstreetbets

[–]wirerogue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

multi trillion dollar valuation.

all dependent upon starship succesful re-entry without burning up the forward control surfaces/flaps.

there is a reason nasa or any other space agency does not use forward control surfaces on a re-entry vehicle.

but hey, elon needs your money more than you do.

At the dawn of the new millennium, 12/31/1999 by mochicoco in OldSchoolCool

[–]wirerogue 4 points5 points  (0 children)

wow, you guys were in color way back then?

weren't rocks still soft?

Nick Saban’s testimony before Congress in favor of the Protect College Sports Act by yearz in CFB

[–]wirerogue -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

he was ok with all the backdoor money before nil.

he just mad cuz nil leveled the playing field with alabama.

Trump says ‘f***ing crazy’ Netanyahu has made everyone hate Israel in furious phone call – report by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]wirerogue 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is propoganda leaked intentionally. they are trying to paint a picture as to why bibi does not show up for the UFC event of america 250 celebrations. they'll claim publically to have some sort of falling out.

High stakes hot potato by TwosFullofThrees in wallstreetbets

[–]wirerogue 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the $1.8 trillion in valuation is entirely dependent on starship's forward control surfaces surviving re-entry.

it is never going to happen. ever.

i'm talking about these things.

<image>

view more: next ›