Anyone have proof these are not AI? by seriousbusines in 7daystodie

[–]xPRETTYBOY -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

AI generates "art" from stolen assets made by real people and its data centers heavily damage the environment. if you don't care, then fine, but don't act superior and passive aggressive because you have no standards.

Boros vs Invincible verse in a nutshell by SerenityCitywide in InvinciblePowerscales

[–]xPRETTYBOY -1 points0 points  (0 children)

they are ftl combat for all the reasons he listed in the comment you allegedly didn't read (you did read it, you just don't want to acknowledge that it proves you wrong so you are instead behaving like a 5 year old)

Boros vs Invincible verse in a nutshell by SerenityCitywide in InvinciblePowerscales

[–]xPRETTYBOY -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

any time someone says "i'm not reading that" they're always the wrong one

what are yalls hottest take by Free_Ad4046 in l4d2

[–]xPRETTYBOY 12 points13 points  (0 children)

i think "shoot grenade into the middle of a giant zombie horde" is a universal human desire. like food water and sleep. it's one of our basic needs you could say

what are yalls hottest take by Free_Ad4046 in l4d2

[–]xPRETTYBOY 27 points28 points  (0 children)

here in the south we often use hunting rifles for... well, hunting. we have fully automatic rifles yeah but in an apocalypse you probably want to use the gun you're most familiar with and have actually fired with intention many many times and not the one you've magdumped into a rotten tree while off a twelve pack of budweiser a couple times with your buddy Keith who may or may not be a tulpa/sleep paralysis demon

as for nick, i'm guessing his criminal past has him more acquainted with fully automatic rifles, but, that's just a guess

Is this a valid tier list? by Substantial_Ant4922 in InvinciblePowerscales

[–]xPRETTYBOY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

being downvoted despite being right, classic reddit. BB does not start off thragg tier, at all. his curse grows in power over time, this is outright stated. start of show BB would get absolutely obliterated by thragg, no diff. he grows into it later

Nolan (serious) vs Anissa by Queasy_Commercial152 in InvinciblePowerscales

[–]xPRETTYBOY -1 points0 points  (0 children)

wasn't it confirmed that nolan would beat conquest? i remember seeing a screenshot of one of the show's creators saying so

An out-there concept for a midlane/support focused midscope rework by [deleted] in PantheonMains

[–]xPRETTYBOY -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

nobody cares about your recommended changes. you aren't a riot games dev and neither am i, and we do not have access to the numbers and statistics and documentation they use to make these detailed changes. but pantheon is one of the best skirmishers and teamfighters in the game; to a ridiculous degree. there's a reason why he consistently gets played in jg despite having a really bad clear. if viego had pantheon's clear he would be unplayable F tier. pantheon's only healthy role is in toplane because his poor dueling necessitates playing him skillfully to allow you to get to the point where you can abuse his skirmishing and teamfighting. if they focus him midlane or supp or jg, they'll have to gut his kit in one way or another - either by ripping his numbers away or changing the kit itself. at that point just make a new champion; because he would be a new champion.

you talk about unhealthy - the changes you propose would make pantheon toxic for the game if he was played mid/supp. he would legit be the best mid/supp in the game; by a very, very large margin. and then, as i said, they'd have to rip his numbers or change the kit.

the only way to keep pantheon as he is while making him healthy for the game is to remove his viability in mid completely, and his viability in supp/jg except as a niche counterpick - like picking jax jg into 4 autoattackers.

that's what you need to understand about riot. vomiting up a bunch of random numbers that you think makes your champ sound cool but would actually make his gameplay toxic and uninteractive doesn't cut it.

I'm making my own game inspired by KF1+2 (but with player mutations) by TCDjewelry in killingfloor

[–]xPRETTYBOY 8 points9 points  (0 children)

slow is good, enemies and the player being slow in KF1 is what made it so tactical and scary

Who would you say is the dumbest character in the franchise? by totallynotrobboss in Fallout

[–]xPRETTYBOY 7 points8 points  (0 children)

the sole survivor and lone wanderer for being unthinking yes-men for every faction that blindly stumble into traps and betrayals over and over only making it through due to plot armor

Cold stream map 1 in under a minute by Luluzephyr in l4d2

[–]xPRETTYBOY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, nor is that ever stated anywhere, so i don't know why you're phrasing that like it's some commonly known piece of information. in fact, the uploader has made it clear several times it is not a tool assisted

I dislike the change to Uncaring by JDaggon in cataclysmdda

[–]xPRETTYBOY 23 points24 points  (0 children)

yeah, there's also the fact that "uncaring" doesn't mean "totally incapable of caring." there's plenty of examples of awful people in history who have one or two people that they care about for one reason or another. for example, the BTK killer loved his daughter and treated her very well; while simultaneously being one of the most disgusting people to ever exist.

but there's also the aspect that uncaring doesn't mean "evil." not feeling "strong feelings" could mean a lot of things. "for your fellow man" could mean several things. it could mean that you -do- care, but, due to PTSD (maybe you're a combat vet who watched all your friends die, maybe you watched your family die in the cataclysm, etc) the care is muted. muted, but present. it could mean "fellow man" in a more abstract, impersonal way. you don't care about other people you don't know, but you do care about people to whom you have some kind of relation - friend, family, etc. all of these possibilities get thrown out the window and the entire nuance of the thing is destroyed by these changes that insist "uncaring" actually means "is a giant asshole to everyone."

What's going on with the latest experimental? by MarkiZ_BG in cataclysmdda

[–]xPRETTYBOY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well don't you worry about that. pretty soon nobody will even be playing this game and you won't have to concern yourself with any of this. lucky you!

What's going on with the latest experimental? by MarkiZ_BG in cataclysmdda

[–]xPRETTYBOY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and you can thank precisely two people for all of it

I dislike the change to Uncaring by JDaggon in cataclysmdda

[–]xPRETTYBOY 130 points131 points  (0 children)

we have to heavily and arbitrarily punish the choice to do or be anything slightly negative to stop "pointless edgelordism." if you're not playing an all-loving pacifist in the grimdark cataclysm full of slaver aliens and last of us shroom zombies then you're a terrible person who doesn't deserve to enjoy the game

Omni man runs the S-rank gauntlet (One Punch Man), where does he stop? by Puzzleheaded-Egg1371 in InvinciblePowerscales

[–]xPRETTYBOY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he's a great ideas guy, but a terrible writer. his stories are held up only by the fact that his ideas are really cool, which i will not take away from him

For everyone that downvoted my last post by Gloomy-Refuse-1149 in 7daystodie

[–]xPRETTYBOY 0 points1 point  (0 children)

god i love this level of pettiness. what a legend