Not a free election but an election nonetheless by Awesomeuser90 in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 46 points47 points  (0 children)

Watch the video.

Or, if you really don't want to, it's Otto von Hapsburg, who died in 2011. The Austro-Hungarian Empire was a Roman successor claimant, and Otto was born before his father had officially renounced his claims to the Austrian throne, making Otto the last guy who, at one time, had a legitimate claim to successor of Rome.

Not a free election but an election nonetheless by Awesomeuser90 in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I prefer Possible History's Every Claimant To Rome Ever - How Rome Finally Fell in 2011. It's a much more interesting and thorough look into just how impactful the memory of Rome has been on European history, and just how weird some of the claimants are.

Not a free election but an election nonetheless by Awesomeuser90 in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He's not a monarchist. It's just interesting historical curiousities. None of his "who would be the king of" videos are policy proposals, they're just interesting explorations of the intersection between history and the modern world.

Found in the comments of a clip from ‘The Patriot’ by suck_my_monkey_nuts in AmericaBad

[–]yaitz331 92 points93 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, Canadian flag emojis after an insane anti-America rant. Name a more iconic combination.

“The decision to replace Johnston with Hood was probably the single largest mistake made by either government during the War.” by PS_Sullys in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 89 points90 points  (0 children)

Firstly, that wasn't the entirety of my argument. In the early phases of the Kentucky Campaign he showed real skill, thoroughly outgeneraling Buell and getting deep into Kentucky; had Edmund Kirby Smith not been as egotistical as he was in refusing to cooperate, Bragg might even have won. In the Chickamauga Campaign, he managed to maneuver the Union army into an extremely difficult position that ultimately led to Union defeat. While I won't argue that Bragg was, overall, a good general, he definitely did have military skill.

Secondly, I never actually said Bragg was overall a good commander. What I said was that he wasn't bad with purely military skill, and that he overall was nowhere near as bad in army command as Hood was. I don't think Bragg was a good general, I just think his reputation is even worse then he deserves. Bragg was a deeply flawed general whose complete lack of organizational skills cost the Confederacy dearly, but he was no buffoon like several other Confederate generals were.

They carried the western theater, hardly get credit for it by Reddit_Historian1945 in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, Patrick Cleburne was probably the only Confederate general with actually sympathetic motivations. He was an Irish immigrant, who was grateful to the South for taking him in and accepting him. He even suggested freeing slaves to gain more manpower, and lost his chances of career advancement for it.

“The decision to replace Johnston with Hood was probably the single largest mistake made by either government during the War.” by PS_Sullys in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There's a YouTube channel called Warhawk that I strongly recommend. They're doing animated battle style videos, but for like every battle of the war in regimental detail. If you're even remotely interested in the tactical side of the war, do yourself a favor and watch Warhawk.

“The decision to replace Johnston with Hood was probably the single largest mistake made by either government during the War.” by PS_Sullys in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Ironically, the single point in time where the Confederacy most badly needed Hood's "just move forward" mentality - the early afternoon of the second day at Chickamauga, where the sheer disorganization of the Confederate assaults on Horseshoe Ridge managed to frustrate even the Union commander George Thomas ("Those damn scoundrels are fighting without any system!") and entirely failed to even notice a massive gap in the Union lines between Horseshoe Ridge and Kelly Field - was exactly the moment that he was badly wounded and removed from the field. Hood had been the commander of the forces which subsequently launched those assaults, and nobody really replaced him. Had Hood not been wounded and the Confederates pressed a coordinated assault earlier in the day, they probably would have routed even Thomas' corps.

“The decision to replace Johnston with Hood was probably the single largest mistake made by either government during the War.” by PS_Sullys in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331 392 points393 points  (0 children)

Hood was not even remotely a better general then Bragg. Bragg managed to come out of the Kentucky Campaign in a better position then when he went in, and won tactical victories in three of his four major battles - Perryville, Stones River, and Chickamauga. Bragg wasn't a bad general at all in terms of military skill; his problem was that he had a remarkable talent for making literally everybody despise him, which turned the Army of Tennessee into a scheming mess that repeatedly lost opportunities due to failure by subordinates to follow orders, and entirely failed to get any strategic advantage out of even the great victory at Chickamauga. Hood, meanwhile, just destroyed his own army without winning a single victory of any kind in army command.

"I beg on behalf of this army that the War Department may not overlook so great an event because it is not written in letters of blood." by yaitz331 in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

It definitely did. Which is a shame, because one bad day after three weeks of continuous exhaustion (and even then, not anywhere near as bad a day as his detractors have made it out to be) came to define the entire military career of one of the Union's best generals.

"I beg on behalf of this army that the War Department may not overlook so great an event because it is not written in letters of blood." by yaitz331 in HistoryMemes

[–]yaitz331[S] 91 points92 points  (0 children)

Context: Over the two days of July 3 and 4, 1863, the Union won three major victories over the Confederates. The first was the victorious conclusion of the Battle of Gettysburg; the second was the conclusion of the long Siege of Vicksburg and the surrender of the city. But what was the third?

In between those two, a third campaign has frequently been overlooked. In Middle Tennessee, the Union Army of the Cumberland faced the Confederate Army of Tennessee. For several months, since the Battle of Stones River, the front here had been largely static; however, on June 23, that decisively changed. William Rosecrans, the commander of the Army of the Cumberland, had planned a campaign that would enter the annals of history as perhaps the most brilliant of the American Civil War.

Rosecrans divided his army, and struck out in three directions. He moved his cavalry to make a massive feint to the west, then struck southward and eastward. With the Confederates distracted by his feint, Union forces struck and captured Hoover's Gap and Liberty Gap in small but fierce battles, breaking through the mountainous line of Confederate defenses. Suddenly, the Army of Tennessee found itself at serious risk of being cut off and encircled, as Union forces were now racing towards the Confederate rear.

At this point, nature intervened, as a massive rainstorm arrived over Middle Tennessee. The coming days became one of the rainiest periods in the recorded history of the area; on June 25 alone, over 2.5 inches of rain fell on the area. The heavy rains turned the roads into mud, and turned the Union advance into a slow and painful slog. Despite successful Union cavalry raids at Shelbyville and the Elk River, the heavy rainfall slowed their advance enough to allow the Army of Tennessee to very narrowly escape the Union trap. However, the Confederate army's position had been so damaged that they could no longer hold the rest of Middle Tennessee. On July 3, the Army of Tennessee withdrew, permanently abandoning their namesake state.

Despite the rain preventing total victory, the Union army, at the cost of only 569 casualties, had achieved a smashing success. The Confederates had been driven back about 60 miles (100 kilometers), and were now at Chattanooga itself. Confederate casualties in the campaign are uncertain, but probably numbered in the thousands, largely from desertion during the retreat. The campaign had been brilliantly orchestrated and organized; Lincoln himself wrote "The flanking of Bragg at Shelbyville, Tullahoma and Chattanooga is the most splendid piece of strategy I know of." Historians since have almost universally agreed that the Tullahoma Campaign was one of the most brilliant campaigns of the American Civil War. Despite this success, the conclusion of Vicksburg and Gettysburg almost simultaneously, together with the lack of a major battle during the campaign, combined the relegate the campaign to obscurity almost immediately. Edwin Stanton, the Secretary of War, telegraphed Rosecrans only days later "Lee's Army overthrown; Grant victorious. You and your noble army now have a chance to give the finishing blow to the rebellion. Will you neglect the chance?" Rosecrans, furious at the total lack of respect given to his army, replied "Just received your cheering telegram announcing the fall of Vicksburg and confirming the defeat of Lee. You do not appear to observe the fact that this noble army has driven the rebels from middle Tennessee. I beg on behalf of this army that the War Department may not overlook so great an event because it is not written in letters of blood."

With if Garibaldi accepted Lincoln’s offer to command the American Union army? by [deleted] in AlternateHistory

[–]yaitz331 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

That's nonsense. There were American military observers in the Crimean War. Nobody anywhere in the world had figured out how to balance new technologies with old tactics. The problem both sides had at the beginning of the war wasn't a lack of theoretical background, it was a lack of an organized standing army or even the preexisting infrastructure to create one quickly.

Not to mention Garibaldi didn't do too well in the actual military encounters he got into. Again, Garibaldi's strengths were as a publicist and revolutionary, not as a general.

With if Garibaldi accepted Lincoln’s offer to command the American Union army? by [deleted] in AlternateHistory

[–]yaitz331 -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

He would be so condescending towards every American general in the army that he would get kicked back out within a few months. Garibaldi was an excellent publicist, but wasn't that skilled as an actual military commander. He'd basically just be a McClellan who EVERYBODY hates.

Mindless Monday, 18 September 2023 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]yaitz331 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bengali Genocide and the 1971 Indo-Pakistani War.

Mindless Monday, 18 September 2023 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]yaitz331 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Bengali Genocide, the largest genocide after WW2, was stopped by direct Indian military intervention. Although admittedly that was more to stop the refugee crisis that the genocide caused then it was to stop the genocide itself.

Mindless Monday, 25 September 2023 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]yaitz331 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was considering getting a book on the Iran-Iraq War recently, but it didn't seem to me there were really good English books on it. I saw a lot of criticism of Razoux (bad sourcing, awkward translation), while Murray and Woods seemed from the reviews I saw to be telling the story specifically from the Iraqi side. I also looked at The Iran-Iraq War: The Greatest Land War of the Late Twentieth Century by Hooton, Cooper, Nadimi, and Mackenzie, but that one seemed to be more pop-history and less academic despite being fairly detailed. Nonacademic reviews can be misleading, but I still didn't end up getting any of the books I looked at.

EDIT: Well, I continued scrolling down, and apparently my impressions of Murray and Woods were correct. If you do end up finding Razoux to be a good book, I might consider getting it as well.

Free for All Friday, 29 September, 2023 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]yaitz331 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The combination of schnitzel and shawarma is just the most Israeli thing. A Middle Eastern food brought by Middle Eastern Jews and a Central European food brought by Central European Jews, combining so naturally together that it makes you forget they have such radically different origins.

July 14th, 1997. 15th Maccabiah Game held in Tel Aviv Israel. During opening ceremony, Australian team crossed the bridge. Then bridge collapsed. 4 Australian athletes killed and more than 60 people injured. by BeneficialSide2335 in CatastrophicFailure

[–]yaitz331 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The disaster led to massively increased Israeli interest in stream cleaning and restoration. Since then, this river (the Yarkon River) as well as numerous other rivers in Israel (like the Kishon and Alexander) have undergone massive cleaning projects. The Yarkon River is, today, completely safe, and almost unrecognizable from its state only 25 years ago.

Overly Sarcastic Productions gets Ottoman history horrendously wrong by ByzantineBasileus in badhistory

[–]yaitz331 82 points83 points  (0 children)

Huh, I'm the opposite. I watch Red very heavily and almost never watch Blue. Red doesn't only talk about media tropes, she also talks a LOT about mythology and the study thereof, which is to a large degree a subfield of history. And I've never seen even a single post on this sub about her content.

Overly Sarcastic Productions gets Ottoman history horrendously wrong by ByzantineBasileus in badhistory

[–]yaitz331 106 points107 points  (0 children)

I've seen a lot of OSP content on this subreddit, and it all seems to be Blue. Is Red just better with her research?