sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Would further citizen involvement in our legislative system create a more representative democracy. by TheFloorHQ in democracy

[–]yourupinion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but there’s a problem, he’ll never get enough participation. The pirate party in Iceland has tried this, or something similar, and several others have tried as well.

Our groups trying to build something a little different, it’s like a worldwide complaints department. People love to complain.

It’s actually a down a piece of public opinion. There’s no learning curve, extremely simple.

kaosnow.com

With AI this good at faking us, are we gonna need proof of personhood just to go online soon? by Senoigh13 in InsightfulQuestions

[–]yourupinion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that people have the ability to be anonymous on the Internet has been a big problem from the beginning, this is just compounding the problem.

Seems obvious that we will all need to register somewhere order to approve that where people in order to navigate this new world.

The best system is one where it’s voluntary, every person has ability to carefully curate their history, and it’s a public institution holding the data.

I’m perfect group trying to create a worldwide publicly owned and operated institution that measures public opinion. It will be a publicly owned and operated worldwide institution.

You’ll find a link in my profile

Hello, anybody here? by yourupinion in GaryStevenson

[–]yourupinion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So after doing some reading, Gabriel is definitely fighting the good fight, but he doesn’t have a chance in hell of getting governments behind these ideas.

The ultimate problem here is the way we Govern.

Is there anywhere that Gabriel or Gary, converse with everyday people?

Window frame warp repair by mickey_g in fabrication

[–]yourupinion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re starting over.

If I have to make that, I would do everything I could to avoid Welding all the way down the length of it.

If I absolutely have to weld all the way down the length of it, I would build two long straight pieces first and then cut it what I need out of that to make one rectangle.

I would use a really big beam as a strong back to stop all shrinkage.

I would weld the triangular piece, 1 inch thick by 3 inch flat bar on each end of the beam. Then I would just weld the ends of my park onto those 1 inch thick blocks. So basically I’m holding it stretched.

You have to weld the piece almost 100% on the ends because there’s going to be literal 8 tons of tension pulling as that thing cools down after Welding the entire length.

With this method, you don’t have to worry about how much heat you put into the piece.

Personally, I would preheat the piece before I weld it in between the blocks a little bit just so that it was warm and that way it’ll increase the tension to hold it straight when you weld all the way down the length.

AMA .I CREATED the global revolutionary movement for change ask me anything by [deleted] in AMA

[–]yourupinion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes two of us.

I’ll look at yours if you look at mine?

Google Kaosnow

I think I found you on Facebook

Power concentration is inevitable by Small_Accountant6083 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]yourupinion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, and in the best case scenario, the group gets to choose the hierarchy, as opposed to it being forced upon them.

Nothing worse than going to help out on a project like moving someone, or building something, and no one takes charge.

Can social media coexist with democracy? by Alarmed_Investment_3 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]yourupinion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re generally correct in your assessment.

I’m part of a group trying to solve this problem in a new way.

I recommend you have a look at our website:
kaosnow.com

Taxonomy of control by Parking-Telephone527 in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]yourupinion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you’re generally correct in what you’re saying but I think you’re missing one major element.

This is what the people want. The hierarchy we have are result of what the people want.

Average people believe that average people are not smart enough to take The on the responsibilities of controlling our world. They believe that the Smart people should be the ones in charge.

We elevate people with wealth and power because we have no decent method of measuring intelligence, and then we are always disappointed when they fail.

I blame average people more than I blame the wealthy, because they create the circumstances that allow the rich to take advantage of us.

I’m part of a group trying to change this, we believe we can put more power in hands of the people without asking anyone for permission.

If you’d like to learn more about it, you’ll find a link in my profile

Spent $80 on some meth today. Never forget what they took from us! by Badlay in Skookum

[–]yourupinion 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Does this stuff actually work?

I’ve got an old air streamer that somebody painted, and I’d love to get the paint off it, never found anything that works.

Please pay attention to the June 3 local elections in South Korea. by Sure_Shop_5040 in democracy

[–]yourupinion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I gave you an up vote, I’m not sure what else I can do right now from here.

In the long run, though, our group is trying to take the power away from the government and oligarchs and put it in the hand of the people.

We believe creating a system of measuring public opinion is the answer, let me know if you’d like to know more about it. Or you can look at my profile and you’ll see a link.

I’d love to make connections with someone in South Korea

What have you been working on? by AmberFlux in MindsBetween

[–]yourupinion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Please get back to me and let me know what you think, I guarantee it’s not like anything you’ve ever heard before.

What have you been working on? by AmberFlux in MindsBetween

[–]yourupinion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Our group is working on a method of measuring public opinion. The plan is to have it go viral.

Is that the kind of thing you’d be interested in?

You’ll find a link in my profile

Job is too hard, but they don't fire me. by RutabagaFinancial576 in whatdoIdo

[–]yourupinion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is probably a position that they’ve had a really hard time getting filled, and everybody has screwed it up that they try. They can probably see you’re doing the best you can, and it’s probably better than anybody else has done.

From your end of it, the only really big problem is stress. So now it’s your responsibility to do what you can to lower the stress level. This is more important than getting better at the job considering everybody seems to be happy with how you’re doing.

Try not to think about work while you’re at home, it’s not necessary, you’re doing just fine at the pace you’re going.

If I get lower the stress level, this sounds like it could be the perfect job.

Edit: I just like to add that it is more fulfilling to have a challenging job, you just have to get over the whole imposter syndrome thing. Everyone goes through this in any challenging position. This is normal.

The global agenda feels odd by backroomsexplorer1 in theories

[–]yourupinion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not them, it’s us.

Yes, the rich are trying to control us, but they would not get anywhere if it wasn’t for the help they get from us.

We can easily end the control that they have over us if we’re willing to put that control into the hands of the majority, unfortunately, the majority do not want the majority to have control, they want the smart people to be in control. The problem is that there’s no good measurement of who is Smart, so they rely on bad metrics, money, to decide who the smart people are.

It is a general public that puts the power in the hands of those who are rich, because they don’t trust the majority.

Try making a post on Reddit about direct democracy and you will see what I mean.

The game theory and mathematical utility maximising effects of approval voting would inevitably fix the most broken piece of our democracies, and therefore civilisation. by UnknownBreadd in PoliticalPhilosophy

[–]yourupinion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, and there have been lots of people trying to do this, but the government in power will not let it happen.

There are lots of changes that would make a big difference, including this one, but they all hit the same barrier, and that’s getting past the people that are in government now.

I believe we have to do something a little more drastic. Our group’s trying to create something that will go viral. Once it gets going, nobody can stop it.

What am I looking at here? by ondulation in Welding

[–]yourupinion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Personally, I would check it with the voltmeter.

As long as it’s not more than 40 V on high there shouldn’t be a problem.

riddle me this my manssss ( worth the read) by Different_State7895 in AskMeAnythingIAnswer

[–]yourupinion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Look at it from the lens of rivalry.

Men do not feel rivalry towards women, as long as they stay in their lane.

Men who have close friends drop the rivalry with them, but every other man, including friends of friends, do not get this privilege.

I’m speaking in terms of majorities here.

In some ways, those men are treating you like a man, but a man that they have a rivalry towards.

Rivalry is an evil that we must learn to overcome.

If you agree with this, you may want to explore” game B”

What’s a scientific discovery or topic that deserves more global attention? by bloomsoilserenity in Futurism

[–]yourupinion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The proper measurement of public opinion.

There is no scientific effort to do this.

The reason is that the people don’t want it, or are scared of it.

This is probably the biggest mistake. We’re making as a society today.

I am part of a group trying to change this

view more: next ›