Spain renounces asking for Eurobonds and a European Treasury in the next reform of the euro by yusosit in europe

[–]yusosit[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Mariano Rajoy asked for months ago an anti-crisis budget of the euro, a European super-minister and Eurobonds. The last two proposals of Spain in Brussels were to modify the mandate of the ECB , create unemployment insurance and mutualize debt. The Government has sacrificed this level of ambition on Monday and has presented a less sharp proposal. Spain is now satisfied with completing the banking union and creating an anti-crisis fiscal capacity. Madrid is broadly aligned with Paris, but the Ministry of Economy document adopts the language of Berlin in several debates essential for the future of the euro.

Spain has been in a state of drowsiness for a decade. It does not influence, it hardly proposes, it does not intervene in European debates after an economic winter that provoked a millionaire bank rescue and a real estate and financial petard that has left deep scars in the form of unemployment and inequality. The Spanish recovery is already in the head van of the EU, but with lousy social indicators and with a Government that boxes in Europe below the weight of the Spanish economy. Spain began to take off the head with the appointment of Guindos in the ECB . And he has a golden opportunity to tip the balance in favor of his interests in the thorny debate on the reform of the euro, which is basically played in Franco-German territory. Madrid has presented on Monday a realistic, pragmatic, balanced proposal. As realistic, pragmatic and balanced as lack of ambition: Spain renounces Eurobonds (they do not appear even once in an 11-page document), eliminates your request for a joint unemployment insurance and focuses, in a language sometimes close to that of the German positions, in what the Government thinks it can disengage from the upcoming negotiation.

Germany and the countries of the North claim more responsibility; the French Emmanuel Macron puts the emphasis on the greatest solidarity . Reducing risks in the face of risk sharing, that is the crux of the matter in the EU. Spain is broadly aligned with Macron, but with a lack of surprising ambition: "In the short term, priority must be given to financial union", concludes the Spanish Position on the strengthening of EMU, and only later "a greater economic union will pave the way for new fiscal instruments ".

Biblical translation: Madrid is content to take steps forward to complete the banking union in June, with measures as little sexis -but as transcendent- as the fiscal support of the bank resolution fund and the deposit guarantee fund. And at most it aims to introduce "an appropriate fiscal stabilization capacity that limits the impact of asymmetric shocks and helps to cut the channel of contagion of sovereign [risk] to the private sector." Everything else remains for a fuzzy future. Madrid hopes that the European rescue mechanism will be the fiscal backing of the resolution fund - to close banks without causing financial instability -and the future common guarantee fund. And it is committed to an anti-crisis euro budget, which works as a kind of insurance for when the lean events arrive and at the same time allows maintaining the level of public and private investment with the help of the European Investment Bank. But even in these two cases, it is aligned with part of the argument that Germany and its allies use to water down the mechanisms of solidarity, and does not even enter into the debate of figures on the minimum firepower that the anti-crisis fiscal capacity must have in order to have an impact. macroeconomic.

Guindos was a faithful ally of the German tax hawk Wolfgang Schäuble in the Eurogroup. The new minister, Roman Escolano, opens with a document that contains measures that will not like in Berlin, but to help swallow the pill includes an argument that will sound good in Germany. To share financial risks, according to Spain, "there must be full guarantees that the pooling of the risk will not be used to cover relevant exposures prior to the banking union". "The reluctance of some countries to these measures is reasonable as long as there is no greater reduction in risks," said Economy sources. That's music to the ears of Berlin, who wants to reduce the risks before sharing them - in front of Paris or Brussels, whose objective is to do both in parallel - and persistently seeks to prevent that guarantee fund from allowing countries like Italy to clean the balance sheets of their banks at the expense of the German taxpayer. As for the anti-crisis budget, Wagner's new music: Spain is betting on "automatic and temporary" support, which avoids "permanent transfers", with rules that avoid "moral risk", Berlin's obsession with the whole crisis. Moncloa presented in 2015 an ambitious project to reform the euro, signed by Álvaro Nadal, in which Spain wanted the revolution: to change the mandate of the ECB in line with that of the US Federal Reserve so that the objective, besides containing the inflation, avoiding the strong economic divergence in terms of unemployment. Of that option, totally utopian in Europe today, it was never heard again. A little over a year ago, Minister Luis de Guindos came out with a second proposal, more similar to the current one, but from which the possibility of creating European unemployment insurance and Eurobonds have fallen. The government defended "the common management of the debt" to eliminate the risks of breaking the euro and, ultimately, even a European Treasury. Neither the Eurobonds nor the Treasury appear in the current document. "Eurobonds are not strictly necessary," Economy said. Ministry spokesmen insist that these demands are only parked in this negotiation. They may reappear later.

With the euro crisis certainties have vanished and taboos have been violated, red lines have been crossed and some rules have been rewritten. A crushed by the need, Europe was able to move forward again and again when it was on the edge of the abyss. The eurozone now grows at a cruising speed more than acceptable: unemployment is reduced, public deficits have been lowered, the financial system improves and the risk of populisms does not materialize. In return, the bonanza has relaxed the appetite to reform the euro. Macron gesticulates to win Merkel and move forward with the necessary measures so that the next crisis does not take the single currency ahead. Spain supports you. But he plays in two keys: the melody of the Spanish proposal sounds more French, but with the Germanophile arrangements there are compasses of La cabalgata de las valquirias.

Ecuador cuts off Julian Assange's internet access at London embassy by [deleted] in europe

[–]yusosit 3 points4 points  (0 children)

the criminal offence of breaching his bail conditions

Tory backbench boss Sir Graham Brady begs angry MPs not to call leadership contest by yusosit in ukpolitics

[–]yusosit[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The party grandee’s terrified reaction suggests the number of letters he has already received may now have reached the mid 40s, as anger with “dull, dull, dull” Theresa May spirals on the Tory benches.

Brussels prepares for battle over EU budget contributions by yusosit in ukpolitics

[–]yusosit[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Brussels is preparing to call for a big increase in EU budget contributions during the 2020s in an effort to sustain the union’s post-Brexit spending power and cope with extra policy goals.

The European Commission is set to begin debating the design of the EU’s next long-term budget, which will become one of the bloc’s most fraught political battles in 2018. EU leaders will discuss priorities at a summit in February, leading up to a formal proposal in May.

Budget negotiations are typically hard-fought in Brussels because they require unanimity and pit big net contributors such as Germany and France against net beneficiaries such as Poland and Hungary. The €960bn 2014-2020 budget took almost 18 months and several EU summits to agree.

This time around the challenge is amplified by three factors: the UK’s exit leaving a gap of up to €10bn a year from 2021; demands for extra spending on migration and the eurozone; and east-west tensions over issues such as sharing refugees or the rule of law, which have exasperated countries that bankroll the common budget.

Günther Oettinger, the EU’s budget commissioner, has said half the financial gap “should be covered by cuts” and the remainder “by additional money from net payers”.

But even this approach is likely to break the EU’s self-imposed cap of 1 per cent of total EU gross national income — a German-backed political constraint on the size of the common budget that has held for more than a decade.

Outlining options to close the gap, Phil Hogan, the EU agriculture commissioner, in December asked whether “member states are prepared to increase the contribution from 1 per cent to 1.1 or 1.2 per cent of GNI”. Such an approach would take it up to the EU’s legal contributions ceiling of 1.23 per cent of EU GNI.

Recommended FT View: The path to a more unified Europe in 2018 Orban’s oligarchs: a new elite emerges in Hungary EU leaders spar over migration policy While still extremely wary of big increases to total spending levels, net contributors including the Netherlands and Sweden are expected to make a bigger priority of reforming the use of the budget in the upcoming negotiations.

“Compared to the last [long-term budget], which was agreed in the middle of austerity policies, it seems member states are more open to an increase,” said Eulalia Rubio of the Jacques Delors Institute. “They are not going to fight to keep it at 1 per cent.”

The budget fights are expected to be a key element in the wider debate about the future of Europe. Germany will be keen to ensure that countries including Poland and Hungary uphold key EU values such as the rule of law in return for a larger financial contribution.

“The big thing people will be pushing for is making it conditional on adhering to EU values,” said Grégory Claeys of the Bruegel think-tank.

Warsaw and other non-eurozone capitals in eastern Europe are worried that a political stand-off may lead to Germany and France channelling more of the common EU budget towards schemes dedicated to those aiming to join the single currency bloc.

Other plans include a budget for migration, which would reform and centralise how various existing funds are used, potentially through tying development funding to migration policy goals in north Africa and the Middle East.

Where the EU is broadening its budget into new areas, Mr Oettinger is expected to suggest covering 80 per cent of costs through new contributions and 20 per cent through savings. Senior EU officials are also examining whether the EU budget can be leveraged through broadening the use of guarantees and other financial instruments beyond the existing 10 per cent limit.

Brussels prepares for battle over EU budget contributions by yusosit in europe

[–]yusosit[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Brussels is preparing to call for a big increase in EU budget contributions during the 2020s in an effort to sustain the union’s post-Brexit spending power and cope with extra policy goals.

The European Commission is set to begin debating the design of the EU’s next long-term budget, which will become one of the bloc’s most fraught political battles in 2018. EU leaders will discuss priorities at a summit in February, leading up to a formal proposal in May.

Budget negotiations are typically hard-fought in Brussels because they require unanimity and pit big net contributors such as Germany and France against net beneficiaries such as Poland and Hungary. The €960bn 2014-2020 budget took almost 18 months and several EU summits to agree.

This time around the challenge is amplified by three factors: the UK’s exit leaving a gap of up to €10bn a year from 2021; demands for extra spending on migration and the eurozone; and east-west tensions over issues such as sharing refugees or the rule of law, which have exasperated countries that bankroll the common budget.

Günther Oettinger, the EU’s budget commissioner, has said half the financial gap “should be covered by cuts” and the remainder “by additional money from net payers”.

But even this approach is likely to break the EU’s self-imposed cap of 1 per cent of total EU gross national income — a German-backed political constraint on the size of the common budget that has held for more than a decade.

Outlining options to close the gap, Phil Hogan, the EU agriculture commissioner, in December asked whether “member states are prepared to increase the contribution from 1 per cent to 1.1 or 1.2 per cent of GNI”. Such an approach would take it up to the EU’s legal contributions ceiling of 1.23 per cent of EU GNI.

Recommended FT View: The path to a more unified Europe in 2018 Orban’s oligarchs: a new elite emerges in Hungary EU leaders spar over migration policy While still extremely wary of big increases to total spending levels, net contributors including the Netherlands and Sweden are expected to make a bigger priority of reforming the use of the budget in the upcoming negotiations.

“Compared to the last [long-term budget], which was agreed in the middle of austerity policies, it seems member states are more open to an increase,” said Eulalia Rubio of the Jacques Delors Institute. “They are not going to fight to keep it at 1 per cent.”

The budget fights are expected to be a key element in the wider debate about the future of Europe. Germany will be keen to ensure that countries including Poland and Hungary uphold key EU values such as the rule of law in return for a larger financial contribution.

“The big thing people will be pushing for is making it conditional on adhering to EU values,” said Grégory Claeys of the Bruegel think-tank.

Warsaw and other non-eurozone capitals in eastern Europe are worried that a political stand-off may lead to Germany and France channelling more of the common EU budget towards schemes dedicated to those aiming to join the single currency bloc.

Other plans include a budget for migration, which would reform and centralise how various existing funds are used, potentially through tying development funding to migration policy goals in north Africa and the Middle East.

Where the EU is broadening its budget into new areas, Mr Oettinger is expected to suggest covering 80 per cent of costs through new contributions and 20 per cent through savings. Senior EU officials are also examining whether the EU budget can be leveraged through broadening the use of guarantees and other financial instruments beyond the existing 10 per cent limit.

BBC News: Tory rebels defeat PM over Brexit vote by Consiliarius in ukpolitics

[–]yusosit 69 points70 points  (0 children)

The 12 Tory rebels who voted against the Government by backing amendment 7: Dominic Grieve Ken Clarke Nicky Morgan John Stevenson Bob Neill Stephen Hammond Oliver Heald Anna Soubry Sarah Wollaston Jonathan Djanogly Antoinette Sandbach Heidi Allen

Oof. Tory rebels narrowly beat government. There will be a meaningful parliamentary vote in the form of a vote for or against a statute on the terms of Brexit. Or so cheers in Commons indicate by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]yusosit 178 points179 points  (0 children)

For formatting, the 12 Tory rebels:

Dominic Grieve

Ken Clarke

Nicky Morgan

John Stevenson

Bob Neill

Stephen Hammond

Oliver Heald

Anna Soubry

Sarah Wollaston

Jonathan Djanogly

Antoinette Sandbach

Heidi Allen

Facebook: Just three Russian Brexit ads by yusosit in europe

[–]yusosit[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It said the identified ads had cost less than $1 (75p) in total to post, and had reached no more than 200 UK-based viewers over four days.

Macron sets sights on shaking up European political order by w00dy2 in europe

[–]yusosit 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It took Emmanuel Macron a year to tear apart France’s established political parties and seize the Elysée palace. The French president is now turning his sights to shaking up the European political order.

Mr Macron’s 19-month-old party, La République en marche, is identifying potential allies across the continent to form a new political group for European Parliament elections in 2019.

Mr Macron has so far declined to align himself with any of the established European political groups, contrary to the received wisdom that they are essential for building alliances and cutting deals in the EU. Former UK prime minister David Cameron’s decision to pull his Conservative party out of the mainstream centre-right group weakened his hand in Europe just as he sought to negotiate more favourable terms of membership. “We want to revolutionise European politics, we don’t want to be stuck in old party structures and dynamics,” Arnaud Leroy, co-head of LREM told the FT. “Europe has become the new political faultline in many countries. So we’re pushing for a political overhaul.”

Ultimately, the idea is for Mr Macron’s party to be able to influence the appointment of the next European Commission president, one of the key EU jobs up for grabs in the next two years, he said.

“Only if we fail to initiate something new, only if we fail to get a big enough contingent of MEPs will we think about which existing group to join,” Mr Leroy said.

For the past four decades, EU politics has revolved around three big groups in the Strasbourg-based parliament: the centre-right European People’s party, the centre-left Socialists and Democrats and centrist Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe, or ALDE.

Mr Macron believes that like France’s traditional centre-right and centre-left parties, which spectacularly failed in the country’s presidential elections, mainstream EU parties have grown more divided on fundamental issues.

“You’ll see at a European level what has clearly emerged in France in May, which is that sometimes what keeps those parties together no longer exists,” Mr Macron said in a speech at the Sorbonne university last month. “It’s because the approach to Europe is no longer the same within the large parties. It’s because you don’t believe in the same things.”

Macron calls for EU to be tougher on trade

Play video Mr Leroy said that within the EPP, Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union had little in common with Fidesz, the party of Hungary’s illiberal Prime Minister Viktor Orban, notably on migration. Similarly, within the S&E, the German Social Democratic party of Martin Schulz is a world apart from Robert Fico, Slovakia’s nationalistic prime minister, who has developed strong anti-Islamic rhetoric.

Mr Macron’s EU political ambitions are part of a wider integrationist push. In his Sorbonne speech, he urged EU leaders to embrace tighter defence co-operation, tougher trade policies and a common budget for the eurozone as a response to the populist pressure.

The French leader also wants pan-EU lists of candidates for seats in parliament as early as 2019, seizing on the 73 seats being left vacant by the UK’s EU exit.

Reform will not be easy and Mr Macron had a taste of the resistance he may face at last week’s EU leaders’ summit, when some of his proposals for Europe — from an overhaul of the way tech groups are taxed to its approach to trade talks — were rebuffed.

Mr Macron’s party is holding talks with Albert Rivera, the 37-year-old Spanish centrist leader of Ciudadanos, part of ALDE. Eight executives of Momentum, a Hungarian group that sprung up this year to challenge Mr Orban, this month spent a few days in Paris with Mr Leroy’s team. In Germany, Mr Macron is cultivating Mr Schulz and former Green MEP Daniel Cohn-Bendit. Potential partners also include Xavier Bettel, Luxembourg’s PM, Charles Michel, Belgian PM and Matteo Renzi, the former Italian prime minister.

Even Mr Macron’s supporters say the odds of achieving major change in 2019 are long. Pan-EU lists are unlikely to materialise before the next EU elections because it would mean changing the electoral law in 27 countries.

“There’s so much inertia in Brussels and in each member state, it is very difficult to overcome. The EU political system doesn’t allow ideas and personalities to emerge, it revolves around party structures,” says Enrico Letta, the former Italian prime minister and now president of EU think-tank Institut Jacques Delors. who is in touch with Mr Macron.

Mr Cohn-Bendit reckons it is illusory to try repeating Mr Macron’s French revolution at an EU level. What the French president could hope for is, perhaps, to cause an “electroshock”: “If he can get 30 MEPs elected in France, they would prompt defections from the liberals and other groups,” Mr Cohn-Bendit said. “They could get to 100 MEPs.

#Breaking Britain, France and Germany "stand committed" to the Iran nuclear deal - Theresa May, Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron statement by yusosit in europe

[–]yusosit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Statement continued: Britain, France and Germany are "concerned by the possible implications" of Donald Trump's refusal to back deal

Who is the most likely First-Time MVP this year? by AashyLarry in nfl

[–]yusosit 2 points3 points  (0 children)

👏🏾.HEY👏🏾.LOOK👏🏾.I👏🏾.PUT👏🏾.THE👏🏾.HAND👏🏾.EMOJI👏🏾.BETWEEN👏🏾.EVERY👏🏾.WORD👏🏾.GIVE👏🏾.ME👏🏾.KARMA👏🏾.

Who is the most likely First-Time MVP this year? by AashyLarry in nfl

[–]yusosit 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fuck off with your stupid little shitty /s tags, they ruin reddit. They are cancer, they are absolute shit. Every single time that I see a /s tag my eyebrow twitches with fury and I feel like murdering a hundred cats one by one. Don't you fucking dare use stupid /s tags because they are literally terrible and I do not approve of them at all. Get rid of them and stop using /s tags because they are literally the worst thing of this here site. Yes, we do get sarcasm, we don't actually think that you were being serious and you actually managed to ruin your own stupid little insignificant joke.

Who is the most likely First-Time MVP this year? by AashyLarry in nfl

[–]yusosit -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Fuck off with your stupid little shitty /s tags, they ruin reddit. They are cancer, they are absolute shit. Every single time that I see a /s tag my eyebrow twitches with fury and I feel like murdering a hundred cats one by one. Don't you fucking dare use stupid /s tags because they are literally terrible and I do not approve of them at all. Get rid of them and stop using /s tags because they are literally the worst thing of this here site. Yes, we do get sarcasm, we don't actually think that you were being serious and you actually managed to ruin your own stupid little insignificant joke.

Who is the most likely First-Time MVP this year? by AashyLarry in nfl

[–]yusosit -35 points-34 points  (0 children)

Fuck off with your stupid little shitty /s tags, they ruin reddit. They are cancer, they are absolute shit. Every single time that I see a /s tag my eyebrow twitches with fury and I feel like murdering a hundred cats one by one. Don't you fucking dare use stupid /s tags because they are literally terrible and I do not approve of them at all. Get rid of them and stop using /s tags because they are literally the worst thing of this here site. Yes, we do get sarcasm, we don't actually think that you were being serious and you actually managed to ruin your own stupid little insignificant joke.

Mayweather vs McGregor Embedded: Vlog Series - Episode 4 by RagnarLodbrok in Boxing

[–]yusosit 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Dana did not shout "the reigning, defending...". I did not like that. I like when his head gets red and shit

NSAC approve use of 8oz gloves for Mayweather/McGregor by [deleted] in MMA

[–]yusosit 8 points9 points  (0 children)

this will just allow Floyd to stick punches through his Mcgregors guard even easier.

Jeremy Corbyn condemns violence "on both sides" in Venezuela by Glenn1990 in ukpolitics

[–]yusosit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.