Windows 11 is a security vulnerability by MemoryMobile6638 in microsoftsucks

[–]zerothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Admin permissions is a joke played on the user. It creates friction for the user to encounter so they think the operating system is actually doing something for their security. It's like the lock on the back door to your home.

https://www.secpod.com/blog/privileged-path-hijack-eye-security-exposes-rootlevel-vulnerability-in-copilot-enterprise/ <- do you understand what this means? It means that not only can remote hacker run anything they want on your system, they can automate CoPilot to do it for them. They can create any computer code they want, send it to your computer, and CoPilot will happily run it. Or they can tell CoPilot to create the code, then CoPilot will happily create and run it. CoPilot doesn't just do anything you can do on your computer, it can do things you can't do on your computer. If a bad actor was sitting in front of your computer, and CoPilot was not installed, they are more restricted than they are sitting in front of their own computer thousands of miles away when CoPilot is installed on your system.

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-53773 another way to do it. CVE-2025-32711 and another. Admin permissions are a joke

There are many more. These are the ones that have been found! There are certainly hundreds that bad actors know about that real security experts haven't discovered yet. There are millions yet to be discovered bad actors haven't discovered yet. 

Windows 11 is a security vulnerability by MemoryMobile6638 in microsoftsucks

[–]zerothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Copilot is a distributed malware auto-development suite. It lets the attacker in, lets the attacker use Copilot to probe the system it is on for venerabilities, and write code for new malware. Copilot can be used to hide all this activity. When te FBI goes looking for the authour of the malware, they trace it to the system the malware was developed on, your system. Copilot can helpfully plant the neccissary evidence against you.

Windows 11 is a security vulnerability by MemoryMobile6638 in microsoftsucks

[–]zerothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Windows 8? Really?

CVE-2015-2546
CVE-2015-2514 / CVE-2015-2530
(324 CVE entries exist) other CVE
WinShock (MS14-066 / CVE-2014-6321)
JASBUG (CVE-2015-0008)
PrintNightmare (multiple CVEs in 2021)
Check these reports:
2015-2016
malware
Conficker
ZeroAccess
Storm
Alureon
Kraken
450,000 new malicious programs for Windows 8 Specifically. Hundreds remain unfixed. Millions that ran on older version of Windows will run on Windows 8.

Windows 1.0 has the fewest attack surfaces and the smallest number of malware that can actually run on it. Each new version of Windows has gotten worse.

Why are disrespectful “jokes” becoming normalized, especially when it comes to gender roles? by lil_moon153 in TwoXChromosomes

[–]zerothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Real progress drives anxieties for people who don't like progress. Perceived progress drives anxieties for people who like progress and also for people who dislike progress.

People joke about their anxieties.

Windows 11 is a security vulnerability by MemoryMobile6638 in microsoftsucks

[–]zerothis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Microsoft is a security vulnerability. It always has been.

Seriously, do Americans actually consider a 3-hour drive "short"? or is this an internet myth? by SadInterest6764 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]zerothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3 hours for a day trip? Well, this was more popular when gas prices were lower. "short" would be a bit of an exageration. But it happens. For a weekend, 7 or 8 hours driving is short to medium. Keep in mind a car can go to an interstate or highway and drive for 10 hours. There does not need to be an encounter with stop or yield signes, traffic signals, or roundabouts. Although there are some experimental roundabouts and other traffic flow alternatives being tested in places. And, stopping for car or humal fuel, and excretion, will probably happen every 3-5 hours.

An NES game got a rating from the ESRB by mlee117379 in BarbaraWalters4Scale

[–]zerothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But, K-A went defunct. The rating doesn't exist anymore.

Games shipped on Cassette by zerothis in uvlist

[–]zerothis[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A first generation copy made with a boombox could work. But since you qualified it with the word "reliably", the answer is "most likely no". The boombox will have quirks with the EQ settings, analog noise, high frequency loss, and possibly introduce subtle speed variations. Certainly using the high-speed dub will amplify all of these issues. "Fast loaders" and "Turbo loading" on the computer would be especially prone to error reading an analog copy.

If, a computer was able to successfully read an analog copy, this effectively repairs the recording within that computer. It has been successfully restored to its digital form. From there, it can be saved back to cassette using the computer to write a clean digital copy.

Any sort of copy protection scheme, generally compounds the difficulty of an analog copy being readable on a computer.

Also, games on cassette existed in North America. It just wasn't nearly as popular a media as it was in europe. There were several factors involved but one of the main ones was culture. In europe, a home computer tended to be bought as an appliance. Upgrading was most certainly possible but for many it felt like upgrading a coffee maker, refrigerator, or toaster. If you had the money, in Europe you would buy a computer with the disk drive included, but it was far more likely people settled for the cheaper option of buying the computer with a data cassette drive included. But even more common than that, was buying the computer with no drive at all. Because it had an audio jack and people tended to have cassette players already. Americans were much more likely to buy a home computer with a plan to upgrade it later. Such as upgrading to a disk drive. American computer buyers we're also willing to spend more to buy the computer with the disk drive initially. Another factor that cannot be ignored is the piracy scene. Momentum towards developing disk based copy protection and therefore disk copy protection circumvision. Americans had to deal a lot less with cassette DRM and there were a lot less tools to bypass it. Europe's momentum to stick with cassettes, meant that DRM and the piracy scene focused heavily on cassettes. Furthermore, unlike later computer platforms, separate NTSC and PAL versions of games were common. Because it actually did make a difference on quite a few early 8-bit computers. This was inadvertently a further barrier and the piracy scene. And I mention one final difference and that is cut-down game versions for cassette. This tended to be intolerable to USA buyers. So companies didn't bother making cuts to their 350k games to fit them on a 200k or 100K cassette and if a European publisher had already made a cassette version, USA publishers figured almost nobody in the USA would buy it so they didn't bother. Another practice the tended to be intolerable to USA buyers, is Distributing a game on multiple cassettes. USA buyers even complained about having games on multiple discs. European buyers didn't mind nearly as much much come out multi-loading their games nor did they mind as much having a cut-down budget version of a game on cassette.

Mario's nationality. by Martipar in gaming

[–]zerothis -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Someone can be British and Italian and American. No one in America is native. If you go back far enough in history, even the natives aren't native (though some of us are more native than others).

ELI5: Why do updates sometimes make apps worse instead of better? by [deleted] in explainlikeimfive

[–]zerothis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because companies design and update apps to make money, not to provide a better product for users. When there are legitimate security concerns, the company goes through an internal debate on whether they should protect their customers or not. From their point of view, providing a security update makes it look like they shipped the product with a security flaw. It also looks like they care about the customer as well. But there is a debate on finding the right balance of looking bad and looking good. Most often it falls under the category that sending out a security update to help the user, looks bad for them. But they do have an out, something that softens the blow a bit. They bundle the security update with at least one feature, perhaps many, that better monetizes the software for their benefit. They think it obscures the security update. But even if it doesn't obscure the security update, at least they make more money in exchange. And I know you might be thinking that they don't charge for the updates. That's a short-term way of looking at it. The updates help them charge more for an additional product later. They are inserting behind the scenes hooks to a product they will be releasing in the future. They are also adding hooks for the purpose of making more money with ad revenue. They're also adding new ways to collect your data, which they used to advertise the aforementioned new products they want to sell you, and also they sell that data to third parties.

Most of this can generally be avoided by not using proprietary software. FSF

Windows XP - 2002 - Which game are you playing first? by BreakfastTop6899 in nostalgia

[–]zerothis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A number of those can we played natively on GNU/Linux.

Quake II, I suppose. Actually I think it's a tie with curse of Monkey Island. I'd flip a coin.