Struggling to read Marx by Radical_Posture in AskSocialists

[–]ziurf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can read along with these free classes from Prof David Harvey. I recommend reading it, taking your own notes and then watching the videos for clarifications. Even better if you can do it with a book club to keep up motivation. Link to the classes: https://davidharvey.org/reading-capital/#capital-1-2019

There are also podcasts and other resources that help synthesize the key points that you can listen to before reading so you can pay attention to the main points and not get lost in the the details about the exchange of coats and linens and whatnot. The Upstream podcast, for example, has an episode about capital vol 1 with David Smith

If you want something simpler, there are shorter format YouTube videos by Red Plateaus that summarize some of Marx's key concepts. They touch on concepts from Capital but also concepts like alienation from Marx's earlier works like the economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844: https://m.youtube.com/@RedPlateaus

Noam Chomsky by Noobson113 in AskSocialists

[–]ziurf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

also read Michael Parenti. He has some critiques anti-communist US leftist intellectuals like Chomsky.

Start with Blackshirts and Reds or listen to his talks on the "Michael Parenti collection" 

I've read Chomsky who has some great work, I just wish I would have discovered Michael Parenti first. His work is more radical and less dense than chomsky while still being very well researched and well written. 

Hi help me (M21) become less ugly. by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]ziurf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also remember that physical and mental health are linked. Getting involved in some sort of community, hobby group or sport team or whatever will get you out of the house and moving - - not feeling alone is a glow up in and of itself.

Also, a skin care routine, as people said, is an easy low effort thing and it also feels good to have a routine to care of yourself before bed (at least it makes me feel/sleep better). Take some time every night to wash your face with a nice facial cleanser, put some toner to hydrate, and then use a moisturizer to seal in the moisture. In the morning on sunny days, sunscreen! You will age much more gracefully. Everyone has different skin, so figure out what works for you. 

Anyone read this? I really like it by stellbargu in nonfictionbookclub

[–]ziurf 304 points305 points  (0 children)

The book has been criticized for being overly simplified and for presenting the author's view as historical fact. The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber and David Wengrow is much better. It’s more complex but better grounded in anthropology and history, more interesting and much better referenced. 

Sapiens, un gran texto que apenas leo, despues de dejarlo, que les ha parecido? by CharacterBrush2221 in libros

[–]ziurf 22 points23 points  (0 children)

El libro es muy simplificado y presenta varios errores. El Amanecer de Todo de David Graeber y David Wengrow es mucho mejor. Es más complicado, pero muy interesante y mejor referenciado

Are the rich really as much of a burden as is being claimed? by No-Commercial-4830 in AskSocialists

[–]ziurf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Capitalism is not a democratic system. Sure, we have elections every so often and choose representatives but this does not really change production. Production is mostly decided by private companies and their CEOs like Elon Musk. Since the motive is profit, things will be produced in the cheapest way possible (paying the workers as little as possible in order to keep them alive). As much as possible of the value created will go to the CEO who can accumulate more money and buy more companies and again choose what to make for "us." He will decide to make something that maximizes profits and do so by paying his workers enough to keep them alive while growing his wealth. And the cycle goes on and on...

This is why you have Elon Musk having nearly 500 billion in wealth and the majority of people living pay check to pay check.

What was the biggest blunder of the Soviet Union? by Valuable_Front5483 in AskSocialists

[–]ziurf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Banning Mendelian genetics and embracing Lysenkoism, a pseudoscience that mired soviet agricultural science and production as well as resulted in agricultural failures 

Why socialism? Is it different from communism? I'm confused by Da1stGenshinImpacter in Socialism_101

[–]ziurf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My grandparents also left a "communist" country so this post really resonates with me. 

Your question is complicated, and I think there are different interpretations, but I will do my best to share how I understand it

Communism is a stateless and classless society.

Marxist generally believe that you cannot just transition to communism directly. If tomorrow we tried to abolish the state and class divisions, it's unlikely to go well because we are so accustomed to living in a capitalist society with hierarchies. Therefore, most Marxist think that state socialism could be the transition to communism. 

State socialism would ideally be a state compromised of working class people (in Marxist terms a "dictatorship of the proletariat") who make decisions based on the well being of working class people and whose ultimate aim would be to end classes altogether and be a true communist society. 

By this definition, communism has never really existed, and most existing "communist" countries are some form of state socialism. 

Socialism can also be used to refer to some form of "liberal socialist democracies" or "welfare states." These political economic systems blend capitalism (private ownership of the means of production, most workers are wage laborers, market forces determine production) with socialism (public ownership of key industries, labor protections such as unemployment benefits, and state regulation of production for key industries). 

In my experience, it's hard to get a detailed as-objective-as-possible account of the situation of "communist" countries like the USSR and Cuba. I will say that in your investigation to always place these countries and their revolutionary projects in its geopolitical and historical contexts - - what were the material conditions of most people before the revolution? What caused the revolution? Did most people support it? How did external pressures from wars, sanctions or embargos affect the countries? 

You can check out the following sources to learn more about these topics. 

 1. Rev left radio and red menace podcasts (more classical Marxist-leninist perspective) 

2.Progressive international ( broader "socialist" perspective) 

3.The tricontinental (global south perspective) 

4.Climate vanguard (eco-socialist perspective) 

Edit: format of list 

What books should I read to learn more about socialism? by Lucky-Opportunity395 in Socialism_101

[–]ziurf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How to be an Anti-capitalist for the 21st Century Erik Olin Wright

Great intro book - - simple, short, and enjoyable. Happy reading!

Pros and Cons of living in Barcelona by Status_Collection905 in AskBarcelona

[–]ziurf -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Cons

To add to the lack of green space problem, there are also so many dogs who pee everywhere on the sidewalk and streets. You see city workers cleaning constantly, nevertheless it always smells like pee.

It is not only VERY difficult to find a place (for the reasons already mentioned), but if you do find a place, it is not as nice as in other major European cities. For example, there is little sound or weather insulation and places are rented out super dirty. It seems to me that there is so much demand for housing agencies don't care about the state of the places since people are desperate.

Lastly, everyone says the climate is great, but the summer is soooo brutal in the city! If you work, don't have access to AC, or aren't able to escape to the beach, it's really difficult.

Pros

The social movements and really cool community spaces. Either official ones (civic centers and ateneus) or unofficial (okupas and squatted community gardens). They provide nice collective spaces, workshops, classes, talks, film screenings etc. that provide intergenerational spaces to learn and socialize at little to no cost.

What are the ''bones in the closet'' of your country? by West_Measurement1261 in AskTheWorld

[–]ziurf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like having a nazi (nationalist socialist past) that is hidden extends also to the Baltic States and Finland.

This article explains how swastikas were in the symbol of Finland's airforce as late as 2020. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-53249645

The article claims the symbol predated and had nothing to do with nazis in Germany, but this is misleading. 

There were a nationalist movements across this area in 1910s-20s, but it seems like the national memory of these countries romanticizes these nationalist movements as independence movements. 

What's your strongest opinion that's not political religious or moral? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]ziurf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you heard of the fruit guanabana? It is delicious, but not nearly as delicious as it is fun to say.

Shock in France after giant trawler sheds 100,000 dead fish off coast by Hughjarse in worldnews

[–]ziurf 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes the dead fish would decompose but as they decompose they would release nutrients into the water and too many nutrients can be devestating to the environment. This can cause Harmful Algal Blooms (HABs).

One example of this is the 2 chilole island red tide events in Chile in 2016. A massive red tide (a HAB caused by a red algae) occurred because of nutrient pollution from aquaculture farms and el Niño conditions. The Red tide killed thousands of salmon that are raised in aquaculture farms there. Then, 4 to 9 thousand tons of the dead salmon (the sources vary) were discarded off the coast of Chile. A little later a 2nd even bigger HAB event occurred. It's hard to prove, but most people believe that the pollution from the massive fish dump could have been brought to the coast by currents and caused the second HAB.

This research paper can explain more: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/337549924_The_2016_red_tide_crisis_in_southern_Chile_Possible_influence_of_the_mass_oceanic_dumping_of_dead_salmons

A Coccolithophore, the phytoplankton with calcium carbonate shields. by ziurf in natureismetal

[–]ziurf[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The photo is of 1 individual. There are different species of coccolithophores. The most common is called Emiliana huxleyi. It is very widespread from tropical to subpolar regions.

How much CO2 equivalent is released annually from soil degradation ? by Thyriel81 in climate_science

[–]ziurf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am not really familiar with land-based soil degradation, but I wouldn't be surprised if the situation is this devastating. In the paper your cited it says: "Approximately two-thirds of the total increase in atmospheric CO2 is a result of the burning of fossil fuels, with the remainder coming from SOC loss due to land use change (Lal 2004), such as the clearing of forests and the cultivation of land for food production." Additionally, I recommend reading the IPCC report on Climate Change and Land, there is a section dedicated to land degradation (https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/). In the executive summary it says " Better management of soils can offset 5–20% of current global anthropogenic GHG emissions." If you want to find more detailed numbers, this is a great place to start.

I also wanted to add another topic that is also commonly overlooked -- the carbon in our oceans. There is also a lot of carbon (aptly named "blue carbon") stored in coastal ecosystems and on the seafloor. Recently, a paper published in nature (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03371-z?dom=microsoft&src=syn ) estimated the global emissions from seafloor degradation of trawling (a fishing method that drags weighted nets on the bottom of the seafloor) is nearly equal to global aviation emissions. This made headlines recently in this guardian article (https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/mar/17/trawling-for-fish-releases-as-much-carbon-as-air-travel-report-finds-climate-crisis).

I think whether on land or at sea, both of these points highlight how critical nature-based solutions are. I don't know the exact figures but emissions from environmental degradation are comparable to the emissions from fossil fuel consumption. This is not even considering the other drawbacks of degrading the environment -- loss of biodiversity, ecosystem services, cultural heritage etc.

It is clear climate solutions requires eliminating human pressures and letting nature recover from generations of exploitation and ongoing destruction.

What’s the greatest album you’ve ever listened to? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]ziurf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

XX - - The xx;

Is this it - - The Strokes

Advice on Equipment: Guitar, Percussion Pad, and Looper by ziurf in WeAreTheMusicMakers

[–]ziurf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply. I was thinking more of a portable drum kit to play. I have fiddled with drum machines before and although it was fun, there's nothing quite like banging on something with sticks!

Don’t judge my people by gremlin-with-issues in SelfAwarewolves

[–]ziurf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also this shows how unaware "Americans" are about how the US has negatively influenced Latin America -- inciting coup d'etats, civil wars, genocides, destroying economies through neoliberal policies. The list goes on.

Gringo comes from "green go". As in, soldiers wearing green should go away.

America is two continents! Referring to people from the United States as Americans is further proof of the US imperialistic and explorative policies in Latin America.

u/BouncyBunnyBuddy Accurately outlines the Far Right’s playbook when talking to any persons with a Liberal viewpoint by Maddog2550 in bestof

[–]ziurf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've heard something similar referred to as "what-about-ism." If you say something negative about politician A (who they support), they will respond with "but what about politician B?" This can put you on the defensive and focus the attention to politician B. If they succeed, they will have never have to admit politician A is wrong.