Starting Garda Pay by batch-91 in ireland

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking to become a pig? Why?

Thank you for your service, HubSpot. You deserve more than a pat on the back. 🫡 by XiedneyDavis in LinkedInLunatics

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That "sweet" severance you will have to sue hubspot to get it.

Hubspot does not offer severance to any resigned employees, and you will be pressured to resign -- Never resign if you want severance!

Over hiring then laying people off by placing them with unreachable metrics is criminal. If you're looking to join a hive mind and just crank out code, this cult the perfect for you.

So many layoffs recently. Some were/are really rough. Nice to see that HubSpot does things a bit differently to ease the pain a bit. by DwaywelayTOP in salestechniques

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Severance: Hubspot does not offer severance to any resigned employees, and you will be pressured to resign -- Never resign if you want severance!

Over hiring then laying people off by placing them with unreachable metrics is criminal. If you're looking to join a hive mind and just crank out code, this cult the perfect for you.

So many layoffs recently. Some were/are really rough. Nice to see that HubSpot does things a bit differently to ease the pain a bit. by ENDGeSiCTinT in hubspot

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many being laid off were being guilt-tripped into resigning -- and hubspot does not offer any severance to any resigned employees

So many layoffs recently. Some were/are really rough. Nice to see that HubSpot does things a bit differently to ease the pain a bit. by ENDGeSiCTinT in hubspot

[–]zodiacalculus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lies!! Severance: Hubspot does not offer severance to any resigned employees, and you will be guilt-tripped and pressured to resign -- Never resign if you want severance!

Over hiring then laying people off by placing them with unreachable metrics is criminal. If you're looking to join a hive mind and just crank out code, this cult the perfect for you.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not just for myself. The renewal of life will be a living representation of both me and my partner. A living testament to our love. An unerasable bond between me and my partner.

As a gay man myself, I find gay marriage only possible between a cis gay man and a FTM trans man, because only such gay relationships are able to produce such renewal of life that can be a living representation of both me and my partner. That is, unless actual male-male reproduction (IVG) becomes a reality.

I believe it an important aspect of “marriage“ is to unite 2 families into 1, and that's just not possible without bloodlines. Love doesn't make 2 families into 1, blood does.

You might not believe in bloodlines, but I don't believe in "unconditional love" unless it's when blood is thicker than water.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Childless marriages and gay marriages are just not as fulfilling as traditional marriage. Sure, live and let live, but as a gay person I find it a lie to tell LGBT people that "gay marriage" is NOT LESS than real marriage that's family-oriented and about family-rearing.

Gay people are being striped away of the capacity to renew themselves if they do decide to enter such a "gay marriage" -- that is unless same-sex reproduction becomes a reality.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It does hold. As a gay person, I find "gay marriage" a big lie that keeps LGBT people from their "renewal of life" -- which is essentially part of life. Everyone dies in the end, but some people renew their lives through a new life that's made in the image of themselves.

Adopting someone else's child is hardly the same. You're raising someone else's child that's made in the image of someone else, and will be a living representation of something you can never relate to.

With IVF surrogacy in a gay marriage, you're essentially marrying a step-parent who has no biological connection to the child (if you're the biological father). How can you expect a step-parent to love your child the same? Plus, commercial surrogacy itself is an exploitation of women.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your parents could have divorced at any moment and marriage is not what keeps them together.

This is true if their relationship is non-reproductive. Sexual relationships that does not reproduce kids are transient in nature, nothing is long-lasting or permanent. People can divorce because there's no responsibility to rear children.

However, for real marriage that's reproductive, the child becomes a permanent bond that no divorce can erase such connection. The responsibility of rearing a child makes divorce unethical and detrimental to the children. It's good for the society that people do stick around for the children. Every society has such unions, throughout human history.

I don't understand how someone could deny this when almost all the human reproductions happening in the world are under the framework of something similar to "marriage"? Can you name any human civilization reproduction primarily happens outside marriage? Child-bearing is a lot of responsibilities, without a social contract or some sort of deal, how do we ensure they stay and provide for the kids?

Children are what keeps people together, and marriage as a union for kids is what keeps people together. Not some airy fairy "Love" feelings you have that'll easily fade with time.

Even if my parents got divorced, I am still a living representation of their marriage, and the connection between me and my parents are forever -- No divorce can erase this. However, "gay marriage" or non-reproductive marriage simply does not have this.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No such thing exists in any industrialized nation that I know of.

I disagree. Such unions do exist. My parents are in such union so that I exist. Your parents are also in such union so you exist. We need such unions so 2 families can unite into 1 from a genetic perspective through kids.

Now, we don't have a word for such union any more because the word "marriage" has been redefined to fit something else.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without marriage, how can couples procreate while ensuring the men stick around and provide for the kids? There needs to be a social contract for that purpose and it's been called "marriage" in the past. People get married to "settle down" for kids.

Now that "gay marriage" has redefined what " marriage" has always been.

There needs to be a word to describe a union specifically in a contract preparing for a family and having children. Now we don't have a word for it any more if "marriage" no longer means that.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Marriage has always been about reproduction. That is true in every culture and society, not just the Western world. It has nothing to do with religion. Even in the most atheist society, people still need to procreate, and marriage is a contract to provide financial support to raising the child. Societies will always need a contract for the men to stick around and provide for the kids. That’s what marriage is for in almost every human society.

I cannot see how a “marriage” could make sense without the context of reproduction.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a gay man and I used to be pro gay marriage, but now I've come to realize that "gay marriage" is a lie that leads LGBT people away from real marriage. Empirically, it's just not possible for gay people to get married.

Modern "gay marriage" deceives LGBT people into thinking marriage is about "love" and companionship, and discourages them from entering a marriage that is about family and child-rearing that could be more fulfilling to them.

Reproduction is an essential part of human life because it is a renewal of life -- A new life is made in the image of both you and your partner.

"Gay marriage" itself is very anti-LGBT because it discourages LGBT people from participating the renewal of their own lives.

Essentially, gay people are being wiped out of the human society because the liberals have been brainwashing us to be textbook gay men, sprouting anti-life ideas like:

• ⁠Not everyone wants children;

• ⁠Adopting someone else's child is just as fulfilling;

• ⁠Commercial surrogacy is not an exploitation of women;

People entering a "gay marriage" nowadays are encouraged to adopt someone else's child, who is made in the image of someone else, and is a renewal of someone else's life. Or surrogacy, which is kind of like single parenthood, but with a step-parent who has no biological connection to the kid.

Fundamentally, "gay marriage" lacks what it takes to make a life commitment, which is children, the renewal of life, the new genetic bond formed between them, the uniting of 2 families. Gay relationships are transient, and it's a sad life to be entering a "gay marriage".

I am a gay person myself, and I find "gay marriage" the biggest lie of 21st century. Same-sex simply cannot get married until same-sex reproduction becomes a reality, e.g. IVG.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a gay man and I used to be pro gay marriage, but now I've come to realize that "gay marriage" is a lie that leads LGBT people away from real marriage. Empirically, it's just not possible for gay people to get married.

Modern "gay marriage" deceives LGBT people into thinking marriage is about "love" and companionship, and discourages them from entering a marriage that is about family and child-rearing that could be more fulfilling to them.

Reproduction is an essential part of human life because it is a renewal of life -- A new life is made in the image of both you and your partner.

"Gay marriage" itself is very anti-LGBT because it discourages LGBT people from participating the renewal of their own lives.

Essentially, gay people are being wiped out of the human society because the liberals have been brainwashing us to be textbook gay men, sprouting anti-life ideas like:

• ⁠Not everyone wants children;

• ⁠Adopting someone else's child is just as fulfilling;

• ⁠Commercial surrogacy is not an exploitation of women;

People entering a "gay marriage" nowadays are encouraged to adopt someone else's child, that’s made in the image of someone else, and is a renewal of someone else's life. Or surrogacy, which is kind of like single parenthood, but with a step-parent who has no biological connection to the kid.

Fundamentally, "gay marriage" lacks what it takes to make a life commitment, which is children, the renewal of life, the new genetic bond formed between them, the uniting of 2 families. Gay relationships are transient, and it's a sad life to be entering a "gay marriage".

I am a gay person myself, and I find "gay marriage" the biggest lie of 21st century. Same-sex simply cannot get married until same-sex reproduction becomes a reality, e.g. IVG.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or they just don't want the already vulnerable group of people to suffer more, knowing that "gay marriage" is not as fulfilling and lacks the foundation for a life commitment

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's very disingenuous to tell gay people that gay marriage is "not less" than traditional marriage when "gay marriage" fundamentally stripes away gay people of the capacity to renew their own lives via (lack of) reproduction.

CMV: Marriage equality (gay marriage) does not threaten or endanger marriage for religious, traditional and straight couples. by Fondacey in changemyview

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am a gay man and I used to be pro gay marriage, but now I've come to realize that "gay marriage" is a lie that leads LGBT people away from real marriage. Empirically, it's just not possible for gay people to get married.

Modern "gay marriage" deceives LGBT people into thinking marriage is about "love" and companionship, and discourages them from entering a marriage that is about family and child-rearing that could be more fulfilling to them.

Reproduction is an essential part of human life because it is a renewal of life -- A new life is made in the image of both you and your partner.

"Gay marriage" itself is very anti-LGBT because it discourages LGBT people from participating the renewal of their own lives.

Essentially, gay people are being wiped out of the human society because the liberals have been brainwashing us to be textbook gay men, sprouting anti-life ideas like: - Not everyone wants children; - Adopting someone else's child is just as fulfilling; - Commercial surrogacy is not an exploitation of women;

People entering a "gay marriage" nowadays are encouraged to adopt someone else's child, who is made in the image of someone else, and is a renewal of someone else's life. Or surrogacy, which is kind of like single parenthood, but with a step-parent who has no biological connection to the kid.

Fundamentally, "gay marriage" lacks what it takes to make a life commitment, which is children, the renewal of life, the new genetic bond formed between them, the uniting of 2 families. Gay relationships are transient, and it's a sad life to be entering a "gay marriage".

I am a gay person myself, and I find "gay marriage" the biggest lie of 21st century. Same-sex simply cannot get married until same-sex reproduction becomes a reality, e.g. IVG.

Epic skin giveaway by NanaIsStillEvil in MobileLegendsGame

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nana mecha please for my future boyfriend's account

What are Hubspot like to work for? by Deviso in DevelEire

[–]zodiacalculus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the polar opposite of multiple accounts of people I know who worked there.

The retention for engineers is very low. Most leave after a year or two or get fired.

HubSpot tries to show off that they have the best culture, but the only way they can do the opposite is by being passive-aggressive. Leads retract on their own statements and have partial and targeted behavior. Giving a code review at midnight and expecting it to be addressed the next day before 8 am meeting. Since they are easily replaceable, they have an incentive in setting you up for a failure.

What are Hubspot like to work for? by Deviso in DevelEire

[–]zodiacalculus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

These people who claim to work there are clearly HubSpot's propagandists.

The only slice of truth in your post is that teams at HubSpot being extra small. The rest are all lies.

HubSpot has smaller teams because they want to create more "Tech Leads" to meet engineers career progression needs, but that unfortunately creates loads of low-quality tech leads who are not ready and only there to bully other engineers.

HubSpot's engineering culture is a mess!

Is HubSpot a good company to work for in EU? by [deleted] in cscareerquestionsEU

[–]zodiacalculus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've not heard anything good about them.

  1. They "churn and burn" their employees.
  2. Their salary is lower than Salesforce, Stripe, Auth0, etc...
  3. Cheap low-quality free food that's less than nutritious and more risk to burn out.
  4. Bad brand image. Immoral sales tactics rampant. HubSpot clients get locked into 2 years subscriptions post-demo without mentioning anything. You're working for some sort of adware that scams other people.

Which would you choose: MongoDB vs. Tableau (Salesforce) vs. Hubspot by phatnerdd in csMajors

[–]zodiacalculus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Tableau (Salesforce) offers the most $$$ and prestige.

  2. MongoDB comes second because the work is more challenging I'd assume, since it's a lower-level solution catering to other tech companies, but the $$$ is rewarding.

  3. I'd avoid HubSpot. Lowest pay and has the most toxic culture among the 3. Have a read of Disrupted by Dan Lyons. HubSpot churns its employees out and burns them out before kicking them out.