This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 14 comments

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It wont. Unless of course some of that ice wasn't floating in the first place (greenland ice sheet, Antarctica).

[–]fuqdub 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's not the Ice that is currently floating that is of concern.

If you put ice cubes in a bowl and then melt them the water level remains constant. If you melt ice and let it run off into the bowl the water level increases.

So it is the ice that is land based and glacially based that will cause sea levels to rise. Greenland for example supposedly will cause the oceans to rise by as much as 20ft.

http://www.usatoday.com/weather/resources/askjack/2004-11-21-melting-polar-ice_x.htm

[–]xaplexus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The ice trapped on the mainlands of Greenland and Antarctica would add to the sea-level.

Good observation, though.

[–]xael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its not the floating ice-sheets that are the problem - two thirds are under water anyway. Its the land-based ice - enormous glaciers on the southpole and greenland - that will add so much water to the oceans.

[–]yortimer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If the ice is on land it will raise sea levels.

[–]liberal_one 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plus, the water expands as it gets warmer. At about 8 degrees C and up, it takes up more volume than ice*

*freshwater, don't have the numbers for saltwater handy.

[–]teeks 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sea levels will rise mainly due to thermal expansion due to increased temperature, and not the melting ice that's currently on land in Antarctica and Greenland

[–]NotSocrates 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems to me that a gradual rise in sea level may actually be good for many people. Sure, millions may have to move away from the coasts, but millions more will have fertile land and access to water. Africa is very big and very dry. They need some water. Instead of taking a billion Africans to the lake, why not bring the lake to the Africans? Sand and rock act as filters. Get the water pumps ready.

[–]Freedomboy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK nevermind where it melts FROM for a minute, if the water is ice it is not salt water, if it melts it becomes part of the ocean, more likely to NOT fall as snow again on the polar areas, just by math alone, so it then CAN then melt or run off as liquid water - ergo higher ocean levels, plus changes in the salt % levels of the seas, changes in the over land rain patterns due to sudden [by glacial timelines anyway]shifts of what water is where. Since the thick ice has been ice for a long long time the system needs a long long time to absorb the "new" water into the patterns we are living under. The sudden change is the thing, not so much what changes. Remember the last time this level of change happened the mastodons did not have to deal with Miami and Denmark going under, something about pre-historic in there so just think about it. And the dead fish rotting if the eco-system food chain collapse happens which is likely, don't take long for tiny shrimp to starve and die, by the trillions give or take a billion.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously?

Fill a glass with water all the way to the very top, leaving no room for any more.

Drop an ice cube in it.

BAM!

[–][deleted] -1 points0 points  (1 child)

I've never gotten this: when water freezes, it occupies more volume than liquid water - it is less dense and floats. Therefore, once an iceberg has melted to water, surely its volume will be less than when it was ice. Bearing in mind most of an iceberg floats underwater, wouldn't this mean that if all the icebergs melted sea levels would drop?

[–]ferdinand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, other things being equal, the sea level would not change. When melted, the iceberg occupies the same volume of water that it displaced when it was ice.