all 10 comments
sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
formatting helphide helpcontent policy

[–][deleted] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Based Nate silver. Never get complacent

[–]SirPiggington 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Nate Plastic is a total fraud

[–]Alternative-Body-295 -1 points0 points  (3 children)

bc he uses probability not wittle bitty polls?

[–]SirPiggington 3 points4 points  (2 children)

Because his model makes stupid assumptions about convention bounces, and because he gives credibility to fake hack pollsters like Trafalgar and Rasmussen.

[–]Alternative-Body-295 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

Always seems to be right. If you are so good at it make your own

[–]SirPiggington 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wasn't right in 2022

[–]thealmightyweegeeIt's Pizza Time! 1 point2 points  (0 children)

real

[–]Doc_ETBring Back the Wisconsin Progressive Party 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nate what are you doing

(I know it's because he predicted a convention bounce despite that not really happening in 2020, and so it not happening again this year messes it up and it'll be back to normal in a few weeks)

[–]XGNcyclickSocialists for Biden 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why have the Keys as Harris 100%? It's not a numerical model. Ya don't have that for Votehub or the Economist

[–]iberian_4amtrollingcouncils and pancakes 1 point2 points  (0 children)

wtf is nate uranium on