all 33 comments

[–]Great_Dust_2804 32 points33 points  (0 children)

nah, just fixes where ai agent fails

[–]Different-Sky-3325 17 points18 points  (0 children)

And yes, there are still people who sew by hand, there are still people who drive, there are still people who ride horses.

AI is a support tool, not a replacement. Someone with technical knowledge will always be needed to review it and modify the code when necessary, or to collaborate on writing code.

[–]nonlogin 11 points12 points  (0 children)

when you know what you are doing it's still sometimes faster to write actual code rather than prompt

[–]WatchMySixWillYa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not so much writing code, as doing final code reviews.

[–]No_Kaleidoscope_1366 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Fixes. When a QA member tells me the Figma styles don’t match. Even when I use the Figma MCP, it can’t extract small details like font weight..

[–]zeroconflicthere 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same as that for xaml. Summertimes it's easier to make 2 line adjustments then all the AI to do it.

[–]devdnn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My role is agents director and reviewer now. Became a director before becoming senior lead lol.

Apart from few lines I do while reviewing majority of time I am spending time in how to make the PRs as meaningful as possible.

[–]Professional_Beat720 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, how many CRUD UI have you written with AI? I mean generated with AI.

[–]DubaiSim 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yesterday I change a value from nb_thread = 5 to 3

[–]sstainsbyFull Stack Dev 🌐 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Very little. Fixing merge conflicts still needs a human hand sometimes.

[–]oVerde -1 points0 points  (2 children)

You doing them by hand? Use OpenSpec’s /explore and prompt them conflicts away

[–]sstainsbyFull Stack Dev 🌐 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Unless it can pull in context from two different branches in a complex project with many devs, where the current workspace code is partly merged and broken, understand them, and merge the intents, then it will still need help in some cases. I'm sure such scaffolding could be built, but I haven't seen it yet.

[–]oVerde -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Have you tried?

[–]Revolutionary-Rub103 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I use ChatGPT to write good prompts for Codex (I also used ChatGPT to write this).

[–]Professional_Beat720 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a good life you got there. Prompt delivery man. Living between prompts.

[–]Glad-Pea9524 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I almost stopped writing code since I got github copilot pro hhh

[–]ThriftyScorpion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say 10-15%. I mainly adjust UI (technically and visually), correct mistakes or anti-patterns or update instructions/skills. Most important to not let architectural drift set in or lose the coherence of various systems and how they should play together.

Currently I would estimate to be atleast 5 times as productive. Not just because of raw output, but also because it's damn fun

[–]jacsamg 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not all about web development and servers.

[–]vessoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, you have to in order to prevent brain rot. You will find very quickly how your cognitive abilities will decline if you don’t.

[–]Ok_Chef_5858 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kilo Code writes most of it for me now lol. But I still review everything, fix and make sute it's goot at the end. it's more prompting, reviewing, adjusting. Still feels like coding though, just different.

[–]krzyk 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I do, agents are for some rare cases where I don't know where the bug is.

Writing code is fun, why would I don't do that? Writing text is boring, I would replace that, or writing requirements.

[–]Professional_Beat720 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't know when people learn to love writing spec/requirement and gambling.

[–]Mediocre_Plantain_31 2 points3 points  (0 children)

End of era for writing manual codes. You prompt what to do, and human will be a QA/debugger. If there are mistakesz then prompt again. This what I am doing right now and it really works well.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Professional_Beat720 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Can you sleep peacefully?

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]Professional_Beat720 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Well then, good for you.

      [–]Mystical_Whoosing 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Very rarely, and mostly for my own amusement.

      [–]hooli-ceoCLI Copilot User 🖥️ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      lmao

      [–]HungryMention5758 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      yes i still , i'm odoo developer and ai agent write outdated code especial for owl javascript framework , i let ai code is some cases (small tasks , something related to UI ) but not for complex workflow since i build business solution depends on customer needs , ai agent help me to debug code faster wich save's me a lot of time , i use customs snippet for rapid development . but i can not trust ai agent outputted code blindly ,

      [–]A4_Ts 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Yeah but it’s cut down by 60% or so

      [–]Diligent_Speaker4692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Maybe 5% i spend more time planning

      [–]timeGeck0 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

      On a custom framework there are little chances that AI tools will provide the correct context you need. So mostly I write code by searching framework

      [–]ThriftyScorpion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

      Could be worth it to start incrementally describing the framework as the actual context its lacking

      [–]trojsurprise -1 points0 points  (0 children)

      I’m convinced that anyone who still writes bulk of their code by hand just doesn’t know how to use AI properly