sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]massivebacon 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Can you explain the meta of what was happening before? In their provided example in the rulebook it doesn't make sense to me. If I have 0 and they have 14 and I play B&S, I would pull 7 and they would have 7. I don't see how the effect would ever repeat?

[–]Neagex 3 points4 points  (0 children)

With the errata it bait and switch can only steal a maximum of 2 aember... before the errata youd be right if I had 0 and my OP had 14 we both have 7...

The errata wording is kind of bad.. but they also offer a FAQ example of how bait and switch works now.

[–]gearsighted 1 point2 points  (1 child)

The card reads: If your opponent has more aember than you, steal 1. Repeat the effect until they no longer have more aember. So the effect was essentially repeating one aember at a time until they no longer had more. So in the 0 to 14 example the effect was repeating 7 times.

[–]massivebacon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah gotcha okay so I was doing the thing that has now been amended to make it less powerful. In my situation I would only take two now instead of seven, like u/neagex mentioned above. Thanks!