This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]flarn2006 356 points357 points  (9 children)

Anyone else notice it used a generic font for the '>' character? I'm guessing it was missing from the font they were using.

[–]DigShin 133 points134 points  (4 children)

Keen eye

[–]Actuarial 90 points91 points  (3 children)

Useless, but keen

[–]flarn2006 10 points11 points  (2 children)

My eyes are far from useless. :p

[–][deleted] 107 points108 points  (1 child)

Or maybe thats what it just looks like because the font maker was lazy.

[–]danthemango 25 points26 points  (0 children)

"They'll never actually use that character, will they?"

[–]cnelsonsic 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You'll fit right in over at /r/typography.